Application of automation and information systems to forensic genetic specimen processing

During the last 10 years, the introduction of PCR-based DNA typing technologies in forensic applications has been highly successful. This technology has become pervasive throughout forensic laboratories and it continues to grow in prevalence. For many criminal cases, it provides the most probative evidence. Criminal genotype data banking and victim identification initiatives that follow mass-fatality incidents have benefited the most from the introduction of automation for sample processing and data analysis. Attributes of offender specimens including large numbers, high quality and identical collection and processing are ideal for the application of laboratory automation. The magnitude of kinship analysis required by mass-fatality incidents necessitates the application of computing solutions to automate the task. More recently, the development activities of many forensic laboratories are focused on leveraging experience from these two applications to casework sample processing. The trend toward increased prevalence of forensic genetic analysis will continue to drive additional innovations in high-throughput laboratory automation and information systems.

[1]  P Gill,et al.  Use of laser microdissection greatly improves the recovery of DNA from sperm on microscope slides. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[2]  R. Frappier,et al.  Developmental validation of a real-time quantitative PCR assay for automated quantification of human DNA. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  David J. Werrett,et al.  Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’ , 1985, Nature.

[4]  B. Sen,et al.  SAMP32, a Testis-Specific, Isoantigenic Sperm Acrosomal Membrane-Associated Protein1 , 2002, Biology of reproduction.

[5]  C J Flickinger,et al.  A male genital tract-specific carbohydrate epitope on human CD52: implications for immunocontraception. , 2002, Tissue antigens.

[6]  J M Curran,et al.  Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[7]  Mitchell M Holland,et al.  Development of a quality, high throughput DNA analysis procedure for skeletal samples to assist with the identification of victims from the World Trade Center attacks. , 2003, Croatian medical journal.

[8]  Mauro Melato,et al.  DNA Identification of Sperm Cells Collected and Sorted by Flow Cytometry , 2003, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[9]  H. D. Cash,et al.  Development Under Extreme Conditions: Forensic Bioinformatics in the Wake of the World Trade Center Disaster , 2002, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[10]  Stewart J. Fallon,et al.  Rapid, high fidelity analysis of simple sequence repeats on an electronically active DNA microchip. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  Ashley Hall,et al.  Novel Y-STR typing strategies reveal the genetic profile of the semen donor in extended interval post-coital cervicovaginal samples. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[12]  B. Leclair.  Large-scale comparative genotyping and kinship analysis: evolution in its use for human identification in mass fatality incidents and missing persons databasing , 2004 .

[13]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  An assessment of whether SNPs will replace STRs in national DNA databases--joint considerations of the DNA working group of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) and the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM). , 2004, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[14]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA , 1985, Nature.

[15]  Mark W. Perlin,et al.  Simple Reporting of Complex DNA Evidence: Automated Computer Interpretation , 2003 .

[16]  P. Gill,et al.  PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[17]  J Buckleton,et al.  Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[18]  Benoît Leclair,et al.  AmpFlSTR profiler Plus short tandem repeat DNA analysis of casework samples, mixture samples, and nonhuman DNA samples amplified under reduced PCR volume conditions (25 microL). , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  The application of an automated allele concordance analysis system (CompareCalls) to ensure the accuracy of single-source STR DNA profiles. , 2004, Journal of forensic sciences.

[20]  Katarina Lindroos,et al.  Genotyping SNPs by minisequencing primer extension using oligonucleotide microarrays. , 2003, Methods in molecular biology.

[21]  Robert G Cowell.  FINEX: a Probabilistic Expert System for forensic identification. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[22]  Alex M Garvin,et al.  Filtration based DNA preparation for sexual assault cases. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[23]  J A Lambert,et al.  Using a tree diagram to interpret a mixed DNA profile. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[24]  Benoît Leclair,et al.  Enhanced kinship analysis and STR-based DNA typing for human identification in mass fatality incidents: the Swissair flight 111 disaster. , 2004, Journal of forensic sciences.

[25]  A. Dawid,et al.  Probabilistic expert systems for DNA mixture profiling. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[26]  Peter Gill,et al.  An assessment of the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for forensic purposes , 2001, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[27]  C. H. Becker,et al.  Reliable genotyping of short tandem repeat loci without an allelic ladder using time-of-flight mass spectrometry , 1998, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[28]  J M Butler,et al.  Single nucleotide polymorphism determination using primer extension and time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[29]  P. Gill,et al.  Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[30]  R. Mathies,et al.  Fully integrated PCR-capillary electrophoresis microsystem for DNA analysis. , 2001, Lab on a chip.

[31]  J. Whitaker,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[32]  Benoît Leclair,et al.  STR DNA typing: increased sensitivity and efficient sample consumption using reduced PCR reaction volumes. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[33]  C Fregeau.  The National DNA Data Bank of Canada—a laboratory bench retrospective on the first year of operation , 2003 .

[34]  J A Lambert,et al.  Taking account of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[35]  Igor L. Medintz,et al.  Genotyping energy-transfer-cassette-labeled short-tandem-repeat amplicons with capillary array electrophoresis microchannel plates. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[36]  Michelle L Gaines,et al.  Reduced volume PCR amplification reactions using the AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus kit. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[37]  M W Perlin,et al.  Linear mixture analysis: a mathematical approach to resolving mixed DNA samples. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[38]  M. Heller.  DNA microarray technology: devices, systems, and applications. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[39]  B S Weir,et al.  Issues and strategies in the DNA identification of World Trade Center victims. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[40]  Peter M Vallone,et al.  High-throughput Y-STR typing of U.S. populations with 27 regions of the Y chromosome using two multiplex PCR assays. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[41]  Robert C Shaler,et al.  Evaluation of an automated liquid hybridization method for DNA quantitation. , 2004, Journal of forensic sciences.