Local and Global Ductility of Wide-Beam RC Frames

Italian and Spanish seismic codes prescribe lower behaviour factor (q) for wide-beam reinforced concrete moment resisting frames (WBF) with respect to conventional q factors adopted for deep-beam frames (DBF). Conversely, other relevant seismic codes worldwide, such as Eurocode 8, consider WBF capable of high ductility performances, provided that design rules related to (i) stress transfer in connections, (ii) lateral stiffness and (iii) energy dissipation are complied. On the other hand, local ductility of wide beams (WB) appears to be systematically lower than that for deep beams (DB). A parametric comparative numerical analysis of deformations of DB and WB, following the current approach, shows that WB have larger ultimate chord rotation but lower ductility in terms of chord rotation than DB despite the similar ductility in curvature, which is mainly due to a lower plastic hinge lengths in WB. Aimed at verifying whether such disadvantage is overcome by modern codes or not, several archetype European RC residential buildings are designed alternatively with DB or WB. Seismic performances are assessed with different degree of detail. Results suggest that WBF provide at least similar global seismic capacities than DBF, especially in frames whose design is ruled by damage limitation limit state. Hence, any reduction of q in Mediterranean codes for WBF appears to be at least obsolete.

[1]  Amadeo Benavent-Climent,et al.  Exterior wide beam–column connections in existing RC frames subjected to lateral earthquake loads , 2009 .

[2]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  Ductility of wide-beam RC frames as lateral resisting system , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[3]  James K. Wight,et al.  Wide Beam-Column Connections under Earthquake-Type Loading , 1994 .

[4]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  Seismic performances and behaviour factor of wide-beam and deep-beam RC frames , 2016 .

[5]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  The structural role played by masonry infills on RC building performances after the 2011 Lorca, Spain, earthquake , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[6]  J. Wight,et al.  Behavior of reinforced concrete exterior wide beam-column-slab connections subjected to lateral earthquake loading. , 1999 .

[7]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Seismic Design, Assessment and Retrofitting of Concrete Buildings , 2009 .

[8]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Flexure-controlled ultimate deformations of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars , 2010 .

[9]  M. Fardis,et al.  Deformations of Reinforced Concrete Members at Yielding and Ultimate , 2001 .

[10]  A. Benavent‐Climent,et al.  Interior wide beam-column connections in existing RC frames subjected to lateral earthquake loading , 2010 .

[11]  Gert Heshe,et al.  DS/ENV 1992-1-1 NAD. National Application Document for Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 1993 .

[12]  Issa Fadwa,et al.  Reinforced concrete wide and conventional beam–column connections subjected to lateral load , 2014 .

[13]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Seismic Tests on RC Building Exterior Joints with Wide Beams , 2013 .

[14]  Sudhakar A. Kulkarni,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Exterior Wide Beam-Column Joints , 2010 .