Three-dimensional structure-activity relationship modeling of cross-reactivities of a polyclonal antibody against pyrene by comparative molecular field analysis

Immunoassays have been regarded as a possible alternative or supplement for measuring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the environment. Since there are too many potential cross-reactants for PAH immunoassays, it is difficult to determine all the cross-reactivities (CRs) by experimental tests. In this study, the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) technique, comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), was applied to predict the CRs of a polyclonal antibody against pyrene. The CoMFA model developed shows that the CRs of the compounds are correlated to their 3D structure (n = 14, q 2 =0.527, r 2 =0.944, and Standard Error (SE) = 0.22478). The contributions of the steric and electrostatic fields to CRs are 95 and 5%, respectively. The results of the correlation predicted the CRs with actual CRs of randomly selected test compounds and showed that the developed model has good prediction ability. The QSAR model has been applied to predict the CRs of other 17 PAHs. The 3D-QSAR model and its respective contour plot could be useful tools to further understand the molecular nature of antibody-antigen interactions.

[1]  Zhi-Xian Gao,et al.  Predicting the cross-reactivities of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ELISA by regression analysis and CoMFA methods , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[2]  Candace R. Spier,et al.  The development and evaluation of monoclonal antibodies for the detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. , 2009, Analytical biochemistry.

[3]  Stephen A. Wise,et al.  Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in environmental samples: a critical review of gas chromatographic (GC) methods , 2006, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[4]  G. Portella,et al.  Local aromaticity of [n]acenes, [n]phenacenes, and [n]helicenes (n = 1-9). , 2005, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[5]  R. Law,et al.  Developments in the use of chromatographic techniques in marine laboratories for the determination of halogenated contaminants and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[6]  M. Hennion,et al.  Experimental comparison of three monoclonal antibodies for the class-selective immunoextraction of triazines. Correlation with molecular modeling and principal component analysis studies. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  Xavier Fradera,et al.  The delocalization index as an electronic aromaticity criterion: application to a series of planar polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. , 2003, Chemistry.

[8]  Miloslav Pravda,et al.  IMMUNOCHEMICAL DETECTION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHs) , 2002 .

[9]  L. Conte,et al.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in edible fats and oils: occurrence and analytical methods. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[10]  R. Niessner,et al.  A modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for polyaromatic hydrocarbons , 1999 .

[11]  S. R. Gadre,et al.  Clar's Aromatic Sextet Theory Revisited via Molecular Electrostatic Potential Topography , 1999 .

[12]  V. Roberts,et al.  Monoclonal antibody-based ELISAs for part-per-billion determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: effects of haptens and formats on sensitivity and specificity. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Damià Barceló,et al.  Determination of PAHs in river water samples by ELISA , 1998 .

[14]  Petra M. Krämer,et al.  A strategy to validate immunoassay test kits for TNT and PAHs as a field screening method for contaminated sites in Germany , 1998 .

[15]  Siân T. Howard,et al.  Benzenoid Hydrocarbon Aromaticity in Terms of Charge Density Descriptors , 1997 .

[16]  Kenneth B. Wiberg,et al.  PROPERTIES OF SOME CONDENSED AROMATIC SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[17]  Dai Shu-gui An Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons , 2006 .

[18]  P. Schleyer,et al.  Introduction: aromaticity. , 2001, Chemical reviews.