Real-world single centre use of JAK inhibitors across the rheumatoid arthritis pathway.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate real world efficacy of approved JAK inhibitors (JAKi) tofacitinib and baricitinib in a large, single-centre cohort of RA patients across the treatment pathway, including those refractory to multiple biologic drugs. METHODS All RA patients, treated with tofacitinib (from time of compassionate access scheme) or baricitinib since approval in 2017 had DAS28-CRP scores and components recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months (with retrospective data for compassionate access scheme). Efficacy was evaluated in the total cohort, each treatment group, and subgroups of number of prior biologic classes failed. RESULTS One hundred and fifteen patients were treated with a JAKi (tofacitinib 54, baricitinib 69, 8 both); 76.4% female; mean (SD) age 57.3 (14.3) years. On average patients had received 3 previous bDMARDs; 11 (9.6%) were bDMARD naïve. Combined group baseline DAS28-CRP (SD) 5.62(1.14) improved by 1.49(1.44) and 1.67(1.61) at 3 and 6 months respectively, comparable in individual JAKi groups; with 24% in at least low disease activity at 3 months. The biggest improvement was observed in the biologic-naïve group (mean DAS28-CRP improved from 5.16-2.14 after 6 months); whilst those with prior exposure to minimum 3 bDMARD classes had DAS28-CRP improvement of > 1.2. 5/8 patients treated with both JAKi sequentially responded. Twelve patients previously unresponsive to IL-6 blockade responded to JAKi. No unexpected safety events were recorded. Two cases of venous thrombo-embolism were observed. CONCLUSION JAK inhibition is effective in a real world population of RA patients, including in a subset of patients refractory to multiple previous bDMARDs.

[1]  R. Micheroli,et al.  Thromboembolic Safety Reporting of Tofacitinib and Baricitinib: An Analysis of the WHO VigiBase , 2020, Drug Safety.

[2]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of very early etanercept and MTX versus MTX with delayed etanercept in RA: the VEDERA trial , 2020, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  J. Kremer,et al.  Tofacitinib in Combination With Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Clinical Efficacy, Radiographic, and Safety Outcomes From a Twenty‐Four–Month, Phase III Study , 2019, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[4]  R. Westhovens Clinical efficacy of new JAK inhibitors under development. Just more of the same? , 2019, Rheumatology.

[5]  P. Taylor Clinical efficacy of launched JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis , 2019, Rheumatology.

[6]  E. Choy Clinical significance of Janus Kinase inhibitor selectivity , 2018, Rheumatology.

[7]  J. Isaacs,et al.  Biologic refractory disease in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2018, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  S. Hider,et al.  Thromboembolism with Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis: How Real is the Risk? , 2018, Drug Safety.

[9]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: an area of unmet clinical need. , 2018, Rheumatology.

[10]  M. Genovese,et al.  Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial , 2018, The Lancet.

[11]  M. Buch Defining refractory rheumatoid arthritis , 2018, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  Stanley B. Cohen,et al.  Worldwide, 3-Year, Post-Marketing Surveillance Experience with Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2018, Rheumatology and Therapy.

[13]  J. Kremer,et al.  Response to baricitinib based on prior biologic use in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis , 2018, Rheumatology.

[14]  J. Fonseca,et al.  Right drug, right patient, right time: aspiration or future promise for biologics in rheumatoid arthritis? , 2017, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[15]  Yoshiya Tanaka,et al.  Herpes Zoster and Tofacitinib: Clinical Outcomes and the Risk of Concomitant Therapy , 2017, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[16]  R. Moots,et al.  Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib with methotrexate, and adalimumab with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL Strategy): a phase 3b/4, double-blind, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[17]  D. Schwartz,et al.  JAK–STAT Signaling as a Target for Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases: Current and Future Prospects , 2017, Drugs.

[18]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Baricitinib, Methotrexate, or Combination in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and No or Limited Prior Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Treatment , 2017, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[19]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Baricitinib versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  G. Burmester,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of certolizumab pegol versus adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year efficacy and safety results from the randomised EXXELERATE study , 2016, The Lancet.

[21]  I. McInnes,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis , 2016, The Lancet.

[22]  M. Dougados,et al.  Baricitinib in patients with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic DMARDs: results from the RA-BUILD study , 2016, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[23]  J. Kremer,et al.  Baricitinib in Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  J. Smolen,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis therapy reappraisal: strategies, opportunities and challenges , 2015, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[25]  E. Lee,et al.  Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  John D Isaacs,et al.  Tofacitinib in Combination With Nonbiologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[27]  Tamas Koncz,et al.  Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[28]  M. Kosinski,et al.  Evaluating the efficacy of sequential biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors , 2011, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[29]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. , 1990, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.