Contribution of actin filaments and microtubules to quasi-in situ tensile properties and internal force balance of cultured smooth muscle cells on a substrate.

The effects of actin filaments (AFs) and microtubules (MTs) on quasi-in situ tensile properties and intracellular force balance were studied in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells (SMCs). A SMC cultured on substrates was held using a pair of micropipettes, gradually detached from the substrate while maintaining in situ cell shape and cytoskeletal integrity, and then stretched up to approximately 15% and unloaded three times at the rate of 1 mum every 5 s. Cell stiffness was approximately 20 nN per percent strain in the untreated case and decreased by approximately 65% and approximately 30% following AF and MT disruption, respectively. MT augmentation did not affect cell stiffness significantly. The roles of AFs and MTs in resisting cell stretching and shortening were assessed using the area retraction of the cell upon noninvasive detachment from thermoresponsive gelatin-coated dishes. The retraction was approximately 40% in untreated cells, while in AF-disrupted cells it was <20%. The retraction increased by approximately 50% and decreased by approximately 30% following MT disruption and augmentation, respectively, suggesting that MTs resist intercellular tension generated by AFs. Three-dimensional measurements of cell morphology using confocal microscopy revealed that the cell volume remained unchanged following drug treatment. A concomitant increase in cell height and decrease in cell area was observed following AF disruption and MT augmentation. In contrast, MT disruption significantly reduced the cell height. These results indicate that both AFs and MTs play crucial roles in maintaining whole cell mechanical properties of SMCs, and that while AFs act as an internal tension generator, MTs act as a tension reducer, and these contribute to intracellular force balance three dimensionally.

[1]  Kevin D. Costa,et al.  Osteoblast Elastic Modulus Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy Is Substrate Dependent , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Ivan Damjanov,et al.  Blood Vessels , 2004 .

[3]  Takeo Matsumoto,et al.  Mechanical Anisotropy of Rat Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells Decreases with Their Contraction , 2004 .

[4]  R. Rand,et al.  Water in actin polymerization. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[5]  B. Helmke Molecular control of cytoskeletal mechanics by hemodynamic forces. , 2005, Physiology.

[6]  Tensile Properties of Cultured Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells Obtained in a quasi-in situ Tensile Test with Thermoresponsive Gelatin , 2006 .

[7]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[8]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Jcb: Article Introduction , 2002 .

[9]  D E Ingber,et al.  Fibronectin controls capillary endothelial cell growth by modulating cell shape. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  P. Davies,et al.  Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. , 1995, Physiological reviews.

[11]  G. Wright,et al.  Remodeling of the Actin Cytoskeleton in the Contracting A7r5 Smooth Muscle Cell , 2004, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[12]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  J. Hoh,et al.  Surface morphology and mechanical properties of MDCK monolayers by atomic force microscopy , 1996 .

[14]  G. Wright,et al.  Ca2+-dependent actin remodeling in the contracting A7r5 cell , 2004, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[15]  H. Miyazaki,et al.  A newly designed tensile tester for cells and its application to fibroblasts. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Kazuaki Nagayama,et al.  A novel micro tensile tester with feed-back control for viscoelastic analysis of single isolated smooth muscle cells. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  V. Mow,et al.  The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  R M Nerem,et al.  Micropipette Aspiration of Cultured Bovine Aortic Endothelial Cells Exposed to Shear Stress , 1987, Arteriosclerosis.

[19]  P. Smith,et al.  Mechanical strain increases velocity and extent of shortening in cultured airway smooth muscle cells. , 1999, The American journal of physiology.

[20]  F Guilak,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  B A Danowski,et al.  Fibroblast contractility and actin organization are stimulated by microtubule inhibitors. , 1989, Journal of cell science.

[22]  D E Ingber,et al.  Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[23]  A. Reilein,et al.  APC is a component of an organizing template for cortical microtubule networks , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[24]  H. Haga,et al.  Time-lapse viscoelastic imaging of living fibroblasts using force modulation mode in AFM. , 2000, Journal of electron microscopy.

