Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

PURPOSE To determine the number of researchers who fulfill the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship criteria and to evaluate individual contributions. MATERIALS AND METHODS The author contribution lists of Radiology articles published between 1998 and 2000 with at least three authors were reviewed. The fulfillment of ICMJE criteria for authorship and the contribution percentage were assessed according to each researcher's position in the byline and nationality (American vs international), number of researchers per article, and year of publication. RESULTS Sixty-eight percent of researchers fulfilled the ICMJE authorship criteria. Position in the byline indicated a significant difference in fulfillment (P <.001): 98.9% and 85.3% for the first and second authors, respectively, and 52.8% and 66.5% for the middle and last authors, respectively. American researchers had a higher percentage (78%) of fulfillment than did international researchers (57%) (P <.001). Fulfillment decreased as the number of authors per article increased (P <.001), although there was no significant change throughout 1998-2000. The mean contribution percentages decreased greatly from first to second to last to middle authors. American researchers had a significantly larger mean contribution percentage than did international researchers. Of the total 6,686 researchers, 2,316 (35%) contributed to one or two categories. This rate was higher for middle and international authors. CONCLUSION The 68% fulfillment of criteria for authorship was closely related to the large number of researchers contributing to one category or to categories belonging to the same ICMJE criterion.

[1]  D. Rennie,et al.  Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. , 1998, JAMA.

[2]  D. Rennie,et al.  Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. , 1994, JAMA.

[3]  M. Shapiro,et al.  The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. , 1994, JAMA.

[4]  A V Proto,et al.  The effect of changes in guidelines for authorship on current radiology publications. , 2000, Radiology.

[5]  R. Slone Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  G D Lundberg,et al.  The order of authorship: who's on first? , 1990, JAMA.

[7]  N W Goodman,et al.  Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical research , 1994, BMJ.

[8]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[9]  S D Moulopoulos,et al.  For debate . . . Individual contributions to multiauthor papers. , 1983, British medical journal.

[10]  C. Athanasoulis Authors need to be educated on authorship principles. , 2000, Radiology.

[11]  F. Davidoff News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  F Godlee,et al.  Definition of “authorship” may be changed , 1996, BMJ.

[13]  A. Overbeke,et al.  What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names? A study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine). , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  A. Proto Radiology—1998 and the Future , 1998 .

[15]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: reflections on the troubled question of authorship , 2000, Journal of medical ethics.

[16]  D. Rennie,et al.  When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. , 1997, JAMA.