A comprehensive analysis of the response time of MR dampers

The primary purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review on the response time of magnetorheological (MR) dampers. Rapid response time is desired for all real-time control applications. In reviewing the literature, a detailed description of the response time of semi-active dampers is seldom given. Furthermore, the methods of computing the response time are not discussed in detail. The authors intend to develop a method for the definition and the experimental determination of the response time of MR dampers. Furthermore, parameters affecting the response time of MR dampers are investigated. Specifically, the effect of operating current, piston velocity, and system compliance are addressed. Because the response time is often limited, not by the response of the fluid itself, but by the limitations of the driving electronics and the inductance of the electromagnet, the response time of the driving electronics is considered as well. The authors define the response time as the time required to transition from the initial state to 95% of the final state. Using a triangle wave to maintain constant velocity across the damper, various operating currents ranging from 0.5 to 2 A were applied and the resulting force was recorded. The results show that, for a given velocity, the response time decreases as the operating current increases. Results for the driving electronics show the opposite trend: as current increases, response time increases. To evaluate the effect of piston velocity on response time, velocities ranging from 0.1 to 4 in s−1 were tested. The results show that the response time decreases exponentially as the velocity increases, converging on some final value. Further analysis revealed that this result is an artifact of the compliance in the system. To confirm this, a series of tests was conducted in which the compliance of the system was artificially altered. The results of the compliance study indicate that compliance has a significant effect on the response time of the damper.

[1]  Keum-Shik Hong,et al.  Semi-active control of the Macpherson suspension system: hardware-in-the-loop simulations , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000. IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37162).

[2]  Dieter Hennecke,et al.  EDC III-The New Variable Damper System for BMW's Top Models- A Further Development of our Adaptive, Frequency-Dependent Damper Control , 1990 .

[3]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  “Smart” Base Isolation Strategies Employing Magnetorheological Dampers , 2002 .

[4]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Seismic control of civil structures utilizing semiactive MR bracing systems , 2000, Smart Structures.

[5]  David J. Cole,et al.  Performance of a semi-active damper for heavy vehicles , 2000 .

[6]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Phenomenological Model of a Magnetorheological Damper , 1996 .

[7]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection , 1998 .

[8]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS , 1997 .

[9]  Mehdi Ahmadian,et al.  Experimental Approach for Finding the Response Time of MR Dampers for Vehicle Applications , 2003 .

[10]  Carla Seatzu,et al.  Semiactive Suspension Design with an Optimal Gain Switching Target , 1999 .

[11]  D. Gamota,et al.  Dynamic mechanical studies of electrorheological materials: Moderate frequencies , 1991 .

[12]  Jeong-Hoi Koo,et al.  Robustness Analysis of Semi-Active Tuned Vibration Absorbers With Magneto-Rheological Dampers: An Experimental Study , 2003 .

[13]  Michael J. Chrzan,et al.  High Strength Magneto- and Electro-rheological Fluids , 1993 .

[14]  Jeong-Hoi Koo,et al.  Experimental evaluation of magnetorheological dampers for semi-active tuned vibration absorbers , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[15]  Y. Wen.  Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .