Fostering deep and elaborative learning and generic (soft) skill development: the strategic use of case studies in accounting education

It is vital that accounting educators take responsibility for the development of students' generic (soft) skills in conjunction with, discipline-specific skills. Research indicates that the typical learning styles of accounting students are not suited to the acquisition of generic skills. In this paper learning theory is used to provide a framework to support the use of case studies as a tool to promote appropriate learning styles and thereby enhance generic skill development. The paper details a number of strategies that may be implemented with case studies to achieve these goals. The implications for accounting educators, which are significant, are discussed.

[1]  D. Clark,et al.  Emerging competencies for the practice of accountancy , 1991 .

[2]  C. Argyris.  Some Limitations of the Case Method: Experiences in a Management Development Program , 1980 .

[3]  J. Biggs.  Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes , 1979 .

[4]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Alternative instructional strategies for creative and critical thinking in the accounting curriculum , 1998 .

[5]  D. Kagan.  The social implications of higher level thinking skills , 1987 .

[6]  Carel M. Wolk,et al.  Accounting educators' problem-solving style and their pedagogical perceptions and preferences , 1997 .

[7]  Hughie Hughes,et al.  Tradition or enlightenment: philosophical choice in accounting academia , 1999 .

[8]  V. Beattie,et al.  Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? , 1997 .

[9]  W. James,et al.  Accounting education: a cooperative learning strategy , 1994 .

[10]  D. Stout.  Experiential evidence and recommendations regarding case-based teaching in undergraduate cost accounting , 1996 .

[11]  C. Guilding,et al.  Knowledge and the academic accountant: An empirical study , 1993 .

[12]  Wickham Skinner,et al.  Casing Casemethod Methods , 1977 .

[13]  John Biggs,et al.  Approaches to the Enhancement of Tertiary Teaching , 1989 .

[14]  Paul Ramsden,et al.  Student Learning Research: Retrospect and Prospect , 1985 .

[15]  L. Hand,et al.  Fostering deep and active learning through assessment , 1996 .

[16]  T. Tinker,et al.  A mind is a wonderful thing to waste: “think like a commodity”, become a CPA , 1997 .

[17]  Eileen Trotter,et al.  TEACHING NOTE Promoting participation-breathing new life into the old technology of a traditional tutorial: a teaching note , 1998 .

[18]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[19]  Paul G. Schloemer,et al.  The Personality Types and Preferences of CPA Firm Professionals: An Analysis of Changes in the Profession , 1997 .

[20]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[21]  L. Kloot,et al.  Developing Strategic Supplier Alliances in the Australian Automotive Industry: A Case Study , 1998 .

[22]  Abd El-Rahman,et al.  Improving the quality of student learning , 2003 .

[23]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes , 1991 .

[24]  D. Kolb.  The learning style inventory: technical manual , 1976 .

[25]  Divesh S. Sharma,et al.  Accounting students' learning conceptions, approaches to learning, and the influence of the learning–teaching context on approaches to learning , 1997 .

[26]  P. Schludermann,et al.  The Root of the Problem , 2007, Science.

[27]  J. Kurfiss.  Critical thinking : theory, research, practice, and possibilities , 1990 .

[28]  Applying the case method in accounting: A comment , 1988 .

[29]  J. Biggs.  What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.

[30]  Moshe F. Rubinstein,et al.  Tools for thinking and problem solving , 1985 .

[31]  C. Paisey,et al.  A wolf in sheep's clothing? Teaching by objectives in accounting in higher education , 1996 .

[32]  David R. Fordham,et al.  Critical thinking in the public accounting profession: aptitudes and attitudes , 1998 .

[33]  Hilary Brown,et al.  Accounting education: A learning-styles study of professional-technical and future adaptation issues , 1987 .

[34]  Maurice L. Hirsch,et al.  Critical thinking and communication skills: Integration and implementation issues , 1992 .

[35]  J. Kurfiss.  Helping faculty foster students' critical thinking in the disciplines , 1989 .

[36]  Sharon Fraser,et al.  Why Open Learning , 1997 .

[37]  Jenice P. Stewart,et al.  Using case studies in teaching accounting: a quasi-experimental study , 1993 .

[38]  John I. Reynolds.  There's Method In Cases , 1978 .

[39]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[40]  Loren A. Nikolai,et al.  Personality types of accounting students and faculty: comparisons and implications , 1997 .

[41]  P. Booth,et al.  The quality of learning in accounting education: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance , 1999 .

[42]  David E. Stout,et al.  Incorporating writing techniques in the accounting classroom: Experience in financial, managerial and cost courses , 1989 .

[43]  David Watkins,et al.  Depth of processing and the quality of learning outcomes , 1983 .

[44]  Teaching as an interactive process , 1980 .

[45]  Rh Walker,et al.  A case for more integrative multi‐disciplinary marketing education , 1998 .

[46]  K. Crooker,et al.  Student perceptions of the profession and its effect on decisions to major in accounting , 1999 .

[47]  David S. Karpin,et al.  Enterprising nation : renewing Australia's managers to meet the challenges of the Asia-Pacific century : report of the Industry Task Force on Leadership and Management Skills , 1995 .

[48]  Morray van Ments.  The Effective Use of Role‐play: Practical Techniques for Improving Learning (2nd ed.) , 1999 .