A review on the current state of urine cytology emphasizing the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct to diagnosis

Urinary cytology has a significant role in the detection and surveillance of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC), which has a high morbidity rate in the United States. Examination of the urine is a comprehensive screen of both the upper and lower urinary tract and is ideal for detecting both primary bladder UC and synchronous or metachronous, multifocal UCs that commonly occur because of a “field effect.” This field effect is the result of both clonal and random genetic abnormalities that have resulted from exposure to carcinogens (most frequently in tobacco smoke) in conjunction with the individual's ability to repair DNA damage. Although urinary cytology has high specificity for the detection of UC, its sensitivity is relatively low, especially for more prevalent low‐grade tumors. Consequently, several urine‐based tests have been investigated, some of which are available commercially and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. However, these tests also have their limitations and often have lower specificity than urinary cytology. Consequently, urinary cytology, which is a noninvasive, cost‐effective test, continues in mainstream use because of its ability to detect high‐grade, flat lesions that can be difficult to detect clinically and that often have more aggressive biologic behavior. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

[1]  K. Halling,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnostic cytology. , 2007, Human pathology.

[2]  H. Moussa,et al.  Comparative study of NMP-22, telomerase, and BTA in the detection of bladder cancer. , 2005, Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute.

[3]  J. Epstein,et al.  Non‐invasive papillary urothelial neoplasms: The 2004 WHO/ISUP classification system , 2010, Pathology international.

[4]  T. Tammela,et al.  Differences between local and review urinary cytology in diagnosis of bladder cancer. An interobserver multicenter analysis. , 2002, European urology.

[5]  K. The Proteinchip @ Biomarker System from Ciphergen Biosystems : a novel proteomics platform for rapid biomarker discovery and validation , 2022 .

[6]  M. Marberger,et al.  Can urine bound diagnostic tests replace cystoscopy in the management of bladder cancer? , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[7]  J. Cheville,et al.  A comparison of BTA stat, hemoglobin dipstick, telomerase and Vysis UroVysion assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[8]  A. K. Agarwal,et al.  Exclusion criteria enhance the specificity and positive predictive value of NMP22 and BTA stat. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[9]  J. Jones,et al.  Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[10]  W. Kassouf,et al.  Biomarkers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. , 2013, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[11]  D. Redelmeier,et al.  Comparison of molecular and conventional strategies for followup of superficial bladder cancer using decision analysis. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[12]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Performance of urine test in patients monitored for recurrence of bladder cancer: a multicenter study in the United States. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[13]  D. Swinkels,et al.  Detection of telomerase activity in urine as a tool for noninvasive detection of recurrent bladder tumors is poor and cannot be improved by timing of sampling. , 2000, Clinical chemistry.

[14]  Yao-Ling Lee,et al.  Evaluation of nuclear matrix protein-22 as a clinical diagnostic marker for bladder cancer. , 2004, Urology.

[15]  M. Cohen,et al.  The cytologic diagnosis of low-grade transitional cell carcinoma. , 2000, American journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  S. Bastacky,et al.  Cytologic diagnosis of low‐grade papillary urothelial neoplasms (low malignant potential and low‐grade carcinoma) in the context of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification , 2003, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[17]  H. Huland,et al.  A side by side comparison of cytology and biomarkers for bladder cancer detection. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[18]  Y S Erozan,et al.  Molecular Detection of Primary Bladder Cancer by Microsatellite Analysis , 1996, Science.

[19]  C. Dinney,et al.  Molecular markers of urothelial cancer and their use in the monitoring of superficial urothelial cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  W M Murphy,et al.  Urinary cytology and bladder cancer. The cellular features of transitional cell neoplasms , 1984, Cancer.

[21]  R. Tubbs,et al.  Reflex UroVysion testing of bladder cancer surveillance patients with equivocal or negative urine cytology: a prospective study with focus on the natural history of anticipatory positive findings. , 2007, American journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  G. Wright,et al.  Development of a novel proteomic approach for the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in urine. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[23]  T. Sebo,et al.  Analysis of polyomavirus-infected renal transplant recipients' urine specimens: correlation of routine urine cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and digital image analysis. , 2005, American journal of clinical pathology.

[24]  C. Roehrborn,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of a modified care protocol substituting bladder tumor markers for cystoscopy for the followup of patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a decision analytical approach. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[25]  M. Soloway,et al.  Should we abandon the FISH test? , 2007, European urology.

[26]  V. Pankratz,et al.  Monitoring intravesical therapy for superficial bladder cancer using fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[27]  J. Bentz,et al.  “FISHing” to detect urinary and other cancers , 2010, Cancer cytopathology.

[28]  K. Halling,et al.  Bladder Cancer Detection Using FISH (UroVysion Assay) , 2008, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[29]  H. Zincke,et al.  Carcinoma in Situ of the Bladder , 1980, Cancer.

[30]  S. Raab,et al.  Low‐grade urothelial carcinoma: Reappraisal of the cytologic criteria on ThinPrep® , 2003, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[31]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Genetic instability and transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder , 2004, BJU international.

[32]  O. Cussenot,et al.  Assessment of microsatellite instability in urine in the detection of transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder. , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[33]  L. Valiquette,et al.  Economic evaluation of NMP22 in the management of bladder cancer. , 2000, The Canadian journal of urology.

[34]  M. Marberger,et al.  uCyt+ test: alternative to cystoscopy for less-invasive follow-up of patients with low risk of urothelial carcinoma. , 2006, Urology.

[35]  A. Pycha,et al.  Multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridisation: prognostic perspectives in superficial bladder cancer , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[36]  J. Rajfer,et al.  Surveillance of patients with bladder carcinoma using fluorescent in‐situ hybridization on bladder washings , 2007, BJU international.

