Conceptualizing ‘Communication’ in Second Language Acquisition

Overviewing how the field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) conceptualizes ‘communication’ is a complex task. First, researchers differ in their interpretations of the nature of the object of inquiry and the goals of their research, based on different philosophical assumptions about the nature of language and the processes involved in language learning. Second, the concept ‘communication’ is generally taken as widely understood and is seldom defined. This paper uses the definitions of SLA in three paradigms within the field to explore how each paradigm conceptualizes ‘communication’ and its role in the development of the linguistic system of the second language.

[1]  Stephen Pit Corder,et al.  Introducing Applied Linguistics , 1975 .

[2]  M. Swain.  The output hypothesis : Just speaking and writing aren't enough , 1993 .

[3]  Michael H. Long.  Construct Validity in SLA Research: A Response to Firth and Wagner , 1997 .

[4]  S. Engel,et al.  Thought and Language , 1964, Dialogue.

[5]  Meg Gebhard.  Debates in SLA studies: Redefining classroom SLA as an institutional phenomenon , 1999 .

[6]  Claire J. Kramsch.  Second language acquisition, applied linguistics and the teaching of foreign languages , 2003 .

[7]  J. Hall.  Noticing Request-Realization Forms in Implicit Pragmatic Input: Impacts of Motivation and Language Proficiency , 1993 .

[8]  M. Patkowski.  The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. , 1980 .

[9]  S. Gass,et al.  Input, Interaction and Output: An Overview , 2006 .

[10]  Carol Montgomery,et al.  Real Reality Revisited: An Experimental Communicative Course in ESL , 1985 .

[11]  E. Schegloff.  Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation , 1993 .

[12]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[13]  S. P. Corder.  THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORS , 1967 .

[14]  B. Vanpatten.  What Is Second Language Acquisition and What Is It Doing in this Department , 1999 .

[15]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  “A” Stands for Acquisition: A Response to Firth and Wagner , 1997 .

[16]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  Beyond Repair: Conversation Analysis as an Approach to SLA. , 2006 .

[17]  Teresa Pica,et al.  Second Language Learning Through Interaction: Multiple Perspectives , 1996 .

[18]  Claire Kramsch,et al.  The Privilege of the Nonnative Speaker. , 2003 .

[19]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Apples and Oranges: Or, Why Apples Are Not Orange and Don't Need to Be A Response to Firth and Wagner , 1998 .

[20]  Nanda Poulisse.  Some words in defense of the psycholinguistic approach: A response to Firth and Wagner , 1997 .

[21]  R. Hamilton.  The Insignificance of Learners' Errors: A Philosophical Investigation of the Interlanguage Hypothesis. , 2001 .

[22]  J. Lantolf.  Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning: Introduction to the Special Issue , 1994 .

[23]  Johannes Wagner,et al.  SLA PROPERTY: NO TRESPASSING , 1998 .

[24]  J. Hall.  A Consideration of SLA as a Theory of Practice: A Response to Firth and Wagner , 1997 .

[25]  Barbara Seidlhofer,et al.  Controversies in applied linguistics , 2003 .

[26]  S. Gass.  Input and Interaction , 2008 .

[27]  A. Firth,et al.  On Discourse, Communication, and (Some) Fundamental Concepts in SLA Research , 1997 .

[28]  V. Cook,et al.  Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages , Inc . ( TESOL ) Going beyond the Native Speaker in Language Teaching , 2007 .

[29]  R. Ellis.  Second language acquisition , 1997 .

[30]  D. Nunan.  Communicative Language Teaching: Making It Work. , 1987 .

[31]  Interaction, social structure, and second language use: A response to Firth and Wagner , 1997 .

[32]  P. Seedhouse.  Classroom interaction: possibilities and impossibilities , 1996 .

[33]  P. Drew,et al.  Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. , 1994 .

[34]  Patricia A. Duff,et al.  How Much Foreign Language Is There in the Foreign Language Classroom , 1990 .

[35]  Michael H. Long.  The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[36]  A. Devos.  Academic Standards, Internationalisation, and the Discursive Construction of "The International Student" , 2003 .

[37]  M. Swain,et al.  THEORETICAL BASES OF COMMUNICATIVE APPROACHES TO SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND TESTING , 1980 .

[38]  Wander Lowie,et al.  Second Language Acquisition: An Advanced Resource Book , 2006 .

[39]  M. Hecht,et al.  The nonverbal communication reader , 1990 .

[40]  Evangeline Marlos Varonis,et al.  Miscommunication in native/nonnative conversation , 1985, Language in Society.

[41]  Theodore V. Higgs,et al.  The native speaker is dead , 1986 .

[42]  Stephen Krashen,et al.  The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications , 1986 .

[43]  M. Clyne.  The use of exclusionary language to manipulate opinion: John Howard, asylum seekers and the reemergence of political incorrectness in Australia , 2005 .