The predictive value of the ‘Hull & Rutherford’ classification for tubal damage

Objective  This study explores the predictive value for live birth following tubal reconstructive surgery of the ‘Hull and Rutherford’ (H&R) classification system.

[1]  R. Lilford,et al.  Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  V. Akande.  Tubal pelvic damage: Prediction and prognosis , 2002, Human fertility.

[3]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Hull and Rutherford classification of infertility , 2002, Human fertility.

[4]  M. Degueldre,et al.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  J. Collins.  Clinical research evidence and clinical practice. , 1997, Human Reproduction.

[6]  M. Canis,et al.  Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  D. Guzick,et al.  Revised endometriosis classification: 1996. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  K. Cha,et al.  Fertility outcome after laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  E. Surrey,et al.  Correlation between salpingoscopic and laparoscopic staging in the assessment of the distal fallopian tube. , 1996 .

[10]  B. Dunphy,et al.  Falloposcopic cannulation, oviductal appearances and prediction of treatment independent intrauterine pregnancy. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[11]  L. Muzii,et al.  Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  M. Hull,et al.  Tubal surgery versus assisted reproduction: assessing their role in infertility therapy. , 1995, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[13]  I. Cooke,et al.  Comparison of fallopian tube intraluminal pathology as assessed by salpingoscopy with pelvic adhesions. , 1994, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  M. Canis,et al.  6 Classification of endometriosis , 1993 .

[15]  M. Canis,et al.  Classification of endometriosis. , 1993, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  I. Cooke,et al.  An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[17]  R. Winston,et al.  Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  R. Lilford,et al.  Has in‐vitro fertilization made salpingostomy obsolete? , 1990, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  C. Wu,et al.  Assessment of infertility surgery by a pelvic scoring system. , 1989, International journal of fertility.

[20]  Wu Ch,et al.  Assessment of infertility surgery by a pelvic scoring system. , 1989 .

[21]  C. Wu,et al.  A pelvic scoring system for infertility surgery. , 1988, International journal of fertility.

[22]  A. Decherney,et al.  The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. , 1988, Fertility and sterility.

[23]  H. Leese.  The formation and function of oviduct fluid. , 1988, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[24]  S. Brown,et al.  Infertility surgery for pelvic inflammatory disease: Success rates after salpingolysis and salpingostomy , 1988, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[25]  J. Donnez,et al.  Prognostic factors influencing the pregnancy rate after microsurgical cornual anastomosis. , 1986, Fertility and sterility.

[26]  G. Mage,et al.  A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery. , 1986, Fertility and Sterility.

[27]  J. Donnez,et al.  Microchirurgie des lésions tubaires distales. Analyse de 270 interventions. , 1986 .

[28]  J. Donnez,et al.  [Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases]. , 1986, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[29]  J. Habbema,et al.  Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinx: a prospective study. , 1986, Fertility and sterility.

[30]  P. Koninckx,et al.  Evolution of the Revised American Fertility Society Classification of Endometriosis. , 1985, Fertility and sterility.

[31]  V. Buttram.  Evolution of the revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis. , 1985, Fertility and sterility.

[32]  R. Kistner,et al.  Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: 1985. , 1985, Fertility and sterility.

[33]  D. Bromham,et al.  Prognostic value of the postcoital test: prospective study based on time-specific conception rates. , 1982, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[34]  D. Bromham,et al.  The value of a single serum progesterone measurement in the midluteal phase as a criterion of a potentially fertile cycle ("ovulation") derived form treated and untreated conception cycles. , 1982, Fertility and sterility.

[35]  E. Caspi,et al.  Surgical management of periadnexal adhesions. , 1981, International journal of fertility.

[36]  I. Bukovsky,et al.  The importance of periadnexal adhesions in tubal reconstructive surgery for infertility. , 1979, Fertility and sterility.

[37]  Classification of endometriosis. The American Fertility Society. , 1979, Fertility and sterility.

[38]  D. Tredway,et al.  Spontaneous pregnancy during the infertility evaluation. , 1978, Fertility and sterility.