Meeting Opportunities and Partner Selection : A Field Study ∗

Much empirical evidence shows that female and male partners look alike along a variety of attributes. It is however unclear how this positive sorting comes about, because marriage is an equilibrium outcome arising from a process that entails searching, meeting and choosing one another, a process that is usually a black box to social researchers. This study exploits unique field data from a large speed dating agency to shed light on the forces driving choices at the earliest stage of a relationship – after a first meeting. We find that both women and men value physical attributes, such as age and weight, and that choices are assortative along age, height, and education. However, we find that meeting opportunities play a dominant role in determining dating proposals. These results have important implications for our understanding of the degree of social openness and mobility. JEL Classification Numbers: D1, J1

[1]  P. Todd,et al.  The relationship between number of potential mates and mating skew in humans , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Günter J. Hitsch,et al.  Matching and Sorting in Online Dating , 2008 .

[3]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Revisited : Do People Know What They Initially Desire in a Romantic Partner ? , 2008 .

[4]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Nicolas L. Jacquet,et al.  On the Segmentation of Markets , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  A. Little,et al.  Social transmission of face preferences among humans , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: A methodological primer. , 2007 .

[8]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence From a Speed Dating Experiment , 2006 .

[9]  A. Siow,et al.  Who Marries Whom and Why , 2006, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  B. Moldovanu,et al.  The Theory of Assortative Matching Based on Costly Signals , 2005 .

[11]  David Marmaros,et al.  How Do Friendships Form? , 2005 .

[12]  R. Kurzban,et al.  HurryDate: Mate preferences in action , 2005 .

[13]  Robert D. Mare,et al.  Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003 , 2005, Demography.

[14]  G. Harrison,et al.  Field experiments , 1924, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[15]  David S. Lyle,et al.  Women, War, and Wages: The Effect of Female Labor Supply on the Wage Structure at Midcentury , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Alberto Bisin,et al.  Religious Intermarriage and Socialization in the United States , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  S. Emlen,et al.  Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  E. Paice,et al.  Spoiled for choice , 2003, Medical education.

[19]  M. L. Cooper,et al.  Seventy years of research on personality and close relationships: substantive and methodological trends over time. , 2002, Journal of personality.

[20]  S. Kozieł,et al.  The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates , 2002 .

[21]  Bernard Fortin,et al.  Marriage Market, Divorce Legislation, and Household Labor Supply , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  Linda Y. Wong,et al.  Structural Estimation of Marriage Models , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[23]  J. Angrist How Do Sex Ratios Affect Marriage and Labor Markets? Evidence from America's Second Generation , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[24]  H. Flap,et al.  Assortative Meeting and Mating: Unintended Consequences of Organized Settings for Partner Choices , 2001 .

[25]  S. Hoffman A Treatise on the Family , 2000 .

[26]  K. Grammer,et al.  The Body and Face of Woman: One Ornament that Signals Quality? , 1999 .

[27]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  J. Emery,et al.  Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness , 1998, The Lancet.

[29]  P. Todd,et al.  Mate choice turns cognitive , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Lones Smith The Marriage Model with Search Frictions , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Melvyn G. Coles,et al.  Marriage and Class , 1997 .

[32]  R. K. Young,et al.  Social pressures for assortative mating , 1997 .

[33]  Matthijs Kalmijn,et al.  Assortative Mating by Cultural and Economic Occupational Status , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  M. Bagnoli,et al.  Courtship as a Waiting Game , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[35]  R. Mare Five decades of educational assortative mating. , 1991 .

[36]  Robert S. Gregg Book Review: From Many Strands: Ethnic and Racial Groups in Contemporary America , 1989 .

[37]  John W. Mohr,et al.  Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  M. Hout The Association between Husbands' and Wives' Occupations in Two-Earner Families , 1982, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  L. A. Goodman Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories , 1979 .

[40]  L. Stone The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500-1800. , 1977 .

[41]  R. Plomin,et al.  Assortative mating by unwed biological parents of adopted children. , 1977, Science.

[42]  G. Becker A Theory of Marriage: Part II , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[43]  G. Becker Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .

[44]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[45]  G. William Walster,et al.  Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis☆ , 1971 .

[46]  W. R. Smith The History of Human Marriage , 1891, Nature.

[47]  Soohyung Lee Marriage and Online Mate-Search Services: Evidence From South Korea , 2009 .

[48]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Racial Preferences in Dating , 2008 .

[49]  D. Bills The shape of social inequality : stratification and ethnicity in comparative perspective , 2005 .

[50]  小舟 Speed Dating/闪电约会 , 2004 .

[51]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  Who marries whom? : educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies , 2003 .

[52]  Lones Smith,et al.  Assortative Matching and Search , 2000 .

[53]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. , 1998, Annual review of sociology.

[54]  John H. Pencavel Assortative Mating by Schooling and the Work Behavior of Wives and Husbands , 1998 .

[55]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Conditional Mate Choice Strategies in Humans: Evidence from ‘Lonely Hearts’ Advertisements , 1995 .

[56]  D. Buss The Evolution Of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating , 1994 .

[57]  N. Ambady,et al.  Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[58]  Y. Weiss,et al.  The Formation and Dissolution of Families: Why Marry , 1992 .

[59]  D. Lam Marriage Markets and Assortative Mating with Household Public Goods: Theoretical Results and Empirical Implications , 1988 .

[60]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[61]  C. Hamilton Marriage as a trade , 2022 .