Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives

National and international survey data on global warming are summarized in terms of lev- els of awareness, actual knowledge, degree of concern, perceived risk, and willingness to pay or sacri- fice to mitigate or adapt to potential negative impacts. The data indicate the following: solid awareness of and support for general environmental goals; an awareness of and concern for global warming; a flawed understanding of global warming that is the result of an inappropriate application of a general pollution model; considerable perceived threat from global warming but less so than for most other issues; and a limited willingness to sacrifice to better cope with global warming. Although global warming generates concern around the globe, it is not a 'front-burner' issue. Concern tends to be high- est in Canada, most of Europe and South America. Errors in assessing causes of global warming are global in nature. International data demonstrates considerable support for economic sacrifices to deal with environmental problems, including global warming. Our own data support but go beyond earlier data by implying that global warming is not a salient issue, and that people across the globe will sup- port global climate change initiatives that do not levy unusual hardships; but they cannot be expected to voluntarily alter their lifestyles.

[1]  A. Henry.  Public perceptions of global warming , 2000 .

[2]  R. Dunlap,et al.  PUBLIC APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND OTHER NEW SOCIAL MOVEMENT GOALS IN WESTERN EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES , 1995 .

[3]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Environmental Values in American Culture , 1995 .

[4]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models , 1994 .

[5]  R. Warland,et al.  DO SURVEYS OVERSTATE PUBLIC CONCERNS , 1994 .

[6]  Willett Kempton,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN LEAD TO ACTION ON GLOBAL WARMING , 1993 .

[7]  T L McDaniels,et al.  Risk perception and the value of safety. , 1992, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  C. Levy-leboyer,et al.  Global Change: New Challenges for Psychology , 1991 .

[9]  W. Kempton.  Public understanding of global warming , 1991 .

[10]  G. Halford,et al.  Human Response to Environmental Changes , 1991 .

[11]  E. W. Colglazier.  Scientific Uncertainties, Public Policy, and Global Warming , 1991 .

[12]  L. Milbrath,et al.  Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society , 1985 .

[13]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Rating the Risks , 1979 .

[14]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[15]  R. J. Bord,et al.  Is Accurate Understanding of Global Warming Necessary to Promote Willingness to Sacrifice , 1997 .

[16]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. , 1995 .

[17]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Global Concern for the Environment: Is Affluence a Prerequisite? , 1995 .

[18]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Expert opinion on climate change , 1994 .

[19]  R. Dunlap.  International Attitudes Towards Environment and Development , 1994 .

[20]  R. Dunlap,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS AND PROTECTION , 1991 .

[21]  James D. Wright,et al.  The State of the Masses , 1986 .