Influence of Orifice Position Deviations on Distribution Performance of Gravity-Type Liquid Distributor Analyzed Through Mathematical Pathway

The distribution performance of the gravity-type liquid distributor (GTLD) significantly affects column operation efficiency and the consequent product quality. In industrial settings, maldistribution is normally considered to be caused by vertical positional or coplanarity errors stemming from deflections associated with manufacture and installation, or even by excessive weight. The lack of estimation protocols or standards impedes the description of this error, which influences the corresponding outflow rates. Given this situation, the paper proposes a lumped parameter, orifice position deviation (OPD), to facilitate the calculation of the relative discharge rate error (RDRE) based on a formula derivation, which allows the systematic analysis of the influence of a single orifice or weir OPD. The paper introduces a sensitivity factor K as a concise and unified expression in theoretical RDREs for calibrating the influence of OPD on the RDREs of geometrically different orifices and weirs. With respect to the GTLD, a larger K indicates the need for more strict OPD requirements. The paper verifies that the extent of GTLD outflow nonuniformity is associated with diverging tendencies regarding its morphology, especially in the orifice and weir, which can be determined using our proposed procedures.

[1]  S. Barfuss,et al.  Discharge Coefficient Performance of Venturi, Standard Concentric Orifice Plate, V-cone and Wedge Flow Meters at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2011 .

[2]  Peifang Fu,et al.  The influence of back pressure on the flow discharge coefficients of plain orifice nozzle , 2013 .

[3]  Joseph B. Franzini,et al.  Fluid Mechanics with Engineering Applications. 6th Ed. By R. L.DAUGHERTY and J. B. FRANZINI. McGraw-Hill. 1965. 574 pp. $9.95 or 80s. Fluid Dynamics. By J. W. DAILY and D. R. F. HARLEMAN. Addison Wesley. 1966. 454 pp. $12.50 or 94s. , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Lothar Spiegel,et al.  A new method to assess liquid distributor quality , 2006 .

[5]  Liu Yansheng Characteristics of vertical sharp-edged orifice discharge(III) Effect of geometry on orifice discharge coefficient , 2009 .

[6]  Ahmad Shariat,et al.  Packing Efficiency Testing on a Commercial Scale with Good (and Not So Good) Reflux Distribution , 1995 .

[7]  C. Jan,et al.  Discharge Coefficient for a Water Flow through a Bottom Orifice of a Conical Hopper , 2010 .

[8]  Takashi Yanagi,et al.  Commercial scale experiments that provide insight on packed tower distributors , 1987 .

[9]  Wu Hao,et al.  Characteristics of vertical sharp-edged orifice discharge(I) Effect of flow regime and configuration parameters on orifice discharge coefficient , 2008 .

[10]  Chaoyu Yan,et al.  A criterion for flow mechanisms through vertical sharp-edged orifice and model for the orifice discharge coefficient , 2011 .

[11]  Dong Wang,et al.  Study on discharge coefficient of perforated orifices as a new kind of flowmeter , 2013 .