[37]  B. Fox,et al.  The promising future of proteomics in cancer diagnosis and treatment , 2005, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[38]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[39]  R Y Ball,et al.  Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs , 2005 .

[40]  J. Witjes,et al.  UroVysion compared with cytology and quantitative cytology in the surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. , 2007, European urology.

[41]  Na Mi,et al.  Comparative study of NMP-22, telomerase, and BTA in the detection of bladder cancer. , 2005 .

[42]  J. Laudadio,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization for detecting transitional cell carcinoma: implications for clinical practice , 2005, BJU international.

[43]  M. Luján,et al.  Reliability of the Routine Cytological Diagnosis in Bladder Cancer , 1999, European Urology.

[44]  J Lundin,et al.  A public-domain image processing tool for automated quantification of fluorescence in situ hybridisation signals , 2007, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[45]  B. Têtu,et al.  ImmunoCyt/uCyt+™ improves the sensitivity of urine cytology in patients followed for urothelial carcinoma , 2005, Modern Pathology.

[46]  B. Liu,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of NMP-22, telomerase, and BTA in the detection of human bladder cancer. , 1999, Urology.

[47]  H. Klocker,et al.  Microsatellite alterations in human bladder cancer: detection of tumor cells in urine sediment and tumor tissue. , 2002, European urology.

[48]  Tullio Sulser,et al.  Multi‐target fluorescence in situ hybridization in bladder washings for prediction of recurrent bladder cancer , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[49]  G. Kristiansen,et al.  Prognostic accuracy of individual uropathologists in noninvasive urinary bladder carcinoma: a multicentre study comparing the 1973 and 2004 World Health Organisation classifications. , 2010, European urology.

[50]  A. Agarwal,et al.  NMP22: a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer. , 1999, Anticancer research.

[51]  J. Epstein,et al.  The new World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) classification for TA, T1 bladder tumors: is it an improvement? , 2003, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[52]  Anirban P. Mitra,et al.  Molecular pathogenesis and diagnostics of bladder cancer. , 2009, Annual review of pathology.

[53]  W. Lutzeyer,et al.  Natural history and treatment of low and high risk superficial bladder tumors. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[54]  O. Nanni,et al.  Relevance of urine telomerase in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. , 2005, JAMA.

[55]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2009 , 2009, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[56]  E. Zwarthoff,et al.  Bladder cancer biomarkers and their role in surveillance and screening , 2009, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[57]  D J O'Kane,et al.  A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[58]  A. Rauch,et al.  Clinical decisions for treatment of different staged bladder cancer based on multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assays? , 2006, World Journal of Urology.

[59]  M. Cohen,et al.  Low-grade transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: application of select cytologic criteria to improve diagnostic accuracy [corrected]. , 1996, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[60]  S. Johansson,et al.  Use of a multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to diagnose bladder cancer in patients with hematuria. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[61]  L. Liou Urothelial cancer biomarkers for detection and surveillance. , 2006, Urology.

[62]  Alberto Redaelli,et al.  The health economics of bladder cancer: a comprehensive review of the published literature. , 2003, PharmacoEconomics.

[63]  A. Woodman,et al.  A study comparing various noninvasive methods of detecting bladder cancer in urine , 2002, BJU international.

[64]  Yair Lotan,et al.  Quantitation of Aurora kinase A gene copy number in urine sediments and bladder cancer detection. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[65]  I. Kovalszky,et al.  Detection of bladder cancer from the urine using fluorescencein situ hybridization technique , 2008, Pathology & Oncology Research.

[66]  Theo M de Reijke,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization: a multitarget approach in diagnosis and management of urothelial cancer , 2007, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[67]  L. Bubendorf,et al.  DNA image cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization for noninvasive detection of urothelial tumors in voided urine , 2002, Cancer.

[68]  H. Huland,et al.  Comparison of the ImmunoCyt test and urinary cytology with other urine tests in the detection and surveillance of bladder cancer , 2004, World Journal of Urology.

[69]  S. Wilczynski,et al.  The accuracy of urinary cytology in daily practice , 1999, Cancer.

[70]  S. Jhanwar,et al.  Reflex UroVysion testing in suspicious urine cytology cases , 2009, Cancer.

[71]  P. Schellhammer,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a multi-target fluorescent in situ hybridization assay for detection of bladder cancer. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[72]  L. Bubendorf,et al.  The prognostic value of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the follow‐up of nonmuscle‐invasive bladder cancer after intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin therapy , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[73]  T. Lörch,et al.  New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals , 2004, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[74]  Q. Ma,et al.  Comparison of seven screening methods in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. , 2006, Chinese Medical Journal.

[75]  M. Swellam,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the nuclear matrix protein, fibronectin, urinary bladder cancer antigen and voided urine cytology in the detection of bladder tumors. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[76]  S. Raab,et al.  Cytologic Detection of Urothelial Lesions , 2006 .

[77]  O. Hakenberg,et al.  Comparative diagnostic value of urine cytology, UBC-ELISA, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder in routine clinical practice. , 2007, Urology.

[78]  K. Loughlin,et al.  Economic impact of tumor markers in bladder cancer surveillance. , 2008, Urology.

[79]  Edward Messing,et al.  Surveillance for recurrent bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay. , 2006, JAMA.

[80]  S. Loening,et al.  Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[81]  M. Raitanen,et al.  Effect of Intravesical Instillations on the Human Complement Factor H Related Protein (BTA stat) Test , 2001, European Urology.

[82]  I. Leibovitch,et al.  Combined analysis of morphology and fluorescence in situ hybridization significantly increases accuracy of bladder cancer detection in voided urine samples. , 2005, Urology.