Modeling of upwelling/relaxation events with the Navy Coastal Ocean Model

Prediction System (COAMPS TM )(COAMPS is a registered trademark of the Naval Research Laboratory). Issues investigated in this study are: NCOM-based model simulations of upwelling and relaxation events, coupling to COAMPS, use of sigma versus hybrid (sigma-z) vertical grids, and coupling with a larger-scale model on the open boundaries. The NCOM simulations were able to reproduce the observed sequence of the upwelling and relaxation events, which can be attributed, in part, to the good agreement between the observed and COAMPS winds. Comparisons with the mooring observations show that COAMPS overestimates shortwave radiation values, which makes the NCOM modeled SSTs too warm in comparison with observations. The NCOM runs forced with different resolution atmospheric forcing (3 versus 9 km) do not show significant differences in the predicted SSTs and mixed-layer depths at the mooring locations. At the same time, during the extended upwelling event, the model runs forced with 3 and 9 km resolution COAMPS fields show differences in the surface circulation patterns, which are the most distinct in the southern portion of the model domain. The model run with 9-km forcing develops a northward flow along the coast, which is not present in the run with 3-km forcing and in observations (for example, HF radar-derived radials). Comparison of the wind patterns of the 3- and 9-km products shows a weakening of the 9-km wind stress along the southern coast of the NCOM model domain, which is responsible for the development of the artificial northward flow in the NCOM run with 9-km forcing.

[1]  R. Hodur.  Development and Testing of the Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS) , 1993 .

[2]  John C. Kindle,et al.  A COAMPS™ reanalysis for the Eastern Pacific: Properties of the diurnal sea breeze along the central California coast , 2002 .

[3]  Igor Shulman,et al.  HF radar data assimilation in the Monterey Bay area , 2004 .

[4]  Peter A. Rochford,et al.  An optimal definition for ocean mixed layer depth , 2000 .

[5]  Dale B. Haidvogel,et al.  Coastal Ocean Modeling: Processes and Real-Time Systems ~~ , 2000 .

[6]  Melinda S. Peng,et al.  Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System (NOGAPS): Forcing for Ocean Models , 2002 .

[7]  S. Rutledge,et al.  The Mesoscale and Microscale Structure and Organization of Clouds and Precipitation in Midlatitude Cyclones. VIII: A Model for the “Seeder-Feeder” Process in Warm-Frontal Rainbands , 1983 .

[8]  John C. Kindle,et al.  High resolution modeling and data assimilation in the Monterey Bay area , 2002 .

[9]  P. K. Kundu,et al.  Ekman Veering Observed near the Ocean Bottom , 1976 .

[10]  Lawrence Weiskrantz,et al.  Discussions and conclusions , 1998 .

[11]  Paul J. Martin,et al.  Description of the Navy Coastal Ocean Model Version 1.0 , 2000 .

[12]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  Upwelling response to coastal wind profiles , 2004 .

[13]  Francisco P. Chavez,et al.  A Device for Protecting Moored Spectroradiometers from Biofouling , 2000 .

[14]  Franklin B. Schwing,et al.  Bifurcated flow from an upwelling center: a cold water source for Monterey Bay , 1994 .

[15]  Francisco P. Chavez,et al.  Observations of upwelling and relaxation events in the northern Monterey Bay during August 2000 , 2005 .

[16]  Paul J. Martin,et al.  Navy Real-time Global Modeling Systems , 2002 .

[17]  S. J. Tanner,et al.  Iron, nutrient and phytoplankton biomass relationships in upwelled waters of the California coastal system , 2003 .

[18]  Charlie N. Barron,et al.  The Modular Ocean Data Assimilation System , 2002 .

[19]  F. Chavez,et al.  Biological Heating in the Equatorial Pacific: Observed Variability and Potential for Real-Time Calculation , 2004 .