Variability of the Accommodation Response in Early Onset Myopia

Purpose. Hyperopic retinal defocus (blur) is thought to be a cause of myopia. If the retinal image of an object is not clearly focused, the resulting blur is thought to cause the continuing lengthening of the eyeball during development causing a permanent refractive error. Both lag of accommodation, especially for near targets, and greater variability in the accommodative response, have been suggested as causes of increased hyperopic retinal blur. Previous studies of lag of accommodation show variable findings. In comparison, greater variability in the accommodative response has been demonstrated in adults with late onset myopia but has not been tested in children. This study looked at the lag and variability of accommodation in children with early onset myopia. Methods. Twenty-one myopic and 18 emmetropic children were tested. Dynamic measures of accommodation and pupil size were made using eccentric photorefraction (PowerRefractor) while children viewed targets set at three different accommodative demands (0.25, 2, and 4 D). Results. We found no difference in accommodative lag between groups. However, the accommodative response was more variable in the myopes than emmetropes when viewing both the near (4 D) and far (0.25 D) targets. Since pupil size and variability also varied, we analyzed the data to determine whether this could account for the inter-group differences in accommodation variability. Variation in these factors was not found to be sufficient to explain these differences. Changes in the accommodative response variability with target distance were similar to patterns reported previously in adult emmetropes and late onset myopes. Conclusions. Children with early onset myopia demonstrate greater accommodative variability than emmetropic children, and have similar patterns of response to adult late onset myopes. This increased variability could result in an increase in retinal blur for both near and far targets. The role of accommodative variability in the etiology of myopia is discussed.

[1]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Sotiris Plainis,et al.  The effect of ocular aberrations on steady-state errors of accommodative response. , 2005, Journal of Vision.

[3]  Stephanie Jainta,et al.  Measurement of refractive error and accommodation with the photorefractor PowerRef II , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  C. Schor,et al.  The fluctuations of accommodation and ageing. , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[5]  M. Rosenfield,et al.  Do Progressing Myopes Show Reduced Accommodative Responses? , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  R. Held,et al.  Accommodation, Accommodative Convergence, and Response AC/A Ratios Before and at the Onset of Myopia in Children , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  S. E. Morse,et al.  Oculomotor functions and late‐onset myopia , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[8]  N. Strang,et al.  Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus , 2006, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  S Usui,et al.  Sensory and motor mechanisms interact to control amplitude of pupil noise , 1978, Vision Research.

[10]  M. Birnbaum.  Clinical management of myopia. , 1981, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[11]  D. Mutti,et al.  Accommodative lag before and after the onset of myopia. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  M Rosenfield,et al.  Blur sensitivity in myopes. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  Frank Schaeffel,et al.  An evaluation of the lag of accommodation using photorefraction , 2003, Vision Research.

[14]  P. Denieul,et al.  Effects of stimulus vergence on mean accommodation response, microfluctuations of accommodation and optical quality of the human eye , 1982, Vision Research.

[15]  Pamela J Blade,et al.  Validation of the PowerRefractor for Measuring Human Infant Refraction , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  H C Howland,et al.  Laboratory, Clinical, and Kindergarten Test of a New Eccentric Infrared Photorefractor (PowerRefractor) , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  Elise Harb,et al.  Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes , 2006, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Gwiazda,et al.  Role of genetic factors in the etiology of juvenile-onset myopia based on a longitudinal study of refractive error. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  K. Schmid,et al.  Sharp vision: a prerequisite for compensation to myopic defocus in the chick? , 1998, Current eye research.

[20]  A. E. Sloane,et al.  The Myopias: Basic Science and Clinical Management , 1986 .

[21]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  Homeostasis of Eye Growth and the Question of Myopia , 2012, Neuron.

[22]  L. Hainline,et al.  Development of accommodation and convergence in infancy , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  G. Hung,et al.  A unifying theory of refractive error development , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[24]  T Rowan Candy,et al.  The stability of steady state accommodation in human infants. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[25]  C. Miège,et al.  Mean response and oscillations of accommodation for various stimulus vergences in relation to accommodation feedback control , 1988, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[26]  W. N. Charman,et al.  Accommodation and the through-focus changes of the retinal image , 2000 .

[27]  J. Wolffsohn,et al.  Cognition, ocular accommodation, and cardiovascular function in emmetropes and late-onset myopes. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  A computational model of the error detector of human visual accommodation , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  L. Gray,et al.  Retinotopic accommodation responses in myopia. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  N C Strang,et al.  Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes , 1998, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[31]  Dirk Seidel,et al.  The Effect of Monocular and Binocular Viewing on the Accommodation Response to Real Targets in Emmetropia and Myopia , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  M. Alpern,et al.  Variability of accommodation during steady fixation at various levels of illuminance. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[33]  D. Atchison,et al.  Pupil size, mean accommodation response and the fluctuations of accommodation , 1997, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[34]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Peripheral refractive errors in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic young subjects. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[35]  R. Held,et al.  Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.