Attention shifting during child—robot interaction: a preliminary clinical study for children with autism spectrum disorder

There is an increasing need to introduce socially interactive robots as a means of assistance in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) treatment and rehabilitation, to improve the effectiveness of rehabilitation training and the diversification of treatment, and to alleviate the shortage of medical personnel in mainland China and other places in the world. In this preliminary clinical study, three different socially interactive robots with different appearances and functionalities were tested in therapy-like settings in four different rehabilitation facilities/institutions in Shenzhen, China. Seventy-four participants, including 52 children with ASD, whose processes of interacting with robots were recorded by three different cameras, all received a single-session three-robot intervention. Data were collected from not only the videos recorded, but also the questionnaires filled mostly by parents of the participants. Some insights from the preliminary results were obtained. These can contribute to the research on physical robot design and evaluations on robots in therapy-like settings. First, when doing physical robot design, some preferential focus should be on aspects of appearances and functionalities. Second, attention analysis using algorithms such as estimation of the directions of gaze and head posture of a child in the video clips can be adopted to quantitatively measure the prosocial behaviors and actions (e.g., attention shifting from one particular robot to other robots) of the children. Third, observing and calculating the frequency of the time children spend on exploring/playing with the robots in the video clips can be adopted to qualitatively analyze such behaviors and actions. Limitations of the present study are also presented.

[1]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Are Robots Ready to Deliver Autism Interventions? A Comprehensive Review , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[2]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  A Survey of Expectations About the Role of Robots in Robot-Assisted Therapy for Children with ASD: Ethical Acceptability, Trust, Sociability, Appearance, and Attachment , 2015, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[3]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Prevalence of autism in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, Molecular Autism.

[4]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Encouraging User Autonomy through Robot-Mediated Intervention , 2015, HRI.

[5]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  How to Build a Supervised Autonomous System for Robot-Enhanced Therapy for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2017, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.

[6]  Jin Xu,et al.  Does appearance matter? Validating engagement in therapy protocols with socially interactive humanoid robots , 2017, 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).

[7]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Tactile Interactions with a Humanoid Robot: Novel Play Scenario Implementations with Children with Autism , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[8]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  Atypical Visual Saliency in Autism Spectrum Disorder Quantified through Model-Based Eye Tracking , 2015, Neuron.

[9]  Ayanna M. Howard,et al.  Recognition of Gestural Behaviors Expressed by Humanoid Robotic Platforms for Teaching Affect Recognition to Children with Autism - A Healthy Subjects Pilot Study , 2017, ICSR.

[10]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Probogotchi: A Novel Edutainment Device as a Bridge for Interaction between a Child with Asd and the Typically Developed Sibling , 2016 .

[11]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Socially assistive robotics: Human augmentation versus automation , 2017, Science Robotics.

[12]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  A Pilot Study with a Novel Setup for Collaborative Play of the Humanoid Robot KASPAR with Children with Autism , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[13]  Claire A. G. J. Huijnen,et al.  Mapping Robots to Therapy and Educational Objectives for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2016, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[14]  Peter Robinson,et al.  OpenFace: An open source facial behavior analysis toolkit , 2016, 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[15]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  How to Implement Robots in Interventions for Children with Autism? A Co-creation Study Involving People with Autism, Parents and Professionals , 2017, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[16]  L. Billeci,et al.  Autism and social robotics: A systematic review , 2016, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[17]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Robots for use in autism research. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[18]  Cristina A. Costescu,et al.  The Effects of Robot-Enhanced Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analysis , 2014 .

[19]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Month-long, In-home Case Study of a Socially Assistive Robot for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2018, HRI.

[20]  Lauren M. Schmitt,et al.  The Clinical Use of Robots for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Critical Review. , 2012, Research in autism spectrum disorders.