Procedures for Sampling Texts and Tasks in Kindergarten through Eighth Grade. Technical Report No. 30.

An understanding of how children interact with reading material in educational settings is crucial to an understanding of our successes and failures at teaching children to become skilled readers. A possible first step in attaining this knowledge is the collection of a corpus obtained by the systematic observation, description, and coding of reading activities in a sample of classrooms. In the present report we relate the development of a plan for collecting such a corpus, including a system for coding observation, procedures for sampling classrooms, and methods for indexing and accessing the corpus. Special emphasis is given to the development of the observational system. This system is intended to provide a unified, information-rich description of classroom reading activities and the reading materials involved. We have made a preliminary analysis of the changes in reading activities and reading materials which might be expected to occur between the lower (K-3) and middle (4-8) grades, and considered the feasibility of detecting such changes in a corpus of coded observations. Finally, after weighing the costs and benefits of collecting a representative corpus, we concluded that current needs, both theoretical and applied, might be better served by small studies focused on specific questions. Sampling Texts and Tasks 2 From its conception, the Center for the Study of Reading has been charged with spearheading a broadly based, multlfaceted attack on the problem of the development of skilled reading. One aspect of this mandate was to develop a plan for sampling the written discourse which children experience in the early and middle grades together with the different types of tasks associated with the discourse. In this report, we outline the development of an observational system which was designed for the collection of such a sample. We wish to stress at the outset that our major responsibility was the development and evaluation of a plan for sampling texts and tasks. Thus, the observational system described in this report is iot a fully developed instrument. We have, however, listed changes and modifications which would be required before Implementation. We discuss how the sample might be collected, compiled, and analyzed in order to detect changes in texts and tasks between the early and middle grades. Finally, we consider alternatives to our observational system and conclude that reading research would be better served by small studies focused on particular questions than by an omnibus sample of texts and tasks. We began with the intention of developing both observational and survey methods of sampling texts and tasks. However, as we came to a fuller understanding of the issues, we realized that the level of detail necessary and the diversity of texts and tasks to be found in the schools would make the use of survey methods impractical. We have therefore concentrated most of our efforts on the development and testing of an observational system. In this paper we recount this development, from Sampling Texts and Tasks

[1]  Glenn M. Kleiman,et al.  The Effect of Previous Context on Reading Individual Words. Technical Report No. 20. , 1977 .

[2]  E. W. Morris No , 1923, The Hospital and health review.

[3]  Robert Michael Schwartz,et al.  Relation of Context Utilization and Orthographic Automaticity in Word Identification. , 1977 .

[4]  J. L. Morgan,et al.  Two Types of Convention in Indirect Speech Acts. Technical Report No. 52. , 1977 .

[5]  Joseph R. Jenkins,et al.  Effects of Contextualized and Decontextualized Practice Conditions on Word Recognition , 1977 .

[6]  B. Nash-webber Anaphora : a cross disciplinary survey , 1977 .

[7]  W. Brewer,et al.  Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[8]  D. Rumelhart NOTES ON A SCHEMA FOR STORIES , 1975 .

[9]  Donald A. Trismen A Descriptive and Analytic Study of Compensatory Reading Programs. Final Report. Volume II. , 1976 .

[10]  D. Bobrow,et al.  Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science , 1975 .

[11]  Joseph R. Jenkins,et al.  Curriculum Biases in Reading Achievement Tests. Technical Report No. 16. , 1976 .

[12]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[13]  Erica F. McClure,et al.  Aspects of Code-Switching in the Discourse of Bilingual Mexican-American Children. Technical Report No. 44. , 1977 .

[14]  Bonnie B. Armbruster,et al.  Analyzing Content Coverage and Emphasis: A Study of Three Curricula and Two Tests. Technical Report No. 26. , 1977 .

[15]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge , 1978 .

[16]  Joseph R. Jenkins,et al.  Learning Word Meanings: A Comparison of Instructional Procedures , 1977 .

[17]  Jean Spealman Kujoth Best-Selling Children's Books , 1973 .

[18]  Ann L. Brown Theories of Memory and the Problems of Development: Activity, Growth, and Knowledge. Technical Report No. 51. , 1977 .

[19]  G W McConkie,et al.  What is recalled after hearing a passage? , 1973, Journal of educational psychology.

[20]  Martin A. Siegel Teacher behaviors and curriculum packages : implications for research and teacher education , 1976 .

[21]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Two faces of the conceptual peg hypothesis , 1977 .

[22]  Victor H. Yngve,et al.  A model and an hypothesis for language structure , 1960 .

[23]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  The development of strategies for studying prose passages , 1977 .

[24]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Failures to Comprehend and Levels of Processing in Reading. Technical Report No. 37. , 1977 .

[25]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The representation of meaning in memory , 1974 .

[26]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  Anaphora and Logical Form: On Formal Meaning Representations for Natural Language , 1977, IJCAI.

[27]  Thomas H. Anderson,et al.  Computer assisted problem solving in an introductory statistics course , 1977 .

[28]  A. Collins,et al.  A schema-theoretic view of reading , 1977 .

[29]  Harvey Frommer Rapid Reading, Yes. , 1971 .

[30]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  Names, descriptions, and pragmatics , 1976 .

[31]  William A. Woods,et al.  Multiple theory formation in high-level perception , 1977 .

[32]  Carl H Frederiksen,et al.  Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourse , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Ann L. Brown Knowing When, Where, and How to Remember: A Problem of Metacognition. Technical Report No. 47. , 1977 .

[34]  B. Meyer The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[35]  Diane L. Schallert,et al.  Improving Memory for Prose: The Relationship between Depth of Processing and Context. Technical Report No. 5. , 1975 .

[36]  Ann L. Brown The effects of experience on the selection of suitable retrieval cues for studying from prose passages , 1977 .

[37]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  Remembering and understanding jaberwocky and small-talk , 1977 .

[38]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schemata as Scaffolding for the Representation of Information in Connected Discourse , 1977 .

[39]  Richard C. Anderson Schema-Directed Processes in Language Comprehension , 1978 .

[40]  Jana M. Mason,et al.  Questioning the Notion of Independent Processing Stages in Reading. , 1977 .

[41]  Jana M. Mason,et al.  Reading Readiness: A Definition and Skills Hierarchy from Preschoolers' Developing Conceptions of Print. Technical Report No. 59. , 1977 .

[42]  Stephen M. Alessi,et al.  Hardware and software considerations in computer based course management , 1976 .