Challenging Obduracy: how Local Communities Transform the Energy System

Abstract The transformation from the current energy system to a decentralized renewable energy system requires the transformation of communities into energy neutral or even energy producing communities. Increasingly, citizens become ‘prosumers’ and pool their resources to start a local energy initiative. In this paper we present an in-depth study of networks that recently developed, which challenge the established way of centralized decision-making on energy resources. Many local communities are eager to promote sustainable energy production, to use local financial resources for the local community and to employ democratic governance of energy production and supply. Furthermore, we study how these co-operations are linked to local, regional and national networks for community energy. We use both Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and Social Movement Theory (SMT) to investigate the initiatives, as this allows a dynamic analysis of collective strategies. We discuss the obduracy of the energy system and how this system is challenged by new connections between communities and global networks and by new types of energy providers that are rooted in social networks. Furthermore, we draw attention to the way community energy networks provide a social innovation while realizing a decentralized and decarbonized energy system.

[1]  Michel Callon,et al.  The state and technical innovation: a case study of the electrical vehicle in France☆ , 1980 .

[2]  Sören Becker,et al.  Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organisation and ownership of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions , 2015 .

[3]  Y. Parag,et al.  More than filler: Middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the “middle-out” , 2014 .

[4]  Sandra Bellekom,et al.  Power to the people: local energy initiatives as seedbeds of innovation? , 2014, Energy, Sustainability and Society.

[5]  E. Sardianou,et al.  Which factors affect the willingness of consumers to adopt renewable energies , 2013 .

[6]  G. Thomas A Typology for the Case Study in Social Science Following a Review of Definition, Discourse, and Structure , 2011 .

[7]  Gill Seyfang,et al.  Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions , 2012 .

[8]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Blowing against the wind—An exploratory application of actor network theory to the analysis of local controversies and participation processes in wind energy , 2010 .

[9]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[10]  Alexander Peine,et al.  User-led innovation in civic energy communities , 2016 .

[11]  Adrian Smith,et al.  A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK , 2013 .

[12]  Nicola Montagna,et al.  Social Movements: A Reader , 2016 .

[13]  Lars Holstenkamp,et al.  Zum Stand von Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland , 2015 .

[14]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  Grassroots Localisation? The Scalar Potential of and Limits of the ‘Transition’ Approach to Climate Change and Resource Constraint , 2013 .

[15]  Linda Steg,et al.  Factors that influence consumers’ acceptance of future energy systems: the effects of adjustment type, production level, and price , 2014 .

[16]  W. Bijker,et al.  Constructing a City: The Cerdà Plan for the Extension of Barcelona , 1997 .

[17]  M. Wiering,et al.  The institutional space of community initiatives for renewable energy: a comparative case study of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark , 2014 .

[18]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Feelings of Discontent and the Promise of Middle Range Theory for STS , 2007 .

[19]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Energy sustainable communities : Environmental psychological investigations , 2008 .

[20]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Community renewable energy: What should it mean , 2008 .

[21]  O. Kuik,et al.  Local acceptance of renewable energy - A case study from southeast Germany , 2011 .

[22]  Tineke van der Schoor,et al.  Power to the people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy , 2015 .

[23]  Julian Sagebiel,et al.  Are consumers willing to pay more for electricity from cooperatives? Results from an online Choice Experiment in Germany , 2014 .

[24]  Paolo Cottone,et al.  One, no one, one hundred thousand energy transitions in Europe: The quest for a cultural approach , 2016 .

[25]  I. Lammers,et al.  Local Governments Supporting Local Energy Initiatives: Lessons from the Best Practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands) , 2015 .

[26]  Giorgio Osti,et al.  Does civil society matter? Challenges and strategies of grassroots initiatives in Italy’s energy transition , 2016 .

[27]  B. Huybrechts,et al.  Connecting the Dots for Social Value: A Review on Social Networks and Social Entrepreneurship , 2014 .

[28]  Bernie Hogan,et al.  Network approach for local and community governance of energy: The case of Oxfordshire , 2013 .

[29]  R. Kirkman At Home in the Seamless Web , 2009 .

[30]  P. North The Politics of Climate Activism in the UK: A Social Movement Analysis , 2011 .

[31]  Gregor Kungl,et al.  The Incumbent German Power Companies in a Changing Environment , 2014 .

[32]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use? , 2008 .

[33]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK , 2007, Global Environmental Politics.

[34]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  Desperately seeking niches: Grassroots innovations and niche development in the community currency field , 2013 .

[35]  K. Araújo The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities , 2014 .

[36]  Sabine Hielscher,et al.  A grassroots sustainable energy niche?:Reflections on community energy in the UK , 2014 .

[37]  Anique Hommels,et al.  Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Sociotechnical Change , 2005 .

[38]  Gregor Kungl,et al.  Stewards or sticklers for change? Incumbent energy providers and the politics of the German energy transition , 2015 .

[39]  Sabine Hielscher,et al.  Community innovation for sustainable energy , 2011 .

[40]  Steven M. Hoffman,et al.  From private lives to collective action: Recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program , 2010 .

[41]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development , 2013 .

[42]  T. Moss Intermediaries and the Governance of Sociotechnical Networks in Transition , 2009 .

[43]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Modulating societal acceptance in new energy projects: Towards a toolkit methodology for project managers , 2009 .

[44]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Lobbying the ‘Energiewende’. Assessing the effectiveness of strategies to promote the renewable energy business in Germany , 2014 .

[45]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[46]  Sabine Hielscher,et al.  Grassroots Innovations for Sustainable Energy: Exploring niche development processes among community energy initiatives , 2013 .

[47]  U. Jørgensen Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development , 2012 .

[48]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding , 2014 .

[49]  Thomas Bauwens,et al.  What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives , 2016 .

[50]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Up, Down, round and round: Connecting Regimes and Practices in Innovation for Sustainability , 2013 .

[51]  Alexander Peine,et al.  The sources of use knowledge: towards integrating the dynamics of technology use and design in the articulation of societal challenges , 2012 .

[52]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[53]  F. Geels Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[54]  Albena Yaneva,et al.  Give me a Gun and I will Make All Buildings Move: An ANT’s View of Architecture , 2008 .

[55]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Renewable Energy and Sociotechnical Change: Imagined Subjectivities of ‘the Public’ and Their Implications , 2010 .

[56]  A. Hommels,et al.  Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies , 2005 .

[57]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Undesired reinforcement of harmful ‘self-evident truths’ concerning the implementation of wind power , 2012 .