Learner control over full and lean computer-based instruction under differing ability levels

This study examined the effects of type of instructional control and program mode on the achievement, option use, time in the program, and attitudes of higher-ability and lower-ability university students. Ability level was determined using participants' Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and American College Testing Assessment (ACT) scores. Participants were randomly assigned to four versions of a computer-delivered instructional program within higher-ability and lower-ability groups. The four versions of the instructional program were created by crossing the two control conditions (learner control, program control) with the two program modes (full, lean). Participants in the full program scored significantly higher on the posttest than those in the lean program, and higher-ability students scored significantly higher than lower-ability students. Learner-control participants chose to view 68% of the optional screens in the full program but only 35% in the lean one, and participants also spent significantly more time in the full version. Participants had more favorable attitudes toward learner control than program control.

[1]  C. E. Pascal.  Instructional Options, Option Preference, and Course Outcomes. , 1971 .

[2]  M. Merrill.  Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions , 1975 .

[3]  Esther R. Steinberg,et al.  Review of Student Control in Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1977 .

[4]  R. Tennyson,et al.  Pretask and On-Task Adaptive Design Strategies for Selecting Number of Instances in Concept Acquisition. , 1977 .

[5]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Individual Characteristics and Children's Learning in Large-Group and Small-Group Approaches: Study II. Report from the Project on Studies of Instructional Programming for the Individual Student. , 1979 .

[6]  R. Tennyson.  Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction. , 1980 .

[7]  M. David Merrill.  Learner control in computer based learning , 1980 .

[8]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction , 1980 .

[9]  S. Ross,et al.  Learner control versus program control as adaptive strategies for selection of instructional support on math rules. , 1981 .

[10]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  Teaching for Competence , 1983 .

[11]  Jay Comras.  The SATtm—What Does It Measure and Does It Still Work? , 1984 .

[12]  Carol A. Carrier.  Selection of Options by Field Independent and Dependent Children in a Computer-Based Concept Lesson. , 1984 .

[13]  M. Hannafin,et al.  The Effect of the Locus of CAI Control Strategies on the Learning of Mathematics Rules , 1985 .

[14]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  The selection of instructional options in a computer-based coordinate concept lesson , 1985 .

[15]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  Instructional Options and Encouragement Effects in a Microcomputer-Delivered Concept Lesson , 1986 .

[16]  Susan H. Gray,et al.  The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning , 1987 .

[17]  Nira Hativa,et al.  Differential Characteristics and Methods of Operation Underlying CAI/CMI Drill and Practice Systems , 1988 .

[18]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  A Test of One Learner-Control Strategy With Students of Differing Levels of Task Persistence , 1988 .

[19]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Learner Control and Achievement in Science Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1988 .

[20]  Cecilia L. Lopez,et al.  The relationship between learner control of CAI and locus of control among hispanic students , 1989 .

[21]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Continuing motivation, learner control, and CAI , 1989 .

[22]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Uses and effects of learner control of context and instructional support in computer-based instruction , 1989 .

[23]  H. Sullivan,et al.  Practice Mode and Learner Control in Computer-Based Instruction , 1990 .

[24]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics , 1992 .

[25]  Samuel Hicken,et al.  Learner control modes and incentive variations in computer-delivered instruction , 1992 .

[26]  H. Sullivan,et al.  Matching learner preference to amount of instruction: An alternative form of learner control , 1995 .

[27]  Robert D. Hannafin,et al.  Learner control in full and lean CAI programs , 1995 .

[28]  H. Sullivan,et al.  Preferences and learner control over amount of instruction. , 1996 .

[29]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  Learner preferences and achievement under differing amounts of learner practice , 1998 .