The eye of the beholder: The influence of intuition, rationality, and leeway on the assessment of an Idea's market-creation potential

Abstract Paradoxically, mature firms facing competition in mature markets attempt to enter new markets, yet often pursue incremental ideas in their new product development process (NPD), abandoning ideas with market-creating potential in the idea evaluation phase at the fuzzy front end of NPD. We assume that idea evaluators' information-processing style (rational or intuitive) plays a dominant role in this context. Previous research has shown that the holistic information-processing style of intuitive individuals helps them with tasks that involve generating creative ideas, and we expect it to also be beneficial during idea evaluation for sensing an idea's potential to create new markets. In addition, we predict that the systematic procedure to be followed in formalized NPD idea evaluation will stifle this ability. Drawing on data from 138 corporate idea evaluators, we show that evaluators with an intuitive cognitive style are more likely to emphasize new market creation than those with a rational style, and that leeway serves as a moderator. By linking information-processing style and leeway we provide a potential explanation for why highly formalized organizations find it difficult to develop innovations with a high market-creation potential, and we discuss the practical implications of this.

[1]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Managing the Unmanageable: The Fuzzy Front End of Innovation , 2014 .

[2]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  How Does Bureaucracy Impact Individual Creativity? A Cross-Level Investigation of Team Contextual Influences on Goal Orientation–Creativity Relationships , 2011 .

[3]  E. Naveh,et al.  The Effect of Conformist and Attentive-To-Detail Members on Team Innovation: Reconciling the Innovation Paradox , 2011 .

[4]  Fred Langerak,et al.  Using intuition in fuzzy front-end decision-making: : A conceptual framework , 2014 .

[5]  Gianluca Carnabuci,et al.  Social Networks, Cognitive Style, and Innovative Performance: A Contingency Perspective , 2015 .

[6]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  The Role of Intuition in Strategic Decision Making , 2009 .

[7]  Martin Carlsson‐Wall,et al.  Opening the black box of the role of accounting practices in the fuzzy front-end of product innovation , 2015 .

[8]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  An experiential thinking style: its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures. , 2011, Journal of personality.

[9]  Mitzi M. Montoya,et al.  Exploring New Product Development Project Review Practices , 2009 .

[10]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[11]  Danit Ein-Gar,et al.  Not all great minds think alike: systematic and intuitive cognitive styles. , 2014, Journal of personality.

[12]  Christopher W. Allinson,et al.  The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition‐Analysis For Organizational Research , 1996 .

[13]  Peter Robbins,et al.  Innovating the Innovation Process: An Organisational Experiment in Global Pharma Pursuing Radical Innovation , 2015 .

[14]  Simone M. Ritter,et al.  Creativity: Intuitive processing outperforms deliberative processing in creative idea selection , 2017 .

[15]  D. Slevin,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior , 1991 .

[16]  S. Hart,et al.  Industrial companies' evaluation criteria in new product development gates , 2003 .

[17]  Vishal Gupta,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation and firm value: Does managerial discretion play a role? , 2018 .

[18]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Stage-Gate Controls, Learning Failure, and Adverse Effect on Novel New Products , 2008 .

[19]  Fiona Schweitzer,et al.  Forward-looking search during innovation projects: Under which conditions it impacts innovativeness , 2019, Technovation.

[20]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Developing New-to-the-Firm Products: The Role of Micropolitical Strategies , 2012 .

[21]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  B. Verworn A structural equation model of the impact of the “fuzzy front end” on the success of new product development , 2009 .

[23]  Enzo Valenzi,et al.  ASSESSING RATIONAL AND INTUITIVE STYLES: A HUMAN INFORMATION PROCESSING METAPHOR , 1990 .

[24]  M. Martinsuo,et al.  Use of Evaluation Criteria and Innovation Performance in the Front End of Innovation , 2011 .

[25]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations’ Filtering of Suggestions in Crowdsourcing , 2014 .

[26]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  The role of path dependency and managerial intentionality: a perspective on international business research , 2007 .

[27]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. , 1990 .

[28]  Mark P. Rice,et al.  New Market Creation for Breakthrough Innovations: Enabling and Constraining Mechanisms , 2013 .

[29]  Wallace E. Carroll,et al.  Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge , 2001 .

