Assessment of seasonal change in a young aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) canopy using digital imagery

Abstract Direct and indirect measurements of leaf area distribution during the 2001-growing season were used to characterize the structure of a small aspen grove in relict grassland of the northern Great Plains. Located in the Kernen Prairie near Saskatoon, the 1.5 ha grove had last been burned in October 1986. Measurements included solar radiation inside and outside the grove; digital hemispheric images of the tree canopy taken bi-weekly, and mean areas of individual leaves at three canopy heights. The images were processed using Idrisi® digital-image processing software designed for geographical information system (GIS) applications. Leaf size averaged near 5 cm 2 , varying little through the summer, although larger leaves were proportionally more abundant in the upper canopy early in the growing season. Hemispherical cover increased rapidly in early May from about 40% (no leaves) to about 80% (fully leafed), dropping back to the earlier value after leaf fall in late September and early October. Solar radiation under the canopy dropped from 55% of ambient before the first leaves appeared to 25% during most of the summer, increasing to near 50% by late October. Calculated plant (leaf plus stem) area indices increased from about 0.4 in the leafless phase to near 1.7 during the full-leaf stage in late June. Digital imagery analysis provided a rapid assessment of canopy structure. This may be useful for long-term monitoring of stand responses to different management techniques.

[1]  H. Mooney,et al.  Modeling the Exchanges of Energy, Water, and Carbon Between Continents and the Atmosphere , 1997, Science.

[2]  William E. Reifsnyder,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of solar radiation beneath forest canopies , 1970 .

[3]  D. Coombe,et al.  Hemisperical and Woodland Canopy Photography and the Light Climate , 1959 .

[4]  T. A. Black,et al.  Radiation regime and canopy architecture in a boreal aspen forest , 1997 .

[5]  N. Debyle,et al.  Aspen : Ecology and Management in the Western United States , 1985 .

[6]  J. Welles,et al.  Canopy structure measurement by gap fraction analysis using commercial instrumentation , 1996 .

[7]  M. Scholl,et al.  A quantitative description of a deciduous forest canopy using a photographic technique. , 1990 .

[8]  K. Stadt,et al.  Growth of understory Piceaglauca, Calamagrostiscanadensis, and Epilobiumangustifolium in relation to overstory light transmission , 1994 .

[9]  T. J. Dean,et al.  Bunchgrass architecture, light interception, and water-use efficiency: assessment by fiber optic point quadrats and gas exchange , 1983, Oecologia.

[10]  A. Groot,et al.  Microclimate of clear-cut, forest interior, and small openings in trembling aspen forest , 1997 .

[11]  Margaret C. Anderson.  Studies of the Woodland Light Climate: I. The Photographic Computation of Light Conditions , 1964 .

[12]  T. Kozlowski,et al.  SHOOT GROWTH CHARACTERISTICS OF HETEROPHYLLOUS WOODY PLANTS , 1966 .

[13]  John M. Norman,et al.  Measurements of leaf orientation, light distribution and sunlit leaf area in a boreal aspen forest , 1998 .

[14]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .

[15]  R. Hall,et al.  A comparison of digital and film fisheye photography for analysis of forest canopy structure and gap light transmission , 2001 .

[16]  O. W. Archibold,et al.  Comparison of the microclimates of a small aspen grove and adjacent prairie in Saskatchewan , 1996 .

[17]  J. R. Donnelly.  Seasonal changes in photosynthate transport within elongating shoots of Populus grandidentata , 1974 .

[18]  P. Comeau,et al.  A comparison of several methods for estimating light under a paper birch mixedwood stand , 1998 .

[19]  D. Pollard.  Leaf area development on different shoot types in a young aspen stand and its effect upon production , 1970 .

[20]  Philip J. Radtke,et al.  Laser point-quadrat sampling for estimating foliage-height profiles in broad-leaved forests , 2001 .

[21]  O. W. Archibold,et al.  Effects of burning on prairie aspen grove microclimate , 1999 .

[22]  J. N. Long,et al.  Influence of stand density on log quality of lodgepole pine , 1988 .

[23]  F. Bazzaz.  The Physiological Ecology of Plant Succession , 1979 .

[24]  Roger C. Anderson,et al.  Savannas, Barrens, and Rock Outcrop Plant Communities of North America: CENTRAL/MIDWEST REGION , 1999 .

[25]  D. Pollard.  Mortality and Annual Changes in Distribution of Above-Ground Biomass in an Aspen Sucker Stand , 1971 .

[26]  P. Rich.  Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. , 1990 .

[27]  T. Spies,et al.  Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests , 1990 .

[28]  J. W. Wilson,et al.  Stand Structure and Light Penetration. I. Analysis by Point Quadrats , 1965 .

[29]  Hans Lambers,et al.  Plant Physiological Ecology , 1998, Springer New York.

[30]  D. Clark,et al.  Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments. , 2000 .

[31]  G. A. Schier,et al.  Role of Carbohydrate Reserves in the Development of Root Suckers in Populustremuloides , 1973 .