Telehealth, Wearable Sensors, and the Internet: Will They Improve Stroke Outcomes Through Increased Intensity of Therapy, Motivation, and Adherence to Rehabilitation Programs?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Stroke, predominantly a condition of older age, is a major cause of acquired disability in the global population and puts an increasing burden on health care resources. Clear evidence for the importance of intensity of therapy in optimizing functional outcomes is found in animal models, supported by neuroimaging and behavioral research, and strengthened by recent meta-analyses from multiple clinical trials. However, providing intensive therapy using conventional treatment paradigms is expensive and sometimes not feasible because of social and environmental factors. This article addresses the need for cost-effective increased intensity of practice and suggests potential benefits of telehealth (TH) as an innovative model of care in physical therapy. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS We provide an overview of TH and present evidence that a web-supported program, used in conjunction with constraint-induced therapy (CIT), can increase intensity and adherence to a rehabilitation regimen. The design and feasibility testing of this web-based program, "LifeCIT," is presented. We describe how wearable sensors can monitor activity and provide feedback to patients and therapists. The methodology for the development of a wearable device with embedded inertial and mechanomyographic sensors, algorithms to classify functional movement, and a graphical user interface to present meaningful data to patients to support a home exercise program is explained. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE We propose that wearable sensor technologies and TH programs have the potential to provide most-effective, intensive, home-based stroke rehabilitation.

[1]  C. Orizio,et al.  The surface mechanomyogram as a tool to describe the influence of fatigue on biceps brachii motor unit activation strategy. Historical basis and novel evidence , 2003, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[2]  Richard Wootton,et al.  Internet-based outpatient telerehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  S. Scalvini,et al.  Home-Based Versus In-Hospital Cardiac Rehabilitation After Cardiac Surgery: A Nonrandomized Controlled Study , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[4]  Mark R Schmeler,et al.  Telerehabilitation position paper. , 2005, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[5]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[6]  Jon Sanford,et al.  Effects of Telerehabilitation on Physical Function and Disability for Stroke Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2012, Stroke.

[7]  A. Eagger Rehabilitation , 1960 .

[8]  Ravi Vaidyanathan,et al.  A heterogeneous framework for real-time decoding of bioacoustic signals: Applications to assistive interfaces and prosthesis control , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  J. Burridge,et al.  Arm Rehabilitation at Home for People with Stroke: Staying Safe: Encouraging Results from the Co-designed LifeCIT Programme , 2017 .

[10]  H. Vet,et al.  Clinimetric Properties of the Motor Activity Log for the Assessment of Arm Use in Hemiparetic Patients , 2004, Stroke.

[11]  S. Nadeau,et al.  Cost Analysis of In-Home Telerehabilitation for Post-Knee Arthroplasty , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  Martin Knapp,et al.  Costing psychiatric interventions. , 1992 .

[13]  L. Moja,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  Janet Brown,et al.  Reimbursement for Telespeech , 2010 .

[15]  Lara A. Boyd,et al.  Is More Better? Using Metadata to Explore Dose–Response Relationships in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2014, Stroke.

[16]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[17]  Deborah Theodoros,et al.  A Blueprint for Telerehabilitation Guidelines , 2010, International journal of telerehabilitation.

[18]  Ravi Vaidyanathan,et al.  Pervasive Motion Tracking and Muscle Activity Monitor , 2014, 2014 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems.

[19]  L. Yardley,et al.  The Person-Based Approach to Intervention Development: Application to Digital Health-Related Behavior Change Interventions , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  H. Corriveau,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty , 2011, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[21]  H. Bussche,et al.  Home-based constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with upper limb dysfunction after stroke (HOMECIMT): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[22]  M. McDonnell,et al.  Self management programmes for quality of life in people with stroke. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[23]  J. Whitall,et al.  Psychometric properties of a modified Wolf Motor Function test for people with mild and moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  V. Feigin,et al.  Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2014, The Lancet.

[25]  C. Wolfe,et al.  Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom. , 2008, Age and ageing.

[26]  Steven L Wolf,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[27]  W. Miller,et al.  A Self-Administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) Improves Arm Function During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Stroke.

[28]  Yuh Jang,et al.  Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Stroke Patients , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[29]  P A Thompson,et al.  The Motor Activity Log-28 , 2006, Neurology.

[30]  E. Topol,et al.  State of Telehealth. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  J. Burridge,et al.  Translation of evidence-based Assistive Technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[32]  G. Turchetti,et al.  Telerehabilitation after total knee replacement in Italy: cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a mixed telerehabilitation-standard rehabilitation programme compared with usual care , 2016, BMJ Open.