In the version of LFG presented in Bresnan (1982), relation-changing processes were viewed as redundancy relationships between lexical entries which allowed the syntactic part of the theory to have a strongly monoto nic character. However, there are both empirical and substantive short comings with this approach to the lexicon. In this paper I outline these shortcomings, and then present a new theory of relation changes in LFG, often referred to as lexical mapping theory. Lexical mapping theory pro vides a theory of argument-structures, which mediate the mappings be tween semantic role in lexical relations and syntactic functions in f -struc ture. In the latter half of the paper I present the details and consequences of this theory, and also look at the principles constraining mappings that have been proposed in the recent literature.
[1]
Letitia R. Naigles,et al.
Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure
,
1991
.
[2]
Sung-Bum Lee.
Conditions on the Temporal Interpretation of Embedded Tenses
,
1990
.
[3]
B. Levin,et al.
The formation of adjectival passives
,
1985
.
[4]
Joan Bresnan,et al.
Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar
,
1989
.
[5]
Robert D. Van Valin,et al.
Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar
,
1984
.
[6]
Lioba J. Moshi,et al.
Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax
,
1990
.
[7]
Tara Warrier Mohanan,et al.
Arguments in Hindi
,
1990
.