Computational design of protein antigens that interact with the CDR H3 loop of HIV broadly neutralizing antibody 2F5

Rational design of proteins with novel binding specificities and increased affinity is one of the major goals of computational protein design. Epitope‐scaffolds are a new class of antigens engineered by transplanting viral epitopes of predefined structure to protein scaffolds, or by building protein scaffolds around such epitopes. Epitope‐scaffolds are of interest as vaccine components to attempt to elicit neutralizing antibodies targeting the specified epitope. In this study we developed a new computational protocol, MultiGraft Interface, that transplants epitopes but also designs additional scaffold features outside the epitope to enhance antibody‐binding specificity and potentially influence the specificity of elicited antibodies. We employed MultiGraft Interface to engineer novel epitope‐scaffolds that display the known epitope of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV‐1) neutralizing antibody 2F5 and that also interact with the functionally important CDR H3 antibody loop. MultiGraft Interface generated an epitope‐scaffold that bound 2F5 with subnanomolar affinity (KD = 400 pM) and that interacted with the antibody CDR H3 loop through computationally designed contacts. Substantial structural modifications were necessary to engineer this antigen, with the 2F5 epitope replacing a helix in the native scaffold and with 15% of the native scaffold sequence being modified in the design stage. This epitope‐scaffold represents a successful example of rational protein backbone engineering and protein–protein interface design and could prove useful in the field of HIV vaccine design. MultiGraft Interface can be generally applied to engineer novel binding partners with altered specificity and optimized affinity. Proteins 2014; 82:2770–2782. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  W. Schief,et al.  Design and characterization of epitope-scaffold immunogens that present the motavizumab epitope from respiratory syncytial virus. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  K. Henrick,et al.  Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Computational Design of Proteins Targeting the Conserved Stem Region of Influenza Hemagglutinin , 2011, Science.

[4]  J. Mascola,et al.  Relationship between Antibody 2F5 Neutralization of HIV-1 and Hydrophobicity of Its Heavy Chain Third Complementarity-Determining Region , 2009, Journal of Virology.

[5]  Thomas Szyperski,et al.  Computational design of a PAK1 binding protein. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A comparison of successful and failed protein interface designs highlights the challenges of designing buried hydrogen bonds , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  Steven M. Lewis,et al.  Anchored Design of Protein-Protein Interfaces , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  J. Recio-Rodríguez,et al.  Comparison of two measuring instruments, B-pro and SphygmoCor system as reference, to evaluate central systolic blood pressure and radial augmentation index , 2012, Hypertension Research.

[9]  William R Schief,et al.  Advances in structure-based vaccine design. , 2013, Current opinion in virology.

[10]  E. Pai,et al.  Structural details of HIV-1 recognition by the broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody 2F5: epitope conformation, antigen-recognition loop mobility, and anion-binding site. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  K Dane Wittrup,et al.  Isolating and engineering human antibodies using yeast surface display , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[12]  J. Mascola,et al.  HIV-1 Neutralizing Antibodies Display Dual Recognition of the Primary and Coreceptor Binding Sites and Preferential Binding to Fully Cleaved Envelope Glycoproteins , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[13]  Yoshikazu Nakamura,et al.  Structure of ribosomal protein L1 from Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus. Functionally important structural invariants on the L1 surface. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[14]  E. Reinherz,et al.  Antibody mechanics on a membrane-bound HIV segment essential for GP41-targeted viral neutralization , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[15]  D. Baker,et al.  Heterologous Epitope-Scaffold Prime∶Boosting Immuno-Focuses B Cell Responses to the HIV-1 gp41 2F5 Neutralization Determinant , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[17]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  R. Wyatt,et al.  Structure-guided Alterations of the gp41-directed HIV-1 Broadly Neutralizing Antibody 2F5 Reveal New Properties Regarding its Neutralizing Function , 2012, PLoS pathogens.

[19]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational Design of High-Affinity Epitope Scaffolds by Backbone Grafting of a Linear Epitope , 2011, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[20]  F. Dyda,et al.  Unexpected structural diversity in DNA recombination: the restriction endonuclease connection. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[21]  David Baker,et al.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[22]  David Baker,et al.  Proof of principle for epitope-focused vaccine design , 2014, Nature.

[23]  R. Baric,et al.  Increased Antibody Affinity Confers Broad In Vitro Protection against Escape Mutants of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[24]  Baoshan Zhang,et al.  Broad and potent neutralization of HIV-1 by a gp41-specific human antibody , 2012, Nature.

[25]  D. Baker,et al.  Elicitation of structure-specific antibodies by epitope scaffolds , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  Computational design of affinity and specificity at protein-protein interfaces. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[27]  S. Koide,et al.  Structural insights for engineering binding proteins based on non-antibody scaffolds. , 2012, Current opinion in structural biology.

[28]  A. Kapila,et al.  Picomolar affinity fibronectin domains engineered utilizing loop length diversity, recursive mutagenesis, and loop shuffling. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  H. Liao,et al.  Role of HIV membrane in neutralization by two broadly neutralizing antibodies , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Peter D. Kwong,et al.  Structure and Mechanistic Analysis of the Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Antibody 2F5 in Complex with Its gp41 Epitope , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[31]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Backbone flexibility in computational protein design. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[32]  D. Baker,et al.  Computation-Guided Backbone Grafting of a Discontinuous Motif onto a Protein Scaffold , 2011, Science.

[33]  E. Pai,et al.  Ablation of the Complementarity-Determining Region H3 Apex of the Anti-HIV-1 Broadly Neutralizing Antibody 2F5 Abrogates Neutralizing Capacity without Affecting Core Epitope Binding , 2010, Journal of Virology.

[34]  L. Stamatatos,et al.  Computational design of epitope-scaffolds allows induction of antibodies specific for a poorly immunogenic HIV vaccine epitope. , 2010, Structure.

[35]  R. Dixon,et al.  Crystal structure of isoflavone reductase from alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  T. Kepler,et al.  Identification of autoantigens recognized by the 2F5 and 4E10 broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibodies , 2013, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[37]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  P. Rizkallah,et al.  Crystal structure of hyaluronidase, a major allergen of bee venom. , 2000, Structure.