A multi-criteria ratio-based approach for two-stage data envelopment analysis

Abstract Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a well-known technique for assessing efficiency levels of decision-making units (DMUs). Very often, available data may be expressed as ratios and, in such cases, traditional DEA models cannot be applied as long as biased efficiency results are produced, yielding the issues of efficiency underestimation and pseudo-inefficiency. In this paper, a novel two-stage MCDEA-R model to handle ratio data is developed observing three distinct assumptions – black-box, free-link, and fixed-link – offering a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) perspective to the efficiency assessment problem in productive networks. While the proposed models are tested by evaluating the efficiency levels of a set of 30 bank branches in Iran, their distinctive features are highlighted in terms of previous literature to model ratio data under network structures. Precisely, there were not only gains in terms of mitigating pseudo-inefficiency and lack of discrimination power of weights issues, but there were also actual gains in terms of efficiency reliability as measured by information entropy.

[1]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Alternative SBM Model for Network DEA , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[2]  Hamid Noori,et al.  A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Yongjun Li,et al.  DEA Models for Extended Two-Stage Network Structures , 2012 .

[4]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A combined use of DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) with Strong Complementary Slackness Condition and DEA-DA (Discriminant Analysis) , 2011, Appl. Math. Lett..

[5]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs , 2013 .

[6]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Efficiency analysis with ratio measures , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[8]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  Data envelopment analysis models with ratio data: A revisit , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[10]  Hasan Bal,et al.  Improving the discrimination power and weights dispersion in the data envelopment analysis , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[12]  Chiang Kao Decomposition of slacks-based efficiency measures in network data envelopment analysis , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  F. Førsund Weight restrictions in DEA: misplaced emphasis? , 2013 .

[14]  Lidia Angulo Meza,et al.  A goal programming approach to solve the multiple criteria DEA model , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis with slacks-based measures , 2014 .

[16]  Gary R. Reeves,et al.  A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  A joint-inputs Network DEA approach to production and pollution-generating technologies , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Measuring efficiency in a general production possibility set allowing for negative data , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  William L. Weber,et al.  A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs , 2010 .

[23]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[24]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[25]  Fang Xu,et al.  A study of DEA models without explicit inputs , 2011 .

[26]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .

[27]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A multiple criteria approach to two-stage data envelopment analysis , 2016 .

[28]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[29]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  A bi-objective weighted model for improving the discrimination power in MCDEA , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Chih-Hung Tsai,et al.  Exploration of efficiency underestimation of CCR model: Based on medical sectors with DEA-R model , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Jie Wu,et al.  Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA , 2014 .

[34]  Chih-Hung Tsai,et al.  A study of developing an input-oriented ratio-based comparative efficiency model , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Chih-Hung Tsai,et al.  Using the DEA-R model in the hospital industry to study the pseudo-inefficiency problem , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[37]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  DEA models for ratio data:convexity consideration , 2009 .

[38]  J. Paradi,et al.  DEA-R: ratio-based comparative efficiency model, its mathematical relation to DEA and its use in applications , 2007 .

[39]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Efficiency measures and computational approaches for data envelopment analysis models with ratio inputs and outputs , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  S. Lozano,et al.  Network DEA smallest improvement approach , 2019 .