Subjective value determines initial dominance in binocular rivalry

Abstract Does subjective reward value influence early visual perception? During binocular rivalry, one eye receives an image that is incompatible with the image the other eye receives. People consciously experience perceiving one image; the other image is suppressed from conscious awareness. We tested if subjective value functions as an endogenous influence (i.e., one internal to the perceiver) on dominance during rivalry. Images associated with rewards achieved initial perceptual dominance more often than images associated with cost ( Study 1 , Methods , Participants and procedures , Stimuli and presentation , Experimental counterbalancing conditions , Results , Study 2 , Methods , Participants , Stimuli and presentation , Procedure , Results , Reports of letters v. numbers seen as initial percept , Reports of dot location , Study 3 ). Value facilitated perception of rewarding images but did not inhibit perception of costly images ( Study 3 ). Additionally, when rewards benefited a disliked person, no bias in perceptual dominance was observed. Subjective value biased dominance despite accuracy incentives and was not explained by frequency of exposure, implicit learning, response bias, or task-specific accessibility. We discuss implications for the influence of motivated influences on perception, a phenomenon we call wishful seeing.

[1]  Joseph E LeDoux Emotion Circuits in the Brain , 2000 .

[2]  Sheng He,et al.  Processing of Invisible Stimuli: Advantage of Upright Faces and Recognizable Words in Overcoming Interocular Suppression , 2007, Psychological science.

[3]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Affective Flexibility Evaluative Processing Goals Shape Amygdala Activity , 2022 .

[4]  D. Dunning On the Motives Underlying Social Cognition , 2007 .

[5]  Brian N. Pasley,et al.  Subcortical Discrimination of Unperceived Objects during Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Neuron.

[6]  Fang Fang,et al.  A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  G. Alpers,et al.  Here is looking at you: emotional faces predominate in binocular rivalry. , 2007, Emotion.

[9]  Georgios A. Keliris,et al.  A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain , 2005, Vision Research.

[10]  E. Hartley,et al.  Religious Affiliation and Open-Mindedness in Binocular Resolution , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  S. R. Lehky An Astable Multivibrator Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1988, Perception.

[12]  L. Kaufman,et al.  ON THE SPREAD OF SUPPRESSION AND BINOCULAR RIVALRY. , 1963, Vision research.

[13]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[14]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes , 1994 .

[15]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[16]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Noboru Sugie,et al.  Neural models of brightness perception and retinal rivalry in binocular vision , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Separable Neural Components in the Processing of Black and White , 2022 .

[19]  F. Fang,et al.  Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  W. Levelt The alternation process in binocular rivalry , 1966 .

[21]  I. Blanchette,et al.  The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning , 2010 .

[22]  Frank Tong,et al.  Competing Theories of Binocular Rivalry: A Possible Resolution , 2001 .

[23]  Emily Balcetis,et al.  See what you want to see: motivational influences on visual perception. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Emily Balcetis,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance and the Perception of Natural Environments , 2007, Psychological science.

[25]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  The Role of Temporally Coarse Form Processing during Binocular Rivalry , 2008, PloS one.

[26]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[27]  Emily Balcetis,et al.  Wishful Seeing , 2010, Psychological science.

[28]  W. Levelt On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[29]  J. Raymond,et al.  Selective Visual Attention and Motivation , 2009, Psychological science.

[30]  M. Erdelyi A new look at the new look: perceptual defense and vigilance. , 1974, Psychological review.

[31]  A. Tesser,et al.  Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping: You don't always help the one you like☆ , 1980 .

[32]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[33]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Onset Rivalry: Brief Presentation Isolates an Early Independent Phase of Perceptual Competition , 2007, PloS one.

[34]  G. Alpers,et al.  Emotional pictures predominate in binocular rivalry , 2006 .

[35]  David Dunning,et al.  Trait Importance and Modifiability as Factors Influencing Self-Assessment and Self-Enhancement Motives , 1995 .

[36]  C. Eriksen,et al.  An experimental and theoretical analysis of perceptual defense. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.