JASIST special issue on digital humanities (DH)

More than 15 years ago, A Companion to Digital Humanities marked out the area of digital humanities (DH) “as a discipline in its own right” (Schreibman et al., 2004, p. xxiii). In the years that followed, there is ample evidence that the DH domain, formed by the intersection of humanities disciplines and digital information technology, has undergone remarkable expansion. This growth is reflected in A New Companion to Digital Humanities (Schreibman et al., 2016). The extensively revised contents of the second edition were contributed by a global team of authors who are pioneers of innovative research in the field. Over this formative period, DH has become a widely recognized, impactful mode of scholarship and an institutional unit for collaborative, transdisciplinary, and computationally engaged research, teaching, and publication (Burdick et al., 2012; Svensson, 2010; Van Ruyskensvelde, 2014). The field of DH has advanced tremendously over the last decade and continues to expand. Meanwhile, competing definitions and approaches of DH scholars continue to spark debate. “Complexity” was a theme of the DH2019 international conference, as it demonstrates the multifaceted connections within DH scholarship today (Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations, 2019). Yet, while it is often assumed that the DH is in flux and not particularly fixed as an institutional or intellectual construct, there are also obviously touchstones within the DH field, most visibly in the relationship between traditional humanities disciplines and technological infrastructures. Thus, it is still meaningful to “bring together the humanistic and the digital through embracing a nonterritorial and liminal zone” (Svensson, 2016, p. 477). This is the focus of this JASIST special issue, which mirrors the increasing attention on DH worldwide. The goals for this issue are to concentrate attention on DH concepts, theories, methods, and analyses and to showcase the infrastructures of DH and its standard practices, the methodological and technological advancements in DH research, and critical matters that have shaped the development of DH. It also aims to map out a research agenda that identifies critical points of intersection and gaps in knowledge that require collaboration between information science and technologies (IST) professionals and DH scholars, as well as the establishment of a common theoretical framework for understanding key issues and research questions.

[1]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Networks of digital humanities scholars: The informational and social uses and gratifications of Twitter , 2015, Big Data Soc..

[2]  Daniel V. Pitti Designing Sustainable Projects and Publications , 2007 .

[3]  Alex H. Poole,et al.  The conceptual ecology of digital humanities , 2017, J. Documentation.

[4]  Patrik Svensson,et al.  The Landscape of Digital Humanities , 2010, Digit. Humanit. Q..

[5]  Tom Heath,et al.  Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space , 2011, Linked Data.

[6]  Lisa Spiro,et al.  “This Is Why We Fight”: Defining the Values of the Digital Humanities , 2012 .

[7]  Tanya E. Clement,et al.  Connecting theory and practice in digital humanities information work , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  John Unsworth,et al.  A Companion to Digital Humanities , 2008 .

[9]  Melissa Terras,et al.  Enabled backchannel: conference Twitter use by digital humanists , 2011, J. Documentation.

[10]  Julianne Nyhan,et al.  Joint and multi-authored publication patterns in the Digital Humanities , 2014, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[11]  Jin Gao,et al.  The Intellectual Structure of Digital Humanities: An Author Co-Citation Analysis , 2017, DH.

[12]  Yin Zhang,et al.  Digital humanities research: interdisciplinary collaborations, themes and implications to library and information science , 2020, J. Documentation.

[13]  C. Sula,et al.  The early history of digital humanities: An analysis of Computers and the Humanities (1966–2004) and Literary and Linguistic Computing (1986–2004) , 2019, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities.

[14]  S. Schreibman,et al.  A new companion to digital humanities , 2016 .

[15]  Kuang-hua Chen,et al.  A longitudinal study of intellectual cohesion in digital humanities using bibliometric analyses , 2017, Scientometrics.

[16]  Nickoal Eichmann-Kalwara,et al.  The Index of Digital Humanities Conferences , 2021, Journal of Open Humanities Data.

[17]  Julianne Nyhan,et al.  Visualising The Digital Humanities Community: A Comparison Study Between Citation Network And Social Network , 2018, DH.

[18]  Roopika Risam Navigating the Global Digital Humanities: Insights from Black Feminism , 2016 .

[19]  The Promise of the Digital Humanities and the Contested Nature of Digital Scholarship , 2014 .

[20]  P. Svensson Sorting Out the Digital Humanities , 2015 .