Accounting for dispersal and biotic interactions to disentangle the drivers of species distributions and their abundances.

Although abiotic factors, together with dispersal and biotic interactions, are often suggested to explain the distribution of species and their abundances, species distribution models usually focus on abiotic factors only. We propose an integrative framework linking ecological theory, empirical data and statistical models to understand the distribution of species and their abundances together with the underlying community assembly dynamics. We illustrate our approach with 21 plant species in the French Alps. We show that a spatially nested modelling framework significantly improves the model's performance and that the spatial variations of species presence-absence and abundances are predominantly explained by different factors. We also show that incorporating abiotic, dispersal and biotic factors into the same model bring new insights to our understanding of community assembly. This approach, at the crossroads between community ecology and biogeography, is a promising avenue for a better understanding of species co-existence and biodiversity distribution.

[1]  M. Araújo,et al.  The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change , 2007 .

[2]  P. Bénichou,et al.  Prix Norbert Gerbier 1986: prise en compte de la topographie pour la cartographie des champs pluviométriques statistiques , 1987 .

[3]  H. Pulliam.  On the relationship between niche and distribution , 2000 .

[4]  M. Fortin,et al.  Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data , 2012 .

[5]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[6]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  Plant coexistence and the niche , 2004 .

[7]  Jorge Soberón.  Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[8]  J. Peters,et al.  Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling , 2007 .

[9]  Martin Zobel,et al.  Dark diversity: shedding light on absent species. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  G. Tutz,et al.  An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[11]  L. Stone,et al.  The checkerboard score and species distributions , 1990, Oecologia.

[12]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Partitioning the factors of spatial variation in regeneration density of shade-tolerant tree species. , 2008, Ecology.

[13]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: where to go from here? , 2010 .

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  T. Schoener.  The Anolis Lizards of Bimini: Resource Partitioning in a Complex Fauna , 1968 .

[16]  M. Araújo,et al.  Biotic and abiotic variables show little redundancy in explaining tree species distributions , 2010 .

[17]  Ole R. Vetaas,et al.  Realized and potential climate niches: a comparison of four Rhododendron tree species , 2002 .

[18]  Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al.  SPECIES CO‐OCCURRENCE: A META‐ANALYSIS OF J. M. DIAMOND'S ASSEMBLY RULES MODEL , 2002 .

[19]  S. Gaines,et al.  Moving beyond assumptions to understand abundance distributions across the ranges of species. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  C. Lortie,et al.  Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress , 2002, Nature.

[21]  Robin Engler,et al.  Seed dispersal distances: a typology based on dispersal modes and plant traits , 2007, Botanica Helvetica.

[22]  A. Gimona,et al.  Opening the climate envelope reveals no macroscale associations with climate in European birds , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Karl Cottenie,et al.  Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[24]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Reopening the climate envelope reveals macroscale associations with climate in European birds , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  C. Lortie,et al.  Rethinking plant community theory , 2004 .

[26]  R. Maggini,et al.  A stratified approach for modeling the distribution of a threatened ant species in the Swiss National Park , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[27]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[28]  Michael E. Gilpin,et al.  Factors contributing to non-randomness in species Co-occurrences on Islands , 2004, Oecologia.

[29]  J. B. Blanquet.  Uber den Deckungswert der Arten in den Pflanzengesellschaften der Ordnung Vaccinio-Piceetalia , 1946 .

[30]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  Equitable Skill Scores for Categorical Forecasts , 1992 .

[31]  O. Linton.  Local Regression Models , 2010 .

[32]  C. Körner,et al.  Topographically controlled thermal‐habitat differentiation buffers alpine plant diversity against climate warming , 2011 .

[33]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  The practical value of modelling relative abundance of species for regional conservation planning: a case study , 2001 .

[34]  Brian J. McGill,et al.  Can niche-based distribution models outperform spatial interpolation? , 2007 .

[35]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  Predicting future distributions of mountain plants under climate change: does dispersal capacity matter? , 2009 .

[36]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Modelling the abundance of rare species: statistical models for counts with extra zeros , 1996 .

[37]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Trade‐offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence , 2004 .

[38]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Do we need land‐cover data to model species distributions in Europe? , 2004 .

[39]  M. Kearney,et al.  Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[40]  M. Chase,et al.  Environmental causes for plant biodiversity gradients. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[41]  B. Graae,et al.  Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species–environment relationships via agricultural land use , 2007 .

[42]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[43]  M. Bossard,et al.  CORINE land cover technical guide - Addendum 2000 , 2000 .

[44]  P. Choler,et al.  FACILITATION AND COMPETITION ON GRADIENTS IN ALPINE PLANT COMMUNITIES , 2001 .

[45]  P. Vittoz,et al.  Land use improves spatial predictions of mountain plant abundance but not presence-absence , 2009 .

[46]  J. Leathwick,et al.  Intra-generic competition among Nothofagus in New Zealand's primary indigenous forests , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[47]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Niche breadth, rarity and ecological characteristics within a regional flora spanning large environmental gradients , 2012 .

[48]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation , 1992 .

[49]  Jeremy VanDerWal,et al.  Abundance and the Environmental Niche: Environmental Suitability Estimated from Niche Models Predicts the Upper Limit of Local Abundance , 2009, The American Naturalist.