Localization of Primary Auditory Cortex in Humans by Magnetoencephalography

Brief auditory stimuli activate the primary auditory cortex (PAC) earlier than any other cortical area so, within a certain latency range, the PAC is the only cortical source contributing to the auditory evoked field (AEF). Nevertheless, there is no AEF component specific to PAC that can be reliably detected in all individuals. The present study suggests that a peak in the first temporal derivative of the magnetic field at about 20 ms (dP20m) is a genuine correlate of PAC activity. AEFs in response to clicks presented to the right ear were recorded with a 37-channel axial gradiometer system positioned over the left hemisphere in nine normal-hearing subjects. More than 8500 stimuli were presented in each of two independent sessions at a rate of approximately 3/s. The dipole coordinates for the dP20m derived from the two sessions typically differed by only a few millimeters. Coregistration of the dipoles with structural magnetic resonance images suggests that dP20m arises from an area close to the retroinsular origin of Heschl's gyrus. Although the dP20m is simply the point of steepest slope on the well-known middle-latency peak, P30m or Pam, it would appear that dP20m and P30m do not have the same cortical origin. Evidence is provided that P30m receives major contributions from at least two distinct cortical areas, only one of which is PAC.

[1]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Cortical origin of middle-latency auditory evoked responses in man , 1987, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  Source localization of middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields , 1996 .

[3]  T. Elbert,et al.  Oscillatory Event-Related Brain Dynamics , 1994, NATO ASI Series.

[4]  Christo Pantev,et al.  Human auditory middle latency responses: influence of stimulus type and intensity , 2001, Hearing Research.

[5]  J M Badier,et al.  Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  C. Leonard,et al.  Normal variation in the frequency and location of human auditory cortex landmarks. Heschl's gyrus: where is it? , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[8]  William H. Press,et al.  Book-Review - Numerical Recipes in Pascal - the Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[9]  P. Morosan,et al.  Human Primary Auditory Cortex: Cytoarchitectonic Subdivisions and Mapping into a Spatial Reference System , 2001, NeuroImage.

[10]  N. Kraus,et al.  Auditory middle-latency responses in humans. , 1983, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[11]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[12]  Yoshihiro Hirata,et al.  Cortical sources of middle latency responses of auditory evoked magnetic field , 1995, Hearing Research.

[13]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[14]  Daniel S. O'Leary,et al.  An MRI-Based Parcellation Method for the Temporal Lobe , 2000, NeuroImage.

[15]  Jelliffe.  Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde , 1910 .

[16]  Bernd Lütkenhöner,et al.  High-Precision Neuromagnetic Study of the Functional Organization of the Human Auditory Cortex , 1998, Audiology and Neurotology.

[17]  W. Menke.  Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[18]  M. Scherg,et al.  Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  Bernd Lütkenhöner,et al.  Brain stem auditory evoked fields in response to clicks , 2000, Neuroreport.

[20]  Fast temporal interactions in human auditory cortex , 2000, Neuroreport.

[21]  S. Knecht,et al.  Latency of Auditory Evoked Field Deflection N100m Ruled by Pitch or Spectrum? , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.

[22]  M Hoke,et al.  On the biomagnetic inverse problem in the case of multiple dipoles. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[23]  I. Hashimoto,et al.  Neuromagnetic measurements of the human primary auditory response. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  B. Lutkenhoner.  Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation. II. Experimental evaluation , 1998 .

[25]  B. Lutkenhoner,et al.  Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation I. Theory and simulations. , 1998 .

[26]  P. Chauvel,et al.  Localization of the primary auditory area in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  K. Zilles,et al.  Structural divisions and functional fields in the human cerebral cortex 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 20 February 1998. 1 , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[28]  C. Pantev,et al.  Time- and Frequency-Domain Analyses of Auditory Evoked Fields , 1994 .

[29]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Whole-head mapping of middle-latency auditory evoked magnetic fields. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  P. Berg,et al.  Use of prior knowledge in brain electromagnetic source analysis , 2005, Brain Topography.

[31]  M. Scherg,et al.  Frequency-Specific Sources of the Auditory N19-P30-P50 Response Detected by a Multiple Source Analysis of Evoked Magnetic Fields and Potentials , 1989 .

[32]  Samuel J. Williamson,et al.  Advances in Biomagnetism , 1990, Springer US.

[33]  B. Lütkenhöner.  Current dipole localization with an ideal magnetometer system. , 1996, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[34]  F. Perrin,et al.  Sequential mapping favours the hypothesis of distinct generators for Na and Pa middle latency auditory evoked potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  B. Lütkenhöner.  Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation I. Theory and simulations. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Cellular generators of the cortical auditory evoked potential initial component. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  B. Lütkenhöner.  Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation. II. Experimental evaluation. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  G. Barkley,et al.  Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping: Auditory evoked fields , 2005, Brain Topography.

[39]  P. Morosan,et al.  Probabilistic Mapping and Volume Measurement of Human Primary Auditory Cortex , 2001, NeuroImage.

[40]  P. Chauvel,et al.  Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[42]  O Bertrand,et al.  Multiple supratemporal sources of magnetic and electric auditory evoked middle latency components in humans. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.