Diffusion pattern analysis for social networking sites using small-world network multiple influence model

Despite the rapid proliferation of social networking sites (SNSs), most of the relevant research remains at the level of the analysis of their apparent characteristics. The kernel of the question, though, is the causal relationship between those characteristics and their diffusion patterns. Even though it is axiomatic that SNS diffusion patterns are highly affected by SNS characteristics, there has been little research focusing on the influence of the latter on the former. In response to this research lacuna, the present study aimed, first, to find key SNS characteristics that can be directly related to their diffusion patterns; second, to classify existing SNSs according to those derived characteristics, and finally, to examine whether the different types of SNS actually lead to distinct diffusion patterns or not. SNS diffusion patterns were analyzed using the Small-World Network Multiple Influence (SWMI) model which can explain the characteristics of social systems. The analysis results show that SNSs having a high degree of relationship extension represent a high-connection probability to users not already connected, and also, that SNSs having a high degree of shared interest have a relatively stronger external effect than other SNSs.

[1]  Nina D. Ziv,et al.  An Exploration on Mobile Social Networking: Dodgeball as a Case in Point , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Mobile Business.

[2]  Stephen M. Millett,et al.  The future of scenarios: challenges and opportunities , 2003 .

[3]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  How much do you tell?: information disclosure behaviour indifferent types of online communities , 2009, C&T.

[4]  Joanne Sneddon,et al.  Modelling the faddish, fashionable and efficient diffusion of agricultural technologies: A case study of the diffusion of wool testing technology in Australia , 2011 .

[5]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[6]  B. Wellman.  Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking , 2001 .

[7]  E.J. Westlake,et al.  Friend Me if You Facebook: Generation Y and Performative Surveillance , 2008, The Drama Review.

[8]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Indirect Network Effects in the Market for Personal Digital Assistants , 2004 .

[9]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The Impact of Alternative Communication Channels on the Election Cycle and Beyond. , 2006 .

[10]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  P. Green,et al.  Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects , 2001 .

[12]  Nicoletta Corrocher,et al.  The adoption of Web 2.0 services: An empirical investigation , 2011 .

[13]  Jaz Hee-jeong Choi,et al.  Living in Cyworld: Contextualising Cy-Ties in South Korea , 2006 .

[14]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[15]  Lauri Frank,et al.  An analysis of the effect of the economic situation on modeling and forecasting the diffusion of wireless communications in Finland , 2004 .

[16]  John D. Leckenby,et al.  A Structural Solution to Communication Dilemmas in a Virtual Community , 2007 .

[17]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  A social network caught in the Web , 2003, First Monday.

[18]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Maureen Tanner,et al.  Social capital: the benefit of Facebook ‘friends’ , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[20]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[21]  C. Chu,et al.  The forecasting of the mobile Internet in Taiwan by diffusion model , 2008 .

[22]  M. Sarvary,et al.  Staged estimation of international diffusion models - An application to global cellular telephone adoption , 1998 .

[23]  A. Lee Gilbert,et al.  Understanding mobile data services adoption: Demography, attitudes or needs? , 2005 .

[24]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  Forecasting customer switching intention in mobile service: An exploratory study of predictive factors in mobile number portability , 2008 .

[25]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions , 2010 .

[26]  Susan B. Barnes,et al.  A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States , 2006, First Monday.

[27]  Peter Trkman,et al.  Bass Model Estimates for Broadband Diffusion in European Countries , 2012 .

[28]  Chieh-Peng Lin,et al.  Modeling IT relationship quality and its determinants: A potential perspective of network externalities in e-service , 2011 .

[29]  A. Enders,et al.  The long tail of social networking.: Revenue models of social networking sites , 2008 .

[30]  V. R. Milačić,et al.  Artificial intelligence—morphological approach as a new technological forecasting technique , 1986 .

[31]  G. Tellis,et al.  Does Quality Win? Network Effects versus Quality in High-Tech Markets , 2009 .

[32]  David Gefen,et al.  Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Rhythms of social interaction: messaging within a massive online network , 2006, ArXiv.

[34]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Software Piracy: Estimation of Lost Sales and the Impact on Software Diffusion , 1995 .

[35]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Roadmapping a disruptive technology: A case study: The emerging microsystems and top-down nanosystems industry , 2004 .

[36]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  Demand forecasting for new media services with consideration of competitive relationships using the competitive Bass model and the theory of the niche , 2012 .

[37]  M. Guidolin,et al.  Cross-country diffusion of photovoltaic systems: Modelling choices and forecasts for national adoption patterns , 2010 .

[38]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[39]  Sang-Chan Park,et al.  Service-oriented Technology Roadmap (SoTRM) using patent map for R&D strategy of service industry , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[41]  Luiz C.M. Miranda,et al.  Technology substitution and innovation adoption: The cases of imaging and mobile communication markets , 2013 .

[42]  Joseph Bonneau,et al.  The Privacy Jungle: On the Market for Data Protection in Social Networks , 2009, WEIS.

[43]  Taejin Jung,et al.  Motivations and Self-Presentation Strategies on Korean-Based "Cyworld" Weblog Format Personal Homepages , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[44]  N. I. Shaikh,et al.  Modeling the Diffusion of Innovations Through Small-World Networks , 2010 .

[45]  Bo Xie,et al.  Using the Internet for Offline Relationship Formation , 2007 .

[46]  Fred Phillips,et al.  On S-curves and tipping points , 2007 .

[47]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  First in, First out? The Effects of Network Externalities on Pioneer Survival , 2004 .

[48]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[49]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[50]  Eitan Muller,et al.  The Diffusion of Services , 2009 .

[51]  Laura E. Buffardi,et al.  Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[52]  Yoojung Kim,et al.  Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  Jinhyung Kim,et al.  Technology trends analysis and forecasting application based on decision tree and statistical feature analysis , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[54]  Robert E. Miller,et al.  Students and social networking sites: the posting paradox , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[55]  Charles R. O'Neal.  New approaches to technological forecasting-- Morphological analysis: An integrative approach , 1970 .

[56]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  Why People Use Social Networking Sites , 2009, HCI.

[57]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  The Revolution Will be Networked , 2010 .

[58]  Samuel J. Best,et al.  Online Interactions and Social Capital , 2006 .

[59]  Shung-Ming Tang,et al.  Innovation: web 2.0, online-communities and mobile social networking , 2009 .

[60]  F. Bass.  A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[61]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[62]  Shyhtsun Felix Wu,et al.  Measuring message propagation and social influence on Twitter.com , 2013, Int. J. Commun. Networks Distributed Syst..

[63]  Qing Xia,et al.  Preliminary exploration on low-carbon technology roadmap of Chinas power sector , 2011 .

[64]  Philip Hans Franses,et al.  Indirect Network Effects in New Product Growth. , 2007 .

[65]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Assessing the relationship between the user-based market share and unit sales-based market share for pirated software brands in competitive markets , 1997 .