The GP problem: Quantifying gene-to-phenotype relationships

In this paper we refer to the gene-to-phenotype modeling challenge as the GP problem. Integrating information across levels of organization within a genotype-environment system is a major challenge in computational biology. However, resolving the GP problem is a fundamental requirement if we are to understand and predict phenotypes given knowledge of the genome and model dynamic properties of biological systems. Organisms are consequences of this integration, and it is a major property of biological systems that underlies the responses we observe. We discuss the E(NK) model as a framework for investigation of the GP problem and the prediction of system properties at different levels of organization. We apply this quantitative framework to an investigation of the processes involved in genetic improvement of plants for agriculture. In our analysis, N genes determine the genetic variation for a set of traits that are responsible for plant adaptation to E environment-types within a target population of environments. The N genes can interact in epistatic NK gene-networks through the way that they influence plant growth and development processes within a dynamic crop growth model. We use a sorghum crop growth model, available within the APSIM agricultural production systems simulation model, to integrate the gene-environment interactions that occur during growth and development and to predict genotype-to-phenotype relationships for a given E(NK) model. Directional selection is then applied to the population of genotypes, based on their predicted phenotypes, to simulate the dynamic aspects of genetic improvement by a plant-breeding program. The outcomes of the simulated breeding are evaluated across cycles of selection in terms of the changes in allele frequencies for the N genes and the genotypic and phenotypic values of the populations of genotypes.

[1]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[2]  D. Falconer Introduction to quantitative genetics. 1. ed. , 1984 .

[3]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[4]  G. Hammer,et al.  The economic theory of water and nitrogen dynamics and management in field crops , 2001 .

[5]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. III. Temporal sequences and spatial patterns in the target population of environments , 2000 .

[6]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems research , 1996 .

[7]  Dean Podlich,et al.  Evaluating Plant Breeding Strategies by Simulating Gene Action and Dryland Environment Effects , 2003, Agronomy Journal.

[8]  G. Hammer,et al.  Genotype-by-Environment Interaction in Grain Sorghum. II. Effects of Temperature and Photoperiod on Ontogeny , 1989 .

[9]  S. Chapman,et al.  Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. I. Characteristics that confound interpretation of hybrid yield , 2000 .

[10]  J. Casti Would-Be Worlds: How Simulation Is Changing the Frontiers of Science , 1996 .

[11]  Mark Cooper,et al.  Using clusters of computers for large QU-GENE simulation experiments , 2001, Bioinform..

[12]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of different seasonal patterns of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields. , 2000 .

[13]  R. Frankham Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn): by Douglas S. Falconer and Trudy F.C. Mackay Longman, 1996. £24.99 pbk (xv and 464 pages) ISBN 0582 24302 5 , 1996 .

[14]  John L. Casti,et al.  Paradigms Lost: Images of Man in the Mirror of Science , 1991 .

[15]  Trudy F. C. Mackay,et al.  Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[17]  G. Hammer,et al.  Genotype and Water Limitation Effects on Transpiration Efficiency in Sorghum , 2000 .

[18]  W. J. Ridgman Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding , 2nd edn. By A. R. Hallauer & J. B. Miranda Filho. xii+468 pages. Ames: Iowa State University Press. 1988. Price (hard covers) US $44.95. ISBN 0 8138 1522 3. , 1989, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[19]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Evaluating Plant Breeding Strategies by Simulating Gene Action and Dryland Environment Effects , 2003, Agronomy Journal.

[20]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Modelling plant breeding programs , 1999 .

[21]  A. Clark,et al.  Limits to Prediction of Phenotypes from Knowledge of Genotypes , 2000 .

[22]  C. Mcintyre,et al.  Construction of a genetic map in a sorghum recombinant inbred line using probes from different sources and its comparison with other sorghum maps (vol 49, pg 729, 1998) , 1998 .

[23]  P D Karp,et al.  Pathway Databases: A Case Study in Computational Symbolic Theories , 2001, Science.

[24]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Assessing climatic risk to sorghum production in water-limited subtropical environments. I.Development and testing of a simulation model , 1994 .

[25]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  The physiological basis of genotype by environment interaction in crop adaptation. , 1996 .

[26]  G. Hammer,et al.  On the extent of genetic variation for transpiration efficiency in sorghum , 1997 .

[27]  D. Butler,et al.  Identification of genomic regions associated with stay green in sorghum by testing RILs in multiple environments , 2000, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[28]  R. Comstock Quantitative Genetics with Special Reference to Plant and Animal Breeding , 1996 .

[29]  Mark Cooper,et al.  QU-GENE: a simulation platform for quantitative analysis of genetic models , 1998, Bioinform..

[30]  G. Hammer,et al.  Nitrogen Dynamics and the Physiological Basis of Stay‐Green in Sorghum , 2000 .

[31]  G. Hammer,et al.  Using crop simulation to generate genotype by environment interaction effects for sorghum in water-limited environments , 2002 .