The Virtual Research Laboratory: Taxonomy and Analysis

Government laboratories and industrial research organizations often choose to outsource research and development (R&D) services to other entities. They may do this to reduce costs, or to gain access to unique capabilities that would be difficult to assemble and maintain in-house. They may manage the process at arm's length, or may choose to be more actively involved. A virtual laboratory is a tightly-knit form of R&D outsourcing with authoritative joint management processes. The central organization is involved in the execution and management of the research to such an extent - and the various partners have such a depth of commitment and coordination - that the collaboration looks almost as if everyone belonged to a single institution. A virtual laboratory occupies the middle ground between performing research in-house on the one hand and issuing typical research contracts to external organizations on the other hand. There have been various examples of successful virtual laboratories. One such example was the relationship between the Rockwell Scientific Company and The Boeing Company, in which the former acted as a virtual research division of the latter for several years. Another example was the Federated Laboratory structure of the Army Research Laboratory (ARL). Under this structure, virtual divisions were actively led by a government research institution (i.e., the ARL), which was also an important active participant in the research. Virtual laboratories are more likely to succeed when they are given high-level executive priority at all participating organizations, have dedicated managers at each division, provide stable multi-year funding, and have some centralized control of incentives for researchers.

[1]  George Kozmetsky,et al.  R&D Collaboration on Trial: The Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation , 1994 .

[2]  B. Pacitti,et al.  Organisational networks in R&D , 1996, IEMC 96 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies.

[3]  B. James Starr Stimulating Simulating , 1973 .

[4]  Edward A. Brown,et al.  Reinventing Government Research and Development: A Status Report on Management Initiatives and Reinvention Efforts at the Army Research Laboratory , 1998 .

[5]  Ann Thayer OUTSOURCING R&D TO GAIN AN EDGE , 1997 .

[6]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  When is Virtual Virtuous? Organizing for Innovation , 1999 .

[7]  Shin-Ichi Shin-Ichi Arimura Global R&D management: the case study of Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. and Sony Corporation , 1997, Innovation in Technology Management. The Key to Global Leadership. PICMET '97.

[8]  G. Tassey The Economics of R&D Policy , 1997 .

[9]  Dominic Lenton Speaking of Wi-Fi , 2003 .

[10]  Martha G. Russell The "virtual laboratory": alliances for technology transfer , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Sam Kurokawa,et al.  Technology Outsourcing in the U.S. and Japan , 2002 .

[12]  Merrill S. Brenner,et al.  Managers at Work: You Can Measure External Research Programs , 2001 .

[13]  M. S. Vassiliou The ARL Displays FedLab: a partnership between industry, government and academia , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[14]  R. Varma Changing Research Cultures in U.S. Industry , 2000 .

[15]  Kathleen M. Buyers,et al.  The Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation , 1989 .

[16]  E. Dargent,et al.  Electrical simulation of Thermally Stimulated Depolarization Current Experiments , 1997 .

[17]  Miguel Castro,et al.  Managing R&D alliances within government: the "virtual agency" concept , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[18]  Sadanori Arimura,et al.  How Matsushita Electric and Sony Manage Global R&D , 1999 .

[19]  David E. Thompson Get Big Enough (But Not Too Big) To Source Innovation , 2001 .