[25]  E. Elson,et al.  Contraction due to microtubule disruption is associated with increased phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Katsuya Sato,et al.  Local Disassembly of Actin Stress Fibers Induced by Selected Release of Intracellular Tension in Osteoblastic Cell , 2006 .

[27]  K. Nagayama,et al.  Local mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy for cultured bovine endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[29]  M S Kolodney,et al.  Isometric contraction by fibroblasts and endothelial cells in tissue culture: a quantitative study , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  Masaaki Sato,et al.  Smooth muscle cells freshly isolated from rat thoracic aortas are much stiffer than cultured bovine cells : Possible effect of phenotype , 2000 .

[31]  N Wang,et al.  Mechanical interactions among cytoskeletal filaments. , 1998, Hypertension.

[32]  M Nathan,et al.  Friction in airway smooth muscle: mechanism, latch, and implications in asthma. , 1996, Journal of applied physiology.

[33]  William E Kraus,et al.  Apparent elastic modulus and hysteresis of skeletal muscle cells throughout differentiation. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[34]  J. Hartwig,et al.  Mechanical Remodeling of the Endothelial Surface and Actin Cytoskeleton Induced by Fluid Flow , 1997, Microcirculation.

[35]  Michael Beil,et al.  Sphingosylphosphorylcholine regulates keratin network architecture and visco-elastic properties of human cancer cells , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[36]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  A. Flozak,et al.  Patterns of living beta-actin movement in wounded human coronary artery endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. , 2001, Experimental cell research.

[38]  U. Stock,et al.  Phenotypical plasticity of vascular smooth muscle cells-effect of in vitro and in vivo shear stress for tissue engineering of blood vessels. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[39]  Kevin D Costa,et al.  Buckling of actin stress fibers: a new wrinkle in the cytoskeletal tapestry. , 2002, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[40]  Shinji Deguchi,et al.  Tensile properties of single stress fibers isolated from cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  Tension and compression in the cytoskeleton of PC-12 neurites. II: Quantitative measurements. , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[42]  J. Bereiter-Hahn,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of f-actin, microtubules, f-actin/alpha-actinin, and f-actin/hexokinase determined in microliter volumes with a novel nondestructive method. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[43]  Julie H. Campbell,et al.  Vascular smooth muscle in culture , 1987 .

[44]  Takeo Matsumoto,et al.  Effect of actin filament distribution on tensile properties of smooth muscle cells obtained from rat thoracic aortas. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Fast and slow dynamics of the cytoskeleton , 2006, Nature materials.

[46]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[47]  Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.  Engineering cell shape and function. , 1994, Science.

[48]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[49]  L. Forró,et al.  Superficial and deep changes of cellular mechanical properties following cytoskeleton disassembly. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[50]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular tensegrity : defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton , 2022 .

[51]  R. Paul,et al.  Effects of microtubule disruption on force, velocity, stiffness and [Ca(2+)](i) in porcine coronary arteries. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[52]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Cytoskeletal remodelling and slow dynamics in the living cell , 2005, Nature materials.

[53]  Dimitrije Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. II. Contribution of microtubules. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[54]  Yaozhi Luo,et al.  A multi-modular tensegrity model of an actin stress fiber. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[55]  Ning Wang,et al.  Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells? , 1998, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[56]  G. Shue,et al.  The frequency response of smooth muscle stiffness during Ca2+-activated contraction. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[57]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Cellular adaptation to mechanical stress: role of integrins, Rho, cytoskeletal tension and mechanosensitive ion channels , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[58]  M. Chen,et al.  EB1 and APC bind to mDia to stabilize microtubules downstream of Rho and promote cell migration , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[59]  K. Peck,et al.  Genomic analysis of smooth muscle cells in three‐dimensional collagen matrix , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[60]  T. Matsuda,et al.  Thermoresponsive artificial extracellular matrix: N-isopropylacrylamide-graft-copolymerized gelatin , 2002, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[61]  Observation of Cell Shortening and Dynamic Changes of Actin Filaments during Cell Detachment from Thermoresponsive-Gelatin-Coated Substrate ∗ , 2005 .

[62]  Shinji Deguchi,et al.  Flow-induced hardening of endothelial nucleus as an intracellular stress-bearing organelle. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.