Limited application of irrigation water does not affect the nutritive characteristics of lucerne

Lucerne (Medicago sativa) has not been a significant part of the feedbase of the Murray-Dairy Region of Australia. However, under future climate regimes, which are indicating an overall decline in rainfall as well as water available for irrigation of pastures, lucerne is emerging as a potential forage species because of its adaptability, productivity and resilience. A large-scale field experiment was conducted at Tatura, Victoria, Australia, over four years to determine the dry matter (DM) production and nutritive characteristics of lucerne under a range of limiting and non-limiting irrigation management practices. Nine irrigation treatments were imposed that ranged from full irrigation to no irrigation in either a single, or over consecutive, irrigation seasons. Plots were harvested using plant-based criteria over the irrigation season and DM production and nutritive characteristics were determined. DM production generally increased as the total water supply (irrigation plus rainfall plus changes in soil water) increased, with the fully irrigated treatments producing significantly more DM than the treatments where the irrigation water had been restricted. Mean annual DM digestibility concentration was 66% of DM and was not affected by treatment. Similarly, mean crude protein concentration, which was 22% of DM, was also not affected by treatment. There was no consistent effect of restricted irrigation on the neutral detergent fibre concentration of the lucerne plants. These results suggest that in seasons where irrigation is restricted because of limited water supply, the reduction in lucerne productivity is not associated with a penalty in forage nutritive characteristics, with lucerne able to provide sufficient nutrients to form a large proportion of the total diet for a high-producing dairy cow.

[1]  Jorge Alberto Elizondo-Salazar,et al.  Estimación lineal de los requerimientos nutricionales del NRC para ganado de leche. , 2014 .

[2]  J. Bouton.  Breeding lucerne for persistence , 2012, Crop and Pasture Science.

[3]  R. Rawnsley,et al.  Yield and water-use efficiency of contrasting lucerne genotypes grown in a cool temperate environment , 2011 .

[4]  S. Cosentino,et al.  Dry matter and qualitative characteristics of alfalfa as affected by harvest times and soil water content , 2011 .

[5]  W. Fulkerson,et al.  Differences in water-use efficiency among perennial forages used by the dairy industry under optimum and deficit irrigation , 2010, Irrigation Science.

[6]  W. Fulkerson,et al.  Difference in yield and persistence among perennial forages used by the dairy industry under optimum and deficit irrigation. , 2009 .

[7]  M. Casler,et al.  Canopy Structure and Neutral Detergent Fiber Differences among Temperate Perennial Grasses , 2007 .

[8]  C. Clark,et al.  NUTRITIVE VALUE OF FORAGE SPECIES GROWN IN THE WARM TEMPERATE CLIMATE OF AUSTRALIA FOR DAIRY COWS: GRASSES AND LEGUMES , 2007 .

[9]  H. Dove,et al.  Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants. , 2007 .

[10]  K. Greenwood,et al.  Improved soil and irrigation management for forage production 2. Forage yield and nutritive characteristics , 2006 .

[11]  K. M. Pollock,et al.  Herbage production, persistence, nutritive characteristics and water use of perennial forages grown over 6 years on a Wakanui silt loam , 2005 .

[12]  K. Kelly,et al.  The productivity of irrigated legumes in northern Victoria. 1. Effect of irrigation interval , 2005 .

[13]  M. Rogers.  The effect of saline irrigation on lucerne production: shoot and root growth, ion relations and flowering incidence in six cultivars grown in northern Victoria, Australia , 2001, Irrigation Science.

[14]  C. Sheaffer,et al.  Leaf and stem properties of alfalfa entries , 2000 .

[15]  N. Berardo,et al.  Effect of phenological stages on dry matter and quality components in lucerne , 1997 .

[16]  E. Small.  Adaptations to herbivory in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) , 1996 .

[17]  P. V. Soest,et al.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  John S. Shenk,et al.  Population Definition, Sample Selection, and Calibration Procedures for Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy , 1991 .

[19]  T. Trigg,et al.  Effects of pasture and supplement quality on the responses of lactating dairy cows to high energy supplements , 1990 .

[20]  D. R. Buxton,et al.  Water‐Stress Effects on Alfalfa Forage Quality After Adjustment for Maturity Differences , 1989 .

[21]  W. F. Wedin,et al.  Cell-wall composition and digestibility of alfalfa stems and leaves , 1987 .

[22]  Wk Mason,et al.  Effect of growth stage at cutting on yield and quality of lucerne cultivars from different dormancy groups in northern Victoria , 1987 .

[23]  M. Demment,et al.  Changes in Forage Quality of Improved Alfalfa Populations 1 , 1986 .

[24]  C. Sheaffer,et al.  Alfalfa Response to Soil Water Deficits. I. Growth, Forage Quality, Yield, Water Use, and Water-Use Efficiency 1 , 1983 .

[25]  P. Flinn,et al.  Low-cost pepsin-cellulase assays for prediction of digestibility of herbage , 1982 .

[26]  M. Sánchez-Díaz,et al.  Nitrogen fixation, stomatal response and transpiration in Medicago sativa, Trifolium repens and T. subterraneum under water stress and recovery , 1980 .

[27]  R. Snaydon,et al.  The effect of total water supply, and frequency of application, upon lucerne. II.* Chemical composition , 1972 .

[28]  L. R. Vough,et al.  Influence of Soil Moisture and Ambient Temperature on Yield and Quality of Alfalfa Forage1 , 1971 .

[29]  R. Brewer,et al.  A Handbook of Australian Soils , 1968 .

[30]  R. A. Terry,et al.  THE DIGESTIBILITY OF THE LEAVES AND STEMS OF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS, COCKSFOOT, TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, LUCERNE AND SAINFOIN, AS MEASURED BY AN IN VITRO PROCEDURE , 1964 .