Trend Visualization on Twitter: What's Hot and What's Not?

Twitter is a social networking service in which users can create short messages related to a wide variety of subjects. Certain subjects are highlighted by Twitter as the most popular subjects and are known as trending topics. In this paper, we study the visual representation of these trending topics to maximize the information toward the users in the most effective way. For this purpose, we present a new visual representation of the trending topics based on dynamic squarified treemaps. In order to use this visual representation, one needs to determine (preferably forecast) the speed at which tweets on a particular subject are posted and one needs to detect acceleration. Moreover, one needs efficient ways to relate topics to each other when necessary, so that clusters of related trending topics are formed to be more informative about a particular subject. We will outline the methodologies for determining the speed and acceleration, and for clustering. We show that the visualization using dynamic squarified treemaps has many benefits over other visualization techniques. Keywords-microblogging; Twitter; trend detection; clustering; visualization; dynamic squarified treemaps.

[1]  Hanan Samet,et al.  TwitterStand: news in tweets , 2009, GIS.

[2]  Hila Becker,et al.  Beyond Trending Topics: Real-World Event Identification on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[3]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Using mixture models for collaborative filtering , 2004, STOC '04.

[4]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Tag Clouds: Data Analysis Tool or Social Signaller? , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[6]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Getting our head in the clouds: toward evaluation studies of tagclouds , 2007, CHI.

[7]  Vikas Sindhwani,et al.  Emerging topic detection using dictionary learning , 2011, CIKM '11.

[8]  Jarke J. van Wijk,et al.  Squarified Treemaps , 2000, VisSym.

[9]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Semantic Grounding of Tag Relatedness in Social Bookmarking Systems , 2008, SEMWEB.

[10]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  Detecting Topic Drift with Compound Topic Models , 2009, ICWSM.

[11]  Anatole Gershman,et al.  Topical Clustering of Tweets , 2011 .

[12]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  James Allan,et al.  Text classification and named entities for new event detection , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[14]  Vikas Sindhwani,et al.  Learning evolving and emerging topics in social media: a dynamic nmf approach with temporal regularization , 2012, WSDM '12.

[15]  Satoshi Morinaga,et al.  Tracking dynamics of topic trends using a finite mixture model , 2004, KDD.

[16]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Seeing things in the clouds: the effect of visual features on tag cloud selections , 2008, Hypertext.

[17]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[18]  Luigi Di Caro,et al.  Using tagflake for condensing navigable tag hierarchies from tag clouds , 2008, KDD.

[19]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Characterizing Microblogs with Topic Models , 2010, ICWSM.

[20]  Derek Greene,et al.  ThemeCrowds: multiresolution summaries of twitter usage , 2011, SMUC '11.

[21]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Ordered treemap layouts , 2001, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001..

[22]  Anand Karandikar,et al.  Clustering short status messages: A topic model based approach , 2010 .

[23]  Daniel T. Larose,et al.  Discovering Knowledge in Data: An Introduction to Data Mining , 2005 .

[24]  Martin Halvey,et al.  An assessment of tag presentation techniques , 2007, WWW '07.