Scale efficiency in two-stage network DEA

Abstract Network data envelopment analysis (DEA) considers internal structures of decision-making units. Unlike the standard DEA, network DEA imposes hurdles for measuring scale efficiency due to the fact that (i) overall efficiency aggregated by the stage or divisional technical efficiencies is highly non-linear and only solvable in a heuristic manner, or (ii) the overall efficiency which concerns exclusively inputs and outputs of a system is difficult to be decomposed into divisional efficiencies. In this paper, we establish a mathematical transformation to convert the corresponding non-linear programming problem into second order cone programming programme. The transformation is shown to be versatile in dealing with both constant returns to scale and variable returns to scale models under the two-stage network DEA. Meanwhile, our numerical results reveal that overall scale efficiency in two-stage network DEA is consistent with scale efficiency in conventional DEA.

[1]  H. David Sherman,et al.  Health-Care Applications: From Hospitals to Physicians, from Productive Efficiency to Quality Frontiers , 2011 .

[2]  H. David Sherman,et al.  Health Care Applications , 2004 .

[3]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Yongjun Li,et al.  DEA Models for Extended Two-Stage Network Structures , 2012 .

[5]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Performance evaluation of participating nations at the 2012 London Summer Olympics by a two-stage data envelopment analysis , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model , 2014 .

[7]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  S. Zionts,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1968 .

[9]  Lisa Turner,et al.  Applications of Second Order Cone Programming , 2012 .

[10]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Second order cone programming approach to two-stage network data envelopment analysis , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition , 2008 .

[12]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[15]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Decomposing technical efficiency and scale elasticity in two-stage network DEA , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in two-stage additive network DEA , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[20]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .