Challenges in developing and implementing a decision support systems (ETÇAP) in forest management planning: a case study in Honaz and Ibradı, Turkey

Decision support systems (DSSs) are indispensable tools in preparing a forest management plan for a better combination of multiple forest values. This study attempted to develop and explain a stand-based forest management DSS (Ecosystem-based multiple-use forest planning [ETÇAP]) comprising a traditional simulation, linear programming (LP), metaheuristics and geographic information system. The model consists of five submodels; traditional management approach to handle inventory data, an empirical growth and yield model, a simulation to conceptualize management actions, a LP technique to optimize resource allocation and a simulated annealing approach to directly create a spatially feasible harvest schedule. The ETÇAP model has been implemented in a comparative two case study areas; Denizli–Honaz and Akseki–Ibradı. Both simulation and optimization models outperformed to the traditional management plan. The periodical change of growing stock, allowable cuts, carbon sequestration and water production are used as performance indicators. The results showed that more amount of wood could be harvested over time compared to traditional level of harvesting. It could be concluded that various management strategies allowed managers to stimulate more decision options for better outputs through intertemporal trade-offs of management interventions as the model provided tools to quantify forest dynamics over time and space. Challenges exist to establish the functional relationships between forest structure and values for better quantification and integration into the management plans.

[1]  Sedat Keleş,et al.  Comparing multipurpose forest management with timber management, incorporating timber, carbon and oxygen values: A case study , 2008 .

[2]  Bengt Jonsson,et al.  The forest management planning package: theory and application , 1993 .

[3]  Sedat Keleş,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Forest Management Strategies on the Production of Forest Values: Timber, Carbon, Oxygen, Water, and Soil , 2010 .

[4]  Margarida Tomé,et al.  Modelling non-wood forest products in Europe: a review. , 2011 .

[5]  G. A. Jordan,et al.  Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes , 1995 .

[6]  Levy Ml,et al.  Europe a review , 1994 .

[7]  E. Z. Başkent,et al.  Modelling and analyzing timber production and carbon sequestration values of forest ecosystems: a case study , 2007 .

[8]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Dealing with Ecological Objectives in the Monsu Planning System , 2004 .

[9]  E. Z. Başkent,et al.  The Forest Management Planning System of Turkey: Constructive Criticism Towards the Sustainable Management of Forest Ecosystems , 2005 .

[10]  E. Z. Başkent,et al.  Developing and implementing participatory and ecosystem based multiple use forest management planning approach (ETÇAP): Yalnızçam case study ☆ , 2008 .

[11]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Forest management optimisation models when carbon captured is considered: a goal programming approach , 2003 .

[12]  H. M. Steven,et al.  Forest Management , 2020, Nature.

[13]  Sedat Keleş,et al.  Developing Alternative Forest Management Planning Strategies Incorporating Timber, Water and Carbon Values: An Examination of their Interactions , 2009 .

[14]  Ugur Sevik,et al.  A GIS-based decision support system for forest management plans in Turkey. , 2010 .

[15]  Sedat Keleş,et al.  Joint production of timber and water: a case study , 2011 .

[16]  Birger Solberg,et al.  Potential and Economic Efficiency of Carbon Sequestration in Forest Biomass Through Silvicultural Management , 1994 .

[17]  S. Keleş,et al.  A computer-based optimization model for multiple use forest management planning: a case study from Turkey. , 2011 .

[18]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  The Heureka Forestry Decision Support System: An Overview , 2011, Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci..

[19]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  Managing forest and marginal agricultural land for multiple tradeoffs: compromising on economic, carbon and structural diversity objectives , 2005 .

[20]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  HARVEST: linking timber harvesting strategies to landscape patterns , 1999 .

[21]  Omar Masera,et al.  Modeling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: the CO2FIX V.2 approach , 2003 .

[22]  T. Lämås,et al.  A model for regional analysis of carbon sequestration and timber production , 2005 .

[23]  Anssi Ahtikoski,et al.  Applying the MOTTI simulator to analyse the effects of alternative management schedules on timber and non-timber production , 2005 .

[24]  H. L. Scheurman,et al.  Techniques for Prescribing Optimal Timber Harvest and Investment Under Different Objectives—Discussion and Synthesis , 1977 .

[25]  L. Duckstein,et al.  A multiobjective decision support system for multiresource forest management , 1998 .