Optimizing K2 trees: A case for validating the maturity of network of practices

Of late there has been considerable interest in the efficient and effective storage of large-scale network graphs, such as those within the domains of social networks, web and virtual communities. The representation of these data graphs is a complex and challenging task and arises as a result of the inherent structural and dynamic properties of a community network, whereby naturally occurring churn can severely affect the ability to optimize the network structure. Since the organization of the network will change over time, we consider how an established method for storing large data graphs (K^2 tree) can be augmented and then utilized as an indicator of the relative maturity of a community network. Within this context, we present an algorithm and a series of experimental results upon both real and simulated networks, illustrating that the compression effectiveness reduces as the community network structure becomes more dynamic. It is for this reason we highlight a notable opportunity to explore the relevance between the K^2 tree optimization factor with the maturity level of the network community concerned.

[1]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  An empirical study of the driving forces behind online communities , 2009, Internet Res..

[2]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  GConnect: A Connectivity Index for Massive Disk-resident Graphs , 2009, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[3]  Gregory Buehrer,et al.  A scalable pattern mining approach to web graph compression with communities , 2008, WSDM '08.

[4]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  The role of Internet in the development of future software projects , 2010, Internet Res..

[5]  E. Wenger Communities of practice: Learning , 1998 .

[6]  Sebastiano Vigna,et al.  The Webgraph framework II: codes for the World-Wide Web , 2004, Data Compression Conference, 2004. Proceedings. DCC 2004.

[7]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Silvio Lattanzi,et al.  On compressing social networks , 2009, KDD.

[9]  Geoffrey Zweig,et al.  Syntactic Clustering of the Web , 1997, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  The Stanford GraphBase - a platform for combinatorial computing , 1993 .

[11]  Hanan Samet,et al.  The Quadtree and Related Hierarchical Data Structures , 1984, CSUR.

[12]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[13]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Min-Wise Independent Permutations , 2000, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[14]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Some simplified NP-complete problems , 1974, STOC '74.

[15]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[17]  Justin P. Johnson Collaboration, Peer Review and Open Source Software , 2004 .

[18]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[19]  M. Xiong,et al.  Network quotients: structural skeletons of complex systems. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Sebastiano Vigna,et al.  The webgraph framework I: compression techniques , 2004, WWW '04.

[21]  조남욱 전자/제조업의 Collaboration 전략 , 2003 .

[22]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Some Simplified NP-Complete Graph Problems , 1976, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[23]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Discovering Large Dense Subgraphs in Massive Graphs , 2005, VLDB.

[24]  Justin P. Johnson,et al.  Collaboration, Peer Review and Open Source Software , 2004, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[25]  Gonzalo Navarro,et al.  k2-Trees for Compact Web Graph Representation , 2009, SPIRE.