Behavioral Principles of Interlimb Coordination

Interference in interlimb coordination is informative with respect to the underlying mechanisms of coordination. A rather comprehensive functional model of bimanual interlimb coordination, in which it is assumed that interference between the limbs may emerge at different levels of motor control, i.e. motor programming and movement execution, was proposed by Spijkers and Heuer (1995). Central to this model is the hypothesis of transient crosstalk during programming of movement parameters in bimanual coordination tasks. A series of experiments is presented, providing support for the model. These studies are based on three prototypical movement tasks in which several movement variables were examined, such as movement amplitude, isometric force and movement direction. It is concluded that the distinction between an execution level and a programming level may not be sufficient to capture all phenomena of intermanual interactions and, therefore, a third “cognitive” level is needed.

[1]  W Spijkers,et al.  Temporal coordination of alternative and simultaneous aiming movements of constrained timing structure , 1994, Psychological research.

[2]  J. Kelso,et al.  A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  H. Heuer,et al.  Parametric coupling and generalized decoupling revealed by concurrent and successive isometric contractions of distal muscles. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: specification interference as revealed by reaction time , 1997 .

[5]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[7]  D Goodman,et al.  On the coordination of two-handed movements. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Neural bases of motor behaviour , 1996 .

[9]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[10]  D J Glencross,et al.  The effect of temporal and force changes on the patterning of sequential movements , 1993, Psychological research.

[11]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Bimanual Movement Control: Information processing and Interaction Effects , 1984 .

[12]  H Heuer,et al.  Structural constraints on bimanual movements , 1993, Psychological research.

[13]  B. Fowler,et al.  The Coordination of Bimanual Aiming Movements: Evidence for Progressive Desynchronization , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  J. I. Todor,et al.  EXERTION LEVEL AND THE INTENSITY OF ASSOCIATED MOVEMENTS , 1986, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[15]  D E Sherwood Practice and assimilation effects in a multilimb aiming task. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  H Heuer,et al.  Eccentric head positions bias random generation of leftward and rightward handle-bar rotations. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[17]  H Heuer,et al.  Visual discrimination and response programming , 1987, Psychological research.

[18]  S P Swinnen,et al.  Kinetic attraction during bimanual coordination. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  R. Ivry,et al.  Moving to Directly Cued Locations Abolishes Spatial Interference During Bimanual Actions , 2001, Psychological science.

[20]  R. Ivry,et al.  Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters , 2003, Psychological research.

[21]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[22]  D. Sherwood Distance and location assimilation effects in rapid bimanual movement. , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[23]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  7 – Doing Two Things at Once: Process Limitations and Interactions , 1984 .

[24]  Natalia Dounskaia,et al.  Constraints during bimanual coordination: the role of direction in relation to amplitude and force requirements , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  R De Jong,et al.  An intention-activation account of residual switch costs , 2000 .

[26]  A. Wing,et al.  The Psychology of human movement , 1984 .

[27]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[28]  A M Wing,et al.  Brief bimanual force pulses: correlations between the hands in force and time. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Static and Phasic Cross-Talk Effects in Discrete Bimanual Reversal Movements , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[30]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Directional interference during bimanual coordination: is interlimb coupling mediated by afferent or efferent processes , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  A. Georgopoulos Higher order motor control. , 1991, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  David E. Sherwood,et al.  Interlimb amplitude differences, spatial assimilations, and the temporal structure of rapid bimanual movements , 1994 .

[33]  J. Kelso,et al.  Elementary Coordination Dynamics , 1994 .

[34]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[35]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  S. P. Swinnen,et al.  Generation of Bimanual Trajectories of Disparate Eccentricity: Levels of Interference and Spontaneous Changes Over Practice , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[38]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  The specification of digit and duration during motor programming: a new method of precueing. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[39]  D E Sherwood,et al.  Hand preference, practice order, and spatial assimilations in rapid bimanual movement. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[40]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  C. B. Walter,et al.  The coordination of limb movements with different kinematic patterns , 1988, Brain and Cognition.

[43]  J A Kelso,et al.  A theoretical note on models of interlimb coordination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  The effect of movement speed on upper-limb coupling strength , 1992 .

[45]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination , 2001, Nature.

[46]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  Spatial Conceptual Influences on the Coordination of Bimanual Actions: When a Dual Task Becomes a Single Task , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[47]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  10 A Preliminary Theory of Two-Hand Cd-Ordinated Control , 1980 .

[48]  Natalia Dounskaia,et al.  Egocentric and Allocentric Constraints in the Expression of Patterns of Interlimb Coordination , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  D. Corcos,et al.  Two-Handed Movement Control , 1984 .

[50]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[51]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Bimanual coupling during the specification of isometric forces , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Marco Favilla,et al.  Parallel direction and extent specification of planar reaching arm movements in humans , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Structural Constraints on the Performance of Symmetrical Bimanual Movements with Different Amplitudes , 1995 .

[55]  E. Saltzman,et al.  Space-time behavior of single and bimanual rhythmical movements: data and limit cycle model. , 1987 .

[56]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 1987, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  Will Spijkers,et al.  The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[58]  Herbert Heuer Will Spijkers Thomas Kleinsorge Hanno van de Loo Period Duration of Physical and Im aginary Movement Sequences Affects Contralateral Amplitude Modulation , 1998 .

[59]  H. Durwen,et al.  Electromyographic investigation of mirror movements in normal adults: variation of frequency with site, effort and repetition of movements , 1992 .

[60]  D. Sherwood,et al.  EMG amplitude and spatial assimilation effects in rapid bimanual movement. , 1992, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[61]  W Spijkers,et al.  Specification of movement amplitudes for the left and right hands: evidence for transient parametric coupling from overlapping-task performance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[63]  D. Rosenbaum Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[64]  J J Denier van der Gon,et al.  Mechanisms underlying accuracy in fast goal-directed arm movements in man. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[65]  A Semjen,et al.  Distributed planning of movement sequences. , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[66]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Control of Movement in Three-Dimensional Space , 1996 .

[67]  B. Preilowski,et al.  Bilateral Motor Interaction: Perceptual-Motor Performance of Partial and Complete “Split-Brain” Patients , 1975 .

[68]  Daniel Bullock,et al.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation , 1988 .

[69]  J. F. Schouten,et al.  Reaction time and accuracy. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[70]  Natalia Dounskaia,et al.  Patterns of Bimanual Interference Reveal Movement Encoding within a Radial Egocentric Reference Frame , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  J. Kelso,et al.  A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[72]  C. Ghez,et al.  Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.