Reconciling the value of the elevator round trip time between calculation and simulation

This paper attempts to understand the reasons for the difference in the value of the round trip time between calculation and simulation. It is posited the main reason for the difference is the combination of two factors: the restricted car capacity and the randomness in the behavior of the elevator traffic system, thus leading to a reduced effective car loading (effectively based on a smaller number of passengers in the car). There are three sources of randomness in the behavior of the system: the randomness of the passenger destinations (thus making the value of the round trip time a random variable), the randomness of the passenger arrival (driven by a Poisson passenger arrival model), and the effect of elevator bunching (thus making the value of the interval a random variable). Using a MATLAB-based simulator, the value of the round trip time is plotted against the system loading level for the case of a single entrance and incoming traffic only. Different conditions are simulated, including constant and random passenger arrivals, as well as queues-allowed and queues-not-allowed conditions. Varying these conditions provides an essential insight into the variation of the round trip time and the reasons for it. The effect of the number of passengers boarding the elevator on the value of the round trip time (and thus on the value of the system handling capacity) is investigated in more detail.

[1]  Lutfi Al-Sharif,et al.  Elevator Traffic Handbook: Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[2]  C. J. Harris,et al.  Multi-car lift system analysis and design , 1979 .

[3]  Lutfi Al-Sharif,et al.  The HARint Space: A methodology for compliant elevator traffic designs , 2015 .

[4]  Marja-Liisa Siikonen,et al.  Elevator traffic simulation procedure , 2009 .

[5]  Lutfi Al-Sharif,et al.  The effect of the building population and the number of floors on the vertical transportation design of low and medium rise buildings , 2010 .

[6]  C. J. Harris,et al.  Evaluation of the handling capacity of multi-car lift systems , 1981 .

[7]  Lutfi Al-Sharif,et al.  The current practice of lift traffic design using calculation and simulation , 2014 .

[8]  C. J. Harris,et al.  Derivation of the mean highest reversal floor and expected number of stops in lift systems , 1979 .

[10]  Ahmad Hammoudeh,et al.  Evaluating the elevator round trip time for multiple entrances and incoming traffic conditions using Markov chain Monte Carlo , 2014 .

[11]  Marja-Liisa Siikonen,et al.  PASSENGER TRAFFIC FLOW SIMULATION IN TALL BUILDINGS , 2007 .

[12]  Sasi Bharath Desai.  Discrete Event Simulation of Elevator Systems , 2012 .

[13]  Lutfi Al-Sharif,et al.  Automated optimal design methodology of elevator systems using rules and graphical methods (the HARint plane) , 2013 .

[14]  R. D. Peters.  Lift traffic analysis: Formulae for the general case , 1990 .

[15]  Marja-Liisa Siikonen,et al.  Elevator Traffic Simulation , 1993, Simul..

[16]  Donald P. Gaver,et al.  Variability in Round-Trip Times for an Elevator Car During Up-Peak , 1971 .

[17]  Lutfi Al-Sharif.  The effect of multiple entrances on the elevator round trip time under up-peak traffic , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[18]  Lutfi Al-Sharif,et al.  Derivation of a universal elevator round trip time formula under incoming traffic , 2014 .

[19]  Lutfi Al-Sharif,et al.  Stepwise derivation and verification of a universal elevator round trip time formula for general traffic conditions , 2015 .

[20]  Mohamed Hussein,et al.  Establishing the upper performance limit of destination elevator group control using idealised optimal benchmarks , 2015 .

[21]  Lutfi Al-Sharif,et al.  The use of Monte Carlo simulation in evaluating the elevator round trip time under up-peak traffic conditions and conventional group control , 2012 .