The Effect of Learner-Generated Drawing and Imagination in Comprehending a Science Text

ABSTRACT The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of imagination and learner-generated drawing on comprehension, reading time, cognitive load, and eye movements, and whether prior knowledge moderated the effects of these two strategies. Sixty-three undergraduate students participated in a pretest-posttest between-subjects study with the independent variable being the instructional strategies with three levels (learner-generated drawing vs. imagination vs. repeated reading). The results revealed that, compared to repeated reading, learner-generated drawing fostered learners' comprehension when their prior knowledge was relatively low. Moreover, when asked to read the science text after the intervention, learners who were previously engaged with imagination spent significantly more time reading the text, and fixated longer and more frequently than those in the repeated reading condition.

[1]  R. Mayer,et al.  Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. , 2010 .

[2]  Sylvia Blake,et al.  Using Pictures to Assist in Comprehension and Recall , 1994 .

[3]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Learning from Chemical Visualizations: Comparing generation and selection , 2013 .

[4]  A. Richardson.  Mental Practice: A Review and Discussion Part I , 1967 .

[5]  Imagining Instructions: Mental Practice in Highly Cognitive Domains , 2005 .

[6]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[7]  Mark Sadoski,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Reading , 2007 .

[8]  M. Chi,et al.  The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes , 2014 .

[9]  A Meta-Analysis,et al.  Fluency and Comprehension Gains as a Result of Repeated Reading , 2004 .

[10]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[11]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[12]  M. Just,et al.  Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. , 1993 .

[13]  N. Theunissen,et al.  Prospective Educational Applications of Mental Simulation: A Meta-review , 2009 .

[14]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Marcus Nyström,et al.  How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding , 2013 .

[16]  Robert K. Atkinson,et al.  Enhancing Learning from Different Visualizations by Self-Explanation Prompts , 2013 .

[17]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  An exploration of elementary school students' conceptions of learning: A drawing analysis , 2012 .

[18]  Sarah L. Dowhower.  Repeated Reading: Research into Practice. , 1989 .

[19]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[20]  Neil Salkind,et al.  Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh : Analyzing and Understanding Data , 2004 .

[21]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[22]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Expertise in Problem Solving. , 1981 .

[23]  J. Sweller,et al.  Interactions among the imagination, expertise reversal, and element interactivity effects. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[24]  P. V. Meter,et al.  Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. , 2001 .

[25]  J. D. Fletcher,et al.  The Multimedia Principle. , 2005 .

[26]  Björn B. de Koning,et al.  Becoming Part of the Story! Refueling the Interest in Visualization Strategies for Reading Comprehension , 2013 .

[27]  Peggy Noel Van Meter,et al.  Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text , 2006 .

[28]  D. Leutner,et al.  Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarizing as learning strategies , 2012 .

[29]  Slava Kalyuga.  Cognitive Load Theory: Schema Acquisition and Sources of Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[30]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Shaaron E. Ainsworth,et al.  Drawing to Learn in Science , 2011, Science.

[32]  David N. Rapp,et al.  The ‘Ins’ and ‘Outs’ of Learning: Internal Representations and External Visualizations , 2008 .

[33]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[34]  Sharon K Tindall-Ford,et al.  Learning by imagining. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[35]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[36]  A. D. D. Groot.  Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[37]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load and the imagination effect , 2004 .

[38]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Drawing pictures during learning from scientific text: testing the generative drawing effect and the prognostic drawing effect , 2014 .

[39]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Two Kinds and Four Sub-Types of Misconceived Knowledge, Ways to Change it, and the Learning Outcomes , 2013 .

[40]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Self-generated drawings for supporting comprehension of a complex animation , 2013 .

[41]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[42]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Introduction to Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[43]  Rolf Ploetzner,et al.  Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animations , 2010 .

[44]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Unique Contributions of Eye-Tracking Research to the Study of Learning with Graphics , 2010 .

[45]  P. V. Meter,et al.  The Promise and Practice of Learner-Generated Drawing: Literature Review and Synthesis , 2005 .

[46]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  An Imagination Effect in Learning from Scientific Text. , 2015 .

[47]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[48]  John Hansen.  Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and Understanding Data , 2005 .

[49]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[50]  Carolyn Copper,et al.  Does mental practice enhance performance , 1994 .

[51]  William J. Therrien,et al.  Fluency and Comprehension Gains as a Result of Repeated Reading , 2004 .

[52]  R. Cox.  Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences , 1999 .

[53]  Robert K. Atkinson,et al.  Animated agents and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter? , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[54]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[55]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[56]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations , 2011 .

[57]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Effects of visual cues and self-explanation prompts: empirical evidence in a multimedia environment , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[58]  Mina C. Johnson-Glenberg,et al.  Training reading comprehension in adequate decoders/poor comprehenders: Verbal versus visual strategies , 2000 .

[59]  P. Chandler,et al.  When imagining information is effective , 2003 .

[60]  Slava Kalyuga.  Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction , 2007 .