Can nonhuman primates use tokens to represent and sum quantities?

It is unclear whether nonhuman animals can use physical tokens to flexibly represent various quantities by combining token values. Previous studies showed that chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and a macaque (Macaca mulatta) were only partly successful in tests involving sets of different-looking food containers representing different food quantities, while some capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) have shown greater success in tests involving sets of various concrete objects representing different food quantities. Some of the discrepancy in results between these studies may be attributed to the different methods used. In an effort to reconcile these discrepancies, we presented two primates species, chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys, with two token tasks. The critical test in each task involved summing the value of multiple tokens of different types to make accurate quantity judgments. We found that, using either method, individuals of both species learned to associate individual tokens with specific quantities, as well as successfully compare individual tokens to one another or to sets of visible food items. However, regardless of method, only a few individuals exhibited the capacity to sum multiple tokens of different types and then use those summed values to make an optimal response. This suggests that flexible combination of symbolic stimuli in quantity judgments tasks is within the abilities of chimpanzees and capuchins but does not characterize the majority of individuals. Furthermore, the results suggest the need to carefully examine specific methodological details that may promote or hinder such possible representation.

[1]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols? , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  M. O'Regan,et al.  Discriminative responding of a dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) to differentially rewarded stimuli. , 1985 .

[3]  T. Deacon The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain , 1998 .

[4]  Robert Gisiner,et al.  Artificial Language Comprehension in Dolphins and Sea Lions: The Essential Cognitive Skills , 1988 .

[5]  Josep Call,et al.  Spatial rotations and transpositions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 2003, Primates.

[6]  Ronald J. Schusterman,et al.  California Sea Lions Are Capable of Semantic Comprehension , 1984 .

[7]  Duane M. Rumbaugh,et al.  Language Learning by a Chimpanzee: The Lana Project , 1977 .

[8]  M. Beran Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) succeed in a test of quantity conservation , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[9]  J. Call,et al.  Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus): the effect of presenting whole sets versus item-by-item. , 2007, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  M. Beran,et al.  Chimpanzees Remember the Results of One-by-One Addition of Food Items to Sets Over Extended Time Periods , 2004, Psychological science.

[11]  Mary Catherine Mareno,et al.  Endowment Effects in Chimpanzees , 2007, Current Biology.

[12]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[13]  I. Pepperberg Numerical competence in an African gray parrot (Psittacus erithacus). , 1994 .

[14]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous representations of small numbers of objects by rhesus macaques: Examinations of content and format , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Michael J Beran,et al.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[16]  I. Pepperberg The Alex Studies: Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of Grey Parrots , 2000 .

[17]  Laurie R Santos,et al.  The Evolution of Our Preferences: Evidence from Capuchin Monkey Trading Behavior , 2005 .

[18]  F. D. de Waal,et al.  Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  David Premack,et al.  The Mind of an Ape , 1983 .

[20]  Duane M. Rumbaugh,et al.  "Constructive" enumeration by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) on a computerized task , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[21]  L. Herman,et al.  Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins , 1984, Cognition.

[22]  M. Beran,et al.  Summation and quantity judgments of sequentially presented sets by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) , 2008, American journal of primatology.

[23]  Sarah T. Boysen,et al.  Primate numerical competence: contributions toward understanding nonhuman cognition , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  R. Gardner,et al.  Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. , 1969, Science.

[25]  I. Pepperberg,et al.  Ordinality and inferential abilities of a grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[26]  F. D. de Waal,et al.  A Concept of Value during Experimental Exchange in Brown Capuchin Monkeys, Cebus apella , 2004, Folia Primatologica.

[27]  David A. Washburn,et al.  Intelligence of Apes and Other Rational Beings , 2003 .

[28]  E. Sue Savage-Rumbaugh,et al.  The development of language skills in PAN — II. Production , 1996 .

[29]  W. Roberts,et al.  Summation of symbols by pigeons (Columba livia): the importance of number and mass of reward items. , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[30]  George A. Miller,et al.  Language and Communication , 1951 .

[31]  S. Brosnan,et al.  Monkeys reject unequal pay , 2003, Nature.

[32]  S. Carey,et al.  The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes , 2002, Psychological science.

[33]  G. Berntson,et al.  Size matters: impact of item size and quantity on array choice by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[34]  E. S. Savage-rumbaugh,et al.  Ape Language: From Conditioned Response to Symbol , 1986 .

[35]  Eran Shifferman,et al.  Its own reward: lessons to be drawn from the reversed-reward contingency paradigm , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[36]  G. Berntson,et al.  Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[37]  T. Matsuzawa,et al.  Sequential responding to arabic numerals with wild cards by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[38]  C. Padoa-Schioppa,et al.  Preference Transitivity and Symbolic Representation in Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella) , 2008, PloS one.

[39]  I. Pepperberg Evidence for Conceptual Quantitative Abilities in the African Grey Parrot: Labeling of Cardinal Sets , 2010 .

[40]  Timothy M. Flemming,et al.  Ordinal judgments of symbolic stimuli by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): the effects of differential and nondifferential reward. , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.

[41]  M. Beran,et al.  Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the role of magnitude, contiguity, and wholeness. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[42]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous number representation in semi–free–ranging rhesus monkeys , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  J. Call,et al.  Tracking and inferring spatial rotation by children and great apes. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[44]  S. Suomi,et al.  Token-mediated tool-use by a tufted capuchin monkey (Cebus apella) , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[45]  M. Beran,et al.  Trading behavior between conspecifics in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. , 2009, Journal of comparative psychology.

[46]  G. Westergaard,et al.  Token mediated tool exchange between tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[47]  Peter G Judge,et al.  Ordinal representation of numeric quantities by brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[48]  David A. Washburn,et al.  Ordinal Judgments of Numerical Symbols by Macaques (Macaca Mulatta) , 1991, Psychological science.

[49]  William A. Roberts,et al.  Judgments of ordinality and summation of number symbols by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). , 1997 .

[50]  H S Terrace,et al.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[51]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Use of numbers by a chimpanzee , 1985, Nature.

[52]  M. Beran,et al.  Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[53]  M. Beran,et al.  Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees based on the number, size, contour length and visibility of items , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  Ordinal judgments and summation of nonvisible sets of food items by two chimpanzees and a rhesus macaque. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[55]  Responses to quantity: Perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1995 .

[56]  E. S. Savage-rumbaugh,et al.  The development of language skills in bonobo and chimpanzee—I. Comprehension , 1995 .

[57]  M. Beran Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[58]  Laurie R Santos,et al.  Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.