Spontaneous Giving under Structural Inequality: Intuition Promotes Cooperation in Asymmetric Social Dilemmas

The present research investigates the role of intuitive mental processing on cooperation in experimental games involving structural inequality. Results from an experiment using conceptual priming to induce intuitive mental processing provide the first evidence that cooperation is promoted by intuition in an asymmetric context that distributes the gains from cooperation unequally among a group. Therefore, the results extend our understanding of the cognitive underpinnings of human cooperation by demonstrating the robustness of intuitive cooperation in games involving structural inequality regarding asymmetric gains from cooperation. Additionally, the results provide the first successful conceptual replication of the intuition-cooperation link using conceptual priming, therefore also contributing to the debate about the validity of previous research in other contexts. Taken together, the present research contributes to the literature on psychological and institutional mechanisms that promote cooperation.

[1]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[2]  Will M. Gervais,et al.  Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief , 2012, Science.

[3]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[4]  Fangfang Tan,et al.  Punishment in a Linear Public Good Game with Productivity Heterogeneity , 2008 .

[5]  W. Güth,et al.  Leading by example with and without exclusion power in voluntary contribution experiments , 2007 .

[6]  David G. Rand,et al.  Humans Display a 'Cooperative Phenotype' that is Domain General and Temporally Stable , 2014 .

[7]  Robert J. Oxoby,et al.  A Clear and Present Minority: Heterogeneity in the Source of Endowments and the Provision of Public Goods , 2013 .

[8]  Todd L. Cherry,et al.  The Impact of Endowment Heterogeneity and Origin on Public Good Contributions: Evidence From the Lab , 2005 .

[9]  James Konow,et al.  Fair Air: Distributive Justice and Environmental Economics , 2010 .

[10]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social Context and the Dynamics of Cooperative Choice , 2014 .

[11]  R. Trivers.  The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[12]  David G. Rand,et al.  Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[13]  Lisa R. Anderson,et al.  Inequality and public good provision: An experimental analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Axel Ockenfels,et al.  Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[16]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Intuition and cooperation reconsidered , 2013, Nature.

[17]  David G. Rand,et al.  Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[19]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[20]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[21]  Cooperation Is Relative: Income and Framing Effects with Public Goods , 2012 .

[22]  Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen,et al.  Does Intuition Cause Cooperation? , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[24]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Rand et al. reply , 2013, Nature.

[25]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  D. Simons.  The Value of Direct Replication , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[27]  Reaction times and reflection in social dilemmas: Extreme responses are fast, but not intuitive , 2014 .

[28]  S. Schmidt.  Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences , 2009 .

[29]  Florian Wakolbinger,et al.  To lead or not to lead: Endogenous sequencing in public goods games , 2010 .

[30]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in rational thought. , 1998 .

[31]  P. Richerson,et al.  The evolution of indirect reciprocity , 1989 .

[32]  P. Meehl.  Why Summaries of Research on Psychological Theories are Often Uninterpretable , 1990 .

[33]  Erling Moxnes,et al.  Leading by Example? Investment Decisions in a Mixed Sequential-Simultaneous Public Bad Experiment , 2003 .

[34]  Verena Utikal,et al.  Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load , 2014 .

[35]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  On feeling good and getting your way: mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  David G. Rand,et al.  Time Pressure Increases Cooperation in Competitively Framed Social Dilemmas , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[38]  N. McGlynn.  Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[39]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Life after P-Hacking , 2013 .

[40]  J. Forgas,et al.  When happiness makes us selfish, but sadness makes us fair: Affective influences on interpersonal strategies in the dictator game , 2010 .

[41]  J. Ledyard.  Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research , 1994 .

[42]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[43]  David G. Rand,et al.  Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity , 2005, Nature.

[45]  H. Pashler,et al.  Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[46]  D. Wilson.  A theory of group selection. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  S. Frederick.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[48]  T. Okimoto,et al.  Punitive versus compensatory reactions to injustice: Emotional antecedents to third-party interventions , 2011 .

[49]  J. Forgas,et al.  On feeling good and getting your way: mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  M. Sutter,et al.  The benefits of voluntary leadership in experimental public goods games , 2011 .

[51]  David G. Rand,et al.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed , 2012, Nature.

[52]  Siegfried Dewitte,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Are Social Value Orientations Expressed Automatically? Decision Making in the Dictator Game on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .

[53]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Affective and cognitive influences in social dilemma game , 1994 .

[54]  Dent,et al.  Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[55]  R. Mark Isaac,et al.  Heterogenous demand for public goods: Behavior in the voluntary contributions mechanism , 1995 .

[56]  Erling Moxnes,et al.  The Effect of Leadership in a Public Bad Experiment , 2000 .

[57]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[58]  D. DeSteno,et al.  Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior , 2006, Psychological science.