Expert systems are a well-known and well-received technology. It was thought that the performance of a domain expert could not be duplicated by a machine. Expert systems technologies have shown this to be a false belief, and indeed have demonstrated how experts themselves can come to depend on expert systems. Expert systems enjoy widespread use in industrial domains and further uses are planned. The growth in acceptance has been explosive since about 1986. Continued rampant growth appears to depend on cracking the so-called knowledge acquisition bottleneck.
The knowledge acquisition bottleneck limits the scalability of expert systems. While it is relatively straightforward to populate a small-scale knowledge base, it becomes more difficult to maintain consistency and validity as the knowledge base grows. Thus, it is important to automate the knowledge acquisition process. A by-product of this process is that any failure of the expert system will be “soft.”
The question is, “What impact can machine learning technologies have on knowledge acquisition in the large?” The true test will be on prospective industrial applications in areas such as biology, education, geology, medicine, and scientific discovery. Machine learning technologies include expert systems, genetic algorithms, neural networks, random seeded crystal learning, or any effective combinations.
Relevant subtopics include:
Second generation expert systems — progress and prognosis
Repertory Grids
The importance of symbolic and qualitative reasoning
The acquisition of fuzzy rules
The best learning paradigm or combination of paradigms
Impact of machine learning on explanation systems
The role of toy domains such as chess
Automatic programming revisited
Applications to computer vision, decision support systems, diagnosis, helpdesks, optimization, planning, scheduling, et al.
Implementation issues using SIMD and MIMD platforms
Sources for joint sponsorship
Forming industrial partnerships
Forming alliances abroad
[1]
Barry G. Silverman,et al.
Survey of expert critiquing systems: practical and theoretical frontiers
,
1992,
CACM.
[2]
Bruce G. Buchanan,et al.
Design of Knowledge-Based Systems with a Knowledge-Based Assistant
,
1988,
IEEE Trans. Software Eng..
[3]
J. W. Atmar,et al.
Speculation on the evolution of intelligence and its possible realization in machine form.
,
1976
.
[4]
Maurice V. Wilkes.
Artificial Intelligence as the year 2000 approaches
,
1992,
CACM.
[5]
James L. McClelland,et al.
Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations
,
1986
.
[6]
Yishai A. Feldman,et al.
Seven Layers of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Support of Software Development
,
1992,
IEEE Trans. Software Eng..
[7]
Richard C. Waters.
The Programmer's Apprentice: A Session with KBEmacs
,
1985,
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
[8]
W. Pitts,et al.
A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943)
,
2021,
Ideas That Created the Future.
[9]
Allen Newell,et al.
Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search
,
1976,
CACM.