[30]  R. Cooper The drivers of success in new-product development , 2019, Industrial Marketing Management.

[31]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Overhauling the new product process , 1996 .

[32]  E. Naveh,et al.  Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? , 2004 .

[33]  Erik Dane,et al.  Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making , 2007 .

[34]  Patrick Spieth,et al.  The influence of resistance to change on evaluating an innovation project's innovativeness and risk: A sensemaking perspective , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[35]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications , 2003 .

[36]  D. Hoffman,et al.  The Fit of Thinking Style and Situation: New Measures of Situation-Specific Experiential and Rational Cognition , 2007 .

[37]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Managing the Front End of Innovation—Less Fuzzy, Yet Still Not Fully Understood , 2017 .

[38]  John Hayes,et al.  Cognitive Style and the Theory and Practice of Individual and Collective Learning in Organizations , 1998 .

[39]  J. Nevin,et al.  Explicating Hearing the Voice of the Customer as a Manifestation of Customer Focus and Assessing its Consequences , 2012 .

[40]  Patrick Spieth,et al.  THE INTERACTION OF INTUITION AND RATIONALITY DURING ESCALATED NPD DECISIONS: AN INVESTIGATION OF DECISION-MAKERS’ AFFECTIVE STATES , 2020, International Journal of Innovation Management.

[41]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[42]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[43]  Justin M. Berg When silver is gold: Forecasting the potential creativity of initial ideas , 2019, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

[44]  B. Skiera,et al.  Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product Ideas: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets , 2012 .

[45]  A. Rodríguez-Escudero,et al.  Criteria Employed For Go/No-Go Decisions When Developing Successful Highly Innovative Products , 2004 .

[46]  Maheshkumar P. Joshi,et al.  Antecedents of Innovativeness in Technology-Based Services (TBS): Peering into the Black Box of Entrepreneurial Orientation , 2015, Decis. Sci..

[47]  A. Zellner An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .

[48]  Fred Langerak,et al.  Consistency Matters in Formally Selecting Incremental and Radical New Product Ideas for Advancement , 2016 .

[49]  Jeffrey Loewenstein,et al.  Reframing the Decision-Makers’ Dilemma: Towards a Social Context Model of Creative Idea Recognition , 2017 .

[50]  John C. Narver,et al.  Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. , 2004 .

[51]  R. Verganti Planned Flexibility: Linking Anticipation and Reaction in Product Development Projects , 1999 .

[52]  R. Chandy,et al.  Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals , 2003 .

[53]  M. Kirton Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[54]  Sven Molner,et al.  Lost in a Universe of Markets: Toward a Theory of Market Scoping for Early-Stage Technologies , 2019, Journal of Marketing.

[55]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Personal Need for Structure and Creative Performance: The Moderating Influence of Fear of Invalidity , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[56]  Steven J. Armstrong,et al.  Individual Differences in Cognitive Style and their Effects on Task and Social Orientations of Self-Managed Work Teams , 2001 .

[57]  Sören Salomo,et al.  Measuring New Product Portfolio Innovativeness: How Differences in Scale Width and Evaluator Perspectives Affect its Relationship with Performance , 2013 .

[58]  Gerard P. Hodgkinson,et al.  Coming in from the cold: The psychological foundations of radical innovation revisited , 2014 .

[59]  Patrick Spieth,et al.  Reinventing a business model in industrial networks: Implications for customers' brand perceptions , 2019, Industrial Marketing Management.

[60]  Birgitta Sandberg,et al.  What makes it so difficult? A systematic review on barriers to radical innovation , 2014 .

[61]  J. Patton Intuition in decisions , 2003 .

[62]  Frans van den Bosch,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and firm innovativeness: Unpacking the role of the organizational environment , 2016 .

[63]  R. Sternberg,et al.  It Doesn't Hurt to Ask: Effects of Instructions to Be Creative, Practical, or Analytical on Essay-Writing Performance and Their Interaction With Students' Thinking Styles , 2001 .

[64]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[65]  Anita Friis Sommer,et al.  Agile-Stage-Gate: New idea-to-launch method for manufactured new products is faster, more responsive , 2016 .

[66]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[67]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[68]  Lisa K. Gundry,et al.  Intuition versus Analysis? Testing Differential Models of Cognitive Style on Entrepreneurial Self–Efficacy and the New Venture Creation Process , 2009 .

