Statistical Analysis of Solutions from the Sixth AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop.

A graphical framework is used for the statistical analysis of the results from an extensive N-version test of a collection of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes computational fluid dynamics codes for ...

[1]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Data Summary from Second AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop , 2003 .

[2]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Development of a Common Research Model for Applied CFD Validation Studies , 2008 .

[3]  Melissa B. Rivers,et al.  Further Investigation of the Support System Effects and Wing Twist on the NASA Common Research Model , 2012 .

[4]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Summary of Data from the Sixth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop: Case 1 Code Verification. , 2017, Journal of aircraft.

[5]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Summary of Data from the Fifth Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop , 2014 .

[6]  Joseph H. Morrison,et al.  Statistical Analysis of CFD Solutions from the Fourth AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop , 2010 .

[7]  Michael J. Hemsch,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Computational Fluid Dynamics Solutions from the Drag Prediction Workshop , 2004 .

[8]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Summary of the Fourth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop , 2010 .

[9]  J. Tukey,et al.  Variations of Box Plots , 1978 .

[10]  Joseph H. Morrison,et al.  Statistical Analysis of CFD Solutions from the Third AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop (Invited) , 2007 .

[11]  Joseph H. Morrison,et al.  Statistical Analysis of CFD Solutions from 2nd Drag Prediction Workshop (Invited) , 2004 .

[12]  J. Hintze,et al.  Violin plots : A box plot-density trace synergism , 1998 .

[13]  David Hue,et al.  Fifth Drag Prediction Workshop: ONERA Investigations with Experimental Wing Twist and Laminarity , 2014 .

[14]  Joseph H. Morrison,et al.  Statistical Analysis of CFD Solutions from the Fifth AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop , 2013 .