CLUSTERING METHOD OF DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRIX FOR TRADE-OFF RELATIONSHIPS

Due to the specialization and professionalization of design activities, sharing the product information between the members of a product development team has become important. In the previous study, we proposed M-QFD by applying the concept of Multi-space design model to QFD (quality function deployment) and the modularization method, which arranges the relationships between the diverse design elements extracted using M-QFD and modularizes (clusters) the product components. However, the clustering method has difficulty in deriving the adequate number of the clusters because the more types of the interactions become, the more the number of the trade-off relationships between the components included in a cluster. This paper presents the clustering method dealing the trade-off relationships between the product components. This method can support designers to integrate or decompose the components on the basis of the trade-off relationships. Moreover, this paper describes the illustrative example of the proposed method.

[1]  Christoph Meier,et al.  Systematic module and interface definition using component design structure matrix , 2010 .

[2]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  An information theoretic method for developing modular architectures using genetic algorithms , 2007 .

[3]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Characterizing complex product architectures , 2004, Syst. Eng..

[4]  Timothy K. Brady Utilization of Dependency Structure Matrix Analysis to Assess Complex Project Designs , 2002 .

[5]  David M. Sharman,et al.  Valuing architecture for strategic purposes : comments on applying the dependency structure matrix with real options theory , 2002 .

[6]  Yoshiyuki Matsuoka,et al.  QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT BASED ON THE MULTISPACE DESIGN MODEL , 2013 .

[7]  Takeo Kato,et al.  MULTISPACE QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT FOR MODULARIZATION , 2014 .

[8]  目代 武史 A Review on the Design Structure Matrix as an Analytical Tool for Product Development Management , 2006 .

[9]  Gregory Huet,et al.  Product decomposition using design structure matrix for intellectual property protection in supply chain outsourcing , 2012, Comput. Ind..

[10]  Timothy Kevin Brady,et al.  Utilization of dependency structure matrix analysis to assess implementation of NASA's complex technical projects , 2002 .

[11]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Architectural Valuation using the Design Structure Matrix and Real Options Theory , 2007, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[12]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[13]  Yoshiyuki Matsuoka,et al.  MULTI SPACE QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT USING INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELING , 2014 .

[14]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Module and interface identification and definition – a comprehensive approach using DSM , 2007 .

[15]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  A Genetic Algorithm for Developing Modular Product Architectures , 2003 .