A cost-benefit analysis of a deposit-refund program for beverage containers in Israel.

The paper presents a full cost-benefit analysis of a deposit-refund program for beverage containers in Israel. We examine all cost elements of the program--storage, collection, and treatment costs of empty containers, and all potential benefits--savings in alternative treatment costs (waste collection and landfill disposal), cleaner public spaces, reduction of landfill volumes, energy-savings externalities associated with use of recycled materials, and creation of new workplaces. A wide variety of data resources is employed, and some of the critical issues are examined via several approaches. The main finding of the paper is that the deposit-refund program is clearly economically worthwhile. The paper contributes to the growing body of literature on deposit-refund programs by its complete and detailed analysis of all relevant factors of such a program, and also specifically in its analysis of the savings in alternative waste management costs. This analysis reveals greater savings than are usually assumed, and thus shows the deposit-refund program to be highly efficient.

[1]  Peter Bohm,et al.  Deposit-Refund Systems: Theory and Applications to Environmental, Conservation, and Consumer Policy , 1981 .

[2]  Donald N. Dewees,et al.  Economic Analysis of Packaging Waste Reduction , 1998 .

[3]  Takayoshi Shinkuma,et al.  On the Second-best Policy of Household's Waste Recycling , 2003 .

[4]  Hilary A. Sigman,et al.  The Cost of Reducing Municipal Solid Waste , 1997 .

[5]  Dorte Vigsø.  Deposits on single use containers - a social cost-benefit analysis of the Danish deposit system for single use drink containers , 2004, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[6]  Frank Ackerman,et al.  Why Do We Recycle?: Markets, Values, and Public Policy , 1996 .

[7]  E. Williams,et al.  Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States , 2008 .

[8]  B. Platt,et al.  Recycling boosts the local economy , 1995 .

[9]  Hilary A. Sigman.  A comparison of public policies for lead recycling , 1995 .

[10]  Kelly H. Tiller,et al.  Generation of Recyclables by Rural Households , 1996 .

[11]  Arthur J. Caplan,et al.  Household Valuation of Curbside Recycling , 1999 .

[12]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Garbage, Recycling, and Illicit Burning or Dumping , 1993 .

[13]  Margaret Walls,et al.  Waste, recycling, and “Design for Environment”: Roles for markets and policy instruments , 2005 .

[14]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  Design for the Environment , 1996 .

[15]  D. Lavee.  Is Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Economically Efficient? , 2007, Environmental management.

[16]  Eric I. Pas,et al.  Assessing the True Cost of Landfills , 1992 .

[17]  T. Dinan,et al.  Economic Efficiency Effects of Alternative Policies for Reducing Waste Disposal , 1993 .

[18]  K. Palmer,et al.  Optimal policies for solid waste disposal Taxes, subsidies, and standards , 1997 .

[19]  Richard C. Porter,et al.  A social benefit-cost analysis of mandatory deposits on beverage containers , 1978 .