Spatial interactions in upright and inverted faces: Re-exploration of spatial scale influence

Face features are hardly processed in isolation; they rather strongly interact over space. Spatial interactions are strong at upright, but not inverted orientation. Recent evidence indicated spatial interactions root in the low spatial frequencies (LSF) of face stimulus. Here, a balanced congruency paradigm was employed with upright and inverted filtered faces to circumvent the limits of previous investigations. Results confirm the LSF predominant contribution to spatial interactions and exclude lesser local information availability or methodological confounds as alternative accounts. Results further show that spatial interactions are driven by LSF, independently of the spectral properties of the attended face region.

[1]  H. Leder.  Line Drawings of Faces Reduce Configural Processing , 1996, Perception.

[2]  Nikolaus F Troje,et al.  Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification , 2008, Vision Research.

[4]  I Biederman,et al.  Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  S. Dakin,et al.  Natural image statistics mediate brightness ‘filling in’ , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  G. Hole.  Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[7]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[8]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.

[9]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[10]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  B. Rossion.  Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[13]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[14]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[17]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Newborns’ face recognition is based on spatial frequencies below 0.5 cycles per degree , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? , 2007, Cognition.

[20]  Paul T. Sowden,et al.  Channel surfing in the visual brain , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Using spatial frequency scales for processing face features and face configuration: An ERP analysis , 2008, Brain Research.

[22]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[23]  G. Hole,et al.  Evidence for Holistic Processing of Faces Viewed as Photographic Negatives , 1999, Perception.

[24]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Face-specific configural processing of relational information. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[25]  J. Keenan,et al.  Perception of global facial geometry in the inversion effect and prosopagnosia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  P. Dayan,et al.  Space and time in visual context , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Maurer,et al.  Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation , 2004, Psychological science.

[28]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[29]  Jedediah M. Singer,et al.  Holistic processing unites face parts across time , 2006, Vision Research.

[30]  B Julesz,et al.  Masking in Visual Recognition: Effects of Two-Dimensional Filtered Noise , 1973, Science.

[31]  J. Faubert,et al.  Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  R. Goebel,et al.  Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex. , 2009, Journal of neuropsychology.

[33]  H. Halit,et al.  Is high-spatial frequency information used in the early stages of face detection? , 2006, Brain Research.

[34]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[35]  Dennis C. Hay,et al.  Configural information in face recognition , 1987 .

[36]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[37]  J Sergent,et al.  Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[40]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[41]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  David C. Burr,et al.  Added noise restores recognizability of coarse quantized images , 1983, Nature.

[44]  Valerie Goffaux,et al.  The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[45]  Michael J Wenger,et al.  A decisional component of holistic encoding. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.