[69]  R. Cooper,et al.  Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors , 1996 .

[70]  Eric Fang Customer Participation and the Trade-Off between New Product Innovativeness and Speed to Market , 2008 .

[71]  E. Nijssen,et al.  Strategic Value Assessment and Explorative Learning Opportunities with Customers , 2012 .

[72]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[73]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[74]  E. B. Andersen,et al.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[75]  Kenneth R. Hammond,et al.  Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice , 2000 .

[76]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[77]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  Modifying Paradigms: Individual Differences, Creativity Techniques and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression , 2012 .

[79]  C. Schultz,et al.  The Mixed Blessings of Technological Innovativeness for the Commercial Success of New Products , 2011 .

[80]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Lost Roots: How Project Management Came to Emphasize Control over Flexibility and Novelty , 2010 .

[81]  Noel O'Sullivan,et al.  Endogeneity: How Failure to Correct for It Can Cause Wrong Inferences and Some Remedies , 2015 .

[82]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: The Idea Itself and the Circumstances of Its Emergence as Predictors of New Product Success , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[83]  J. Karimi,et al.  Corporate Entrepreneurship, Disruptive Business Model Innovation Adoption, and Its Performance: The Case of the Newspaper Industry , 2016 .

[84]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Environmental Turbulence and Discretion , 1993 .

[85]  Fiona Schweitzer,et al.  There's More Than One Perspective to Take Into Account for Successful Customer Integration Into Radical New Product Innovation: A Framework and Research Agenda , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[86]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[87]  David Wilemon,et al.  Focusing the Fuzzy Front-End in New Product Development , 2002 .

[88]  David Chan,et al.  Cognitive Misfit of Problem-Solving Style at Work: A Facet of Person-Organization Fit , 1996 .

[89]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  Market Vision and the Front End of NPD for Radical Innovation: The Impact of Moderating Effects , 2012 .

[90]  David T. Wilson,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Market Structure, Firm Structure, Strategy, and Market Orientation Culture on Dimensions of Small-Firm Performance , 1996 .

[91]  S. R. Rosenthal,et al.  Integrating the Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development , 1997 .

[92]  Joseph M. Bonner,et al.  The influence of formal controls on customer interactivity in new product development , 2005 .

[93]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Team intuition as a continuum construct and new product creativity: The role of environmental turbulence, team experience, and stress , 2011 .

[94]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  Building a Measurement Model for Market Visioning Competence and Its Proposed Antecedents: Organizational Encouragement of Divergent Thinking, Divergent Thinking Attitudes, and Ideational Behavior , 2015 .

[95]  Wafa Hammedi,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of reflexivity in new product idea screening , 2011 .

[96]  Aybars Tuncdogan,et al.  Guest editorial: Psychological micro-foundations of business-to-business decision making , 2019, Industrial Marketing Management.

[97]  Paul R. Kleindorfer,et al.  Reflections on Decision Making Under Uncertainty , 2008 .

[98]  Petronella C. de Weerd-Nederhof,et al.  The Impact of Team Cognitive Styles on Performance of Radical and Incremental NPD Projects , 2014 .

[99]  Jonathan Evans Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[100]  Patrick Spieth,et al.  What Does Front-End Research Build on? A Cocitation Analysis of the Intellectual Background and Potential Future Research Avenues , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[101]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  Network-based market knowledge and product innovativeness , 2012 .

[102]  Fred Langerak,et al.  Rational Versus Intuitive Gatekeeping: Escalation of Commitment in the Front End of NPD , 2018, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[103]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Blue Ocean Strategy: From Theory to Practice , 2005 .

[104]  Ana García-Granero,et al.  Unraveling the link between managerial risk-taking and innovation: The mediating role of a risk-taking climate , 2015 .

[105]  S. Markham,et al.  Product Development as Core Competence: How Formal Product Development Practices Differ for Radical, More Innovative, and Incremental Product Innovations† , 2014 .

[106]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[107]  F. Bosch,et al.  Co-Evolution in Strategic Renewal Behaviour of British, Dutch and French Financial Incumbents: Interaction of Environmental Selection, Institutional Effects and Managerial Intentionality , 2003 .