Performance Test Results of the NASA-457m V2 Hall Thruster

Abstract Performance testing of a second generation, 50 kW-class Hall thruster labeled NASA-457M v2 was conducted at the NASA Glenn Research Center. This NASA-designed thruster is an excellent candidate for a solar electric propulsion system that supports human exploration missions. Thruster discharge power was varied from 5 to 50 kW over discharge voltage and current ranges of 200 to 500 V and 15 to 100 A, respectively. Anode efficiencies varied from 0.56 to 0.71. The peak efficiency was similar to that of other state-of-the-art high power Hall thrusters, but outperformed these thrusters at lower discharge voltages. The 0.05 to 0.18 higher anode efficiencies of this thruster compared to its predecessor were primarily due to which of two stable discharge modes the thruster was operated. One stable mode was at low magnetic field strengths, which produced high anode efficiencies, and the other at high magnetic fields where its predecessor was operated. Cathode keeper voltages were always within 2.1 to 6.2 V and cathode voltages were within 13 V of tank ground during high anode efficiency operation. However, during operation at high magnetic fields, cathode-to-ground voltage magnitudes increased dramatically, exceeding 30 V, due to the high axial magnetic field strengths in the immediate vicinity of the centrally-mounted cathode. The peak thrust was 2.3 N and this occurred at a total thruster input power of 50.0 kW at a 500 V discharge voltage. The thruster demonstrated a thrust-to-power range of 76.4 mN/kW at low power to 46.1 mN/kW at full power, and a specific impulse range of 1420 to 2740 s. For a discharge voltage of 300 V, where specific impulses would be about 2000 s, thrust efficiencies varied from 0.57 to 0.63.

[1]  Nathan J. Strange,et al.  300-kW Solar Electric Propulsion System Configuration for Human Exploration of Near-Earth Asteroids , 2011 .

[2]  V. Kim Main Physical Features and Processes Determining the Performance of Stationary Plasma Thrusters , 1998 .

[3]  Hani Kamhawi,et al.  A Commercial One Newton Hall Effect Thruster for High Power In-Space Missions , 2011 .

[4]  Lee S. Mason,et al.  NASA's Hall Thruster Program , 2001 .

[5]  Jeffrey M. Woytach,et al.  Feasibility of Large High-Powered Solar Electric Propulsion Vehicles: Issues and Solutions , 2013 .

[6]  Robert S. Jankovsky,et al.  Laboratory Model 50 kW Hall Thruster , 2002 .

[7]  Richard R. Hofer,et al.  Mass and Cost Model for Selecting Thruster Size in Electric Propulsion Systems , 2013 .

[8]  Robert S. Jankovsky,et al.  NASA's Hall Thruster Program 2002 , 2002 .

[9]  Hani Kamhawi,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the NASA-300M 20 kW Hall Thruster , 2011 .

[10]  Hani Kamhawi,et al.  Overview of Hall Thruster Activities at NASA Glenn Research Center , 2011 .

[11]  A. Gallimore,et al.  The Role of Magnetic Field Topography in Improving the Performance of High-Voltage Hall Thrusters , 2002 .

[12]  Lee S. Mason,et al.  Benefits of Power and Propulsion Technology for a Piloted Electric Vehicle to an Asteroid , 2011 .

[13]  P. Peterson,et al.  A High Specific Impulse Two-Stage Hall Thruster with Plasma Lens Focusing , 2001 .

[14]  Jared P. Squire,et al.  Development Toward a Spaceflight Capable VASIMR ® Engine and SEP Applications , 2014 .

[15]  David H. Manzella,et al.  NASA's 2004 Hall Thruster Program , 2013 .

[16]  David H. Manzella,et al.  The Performance and Wear Characterization of a High-Power High-Isp NASA Hall Thruster , 2005 .

[17]  John M. Sankovic,et al.  NASA's electric propulsion program , 1998 .

[18]  David H. Manzella,et al.  Investigation of Low Voltage/High Thrust Hall Thruster Operation , 2003 .

[19]  David H. Manzella,et al.  50 KW Class Krypton Hall Thruster Performance , 2003 .