Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups

We conceptualize participation in Linux user groups (LUGs) in terms of group-referent intentional actions and investigate cognitive (attitudes, perceived behavioral control, identification with the open source movement), affective (positive and negative anticipated emotions), and social (social identity) determinants of participation and its consequences on Linux-related behaviors of users. This survey-based study, conducted with 402 active LUG members representing 191 different LUGs from 23 countries and employing structural equation modeling methodology, supports the proposed model. Furthermore, we find that the Linux user's experience level moderates the extent of the LUG's social influence and its impact on the user's participation. We conclude with a consideration of the managerial and research implications of the study's findings.

[1]  Amitai Etzioni.  The Responsive Community: A Communitarian Perspective , 1995 .

[2]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[3]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem , 1994 .

[4]  Robert Cudeck,et al.  Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. , 1989 .

[5]  R. Pieters,et al.  Goal-directed Emotions , 1998 .

[6]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[7]  Kieran Healy,et al.  The Ecology of Open-Source Software Development , 2003 .

[8]  Glyn Moody,et al.  Rebel Code: Linux and the Open Source Revolution , 2001 .

[9]  Linus Torvalds,et al.  Just for Fun: The Story of an Accidental Revolutionary , 2001 .

[10]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[11]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Multiple routes for social influence: The role of compliance, internalization and social identity. , 2002 .

[12]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  The Future of Competition , 2004 .

[13]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Performance and Satisfaction in an Industrial Sales Force: An Examination of their Antecedents and Simultaneity , 1980 .

[14]  Raimo Tuomela,et al.  The We‐Mode and the I‐Mode , 2007 .

[15]  Sonali K. Shah.  UNDERSTANDING THE NATURE OF PARTICIPATION & COORDINATION IN OPEN AND GATED SOURCE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITIES. , 2004 .

[16]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[17]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Mobilization of software developers: the free software movement , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[18]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[19]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies , 2003 .

[20]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[21]  Steven Weber,et al.  The Success of Open Source , 2004 .

[22]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Decision making and effort in the self-regulation of hypertension: testing two competing theories. , 2005, British journal of health psychology.

[23]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research , 1998 .

[24]  R. Bagozzi.  On the Concept of Intentional Social Action in Consumer Behavior , 2000 .

[25]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Intentional social action in virtual communities , 2002 .

[26]  M. Maffesoli.  The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society , 1995 .

[27]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Joseph R. Gusfield,et al.  Community: A Critical Response. , 1976 .

[29]  Peter Adams,et al.  The EMMIX software for the fitting of mixtures of normal and t-components , 1999 .

[30]  E. Raymond.  A Brief History of Hackerdom , 2004 .

[31]  J. Crocker,et al.  Collective Self-Esteem and Psychological Well-Being among White, Black, and Asian College Students , 1994 .

[32]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Network Community: An Introduction to Networks in the 19 Global Village , 1999 .

[33]  R. Tuomela.  We-Intentions Revisited , 2005 .

[34]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Online Social Interactions , 2007 .

[35]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[36]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The New Hacker's Dictionary , 1991 .

[37]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[38]  Raimo Tuomela,et al.  Cooperation - A Philosophical Study , 2000 .

[39]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Self‐categorisation, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity , 1999 .

[40]  H. Marsh,et al.  An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. , 1996 .

[41]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[42]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  How effortful decisions get enacted: the motivating role of decision processes, desires, and anticipated emotions , 2003 .

[43]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities , 2004 .

[44]  M. Perugini,et al.  The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[45]  G. McLachlan.  On Bootstrapping the Likelihood Ratio Test Statistic for the Number of Components in a Normal Mixture , 1987 .

[46]  Drew Harrington.  The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age , 2002 .

[47]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Projects , 2002, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[49]  C. Bell,et al.  The sociology of community , 1974 .

[50]  Sandeep Krishnamurthy,et al.  The Launching of Mozilla Firefox- A Case Study in Community-Led Marketing i , 2005 .

[51]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[52]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value With Customers , 2004 .

[53]  Chris DiBona,et al.  Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution , 1999 .

[54]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[55]  Marco Perugini,et al.  Predicting and understanding behavioral volitions: the interplay between goals and behaviors , 2000 .

[56]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams , 2006, MIS Q..

[57]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[58]  Jan Ljungberg,et al.  Open source movements as a model for organising , 2000, ECIS.

[59]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[60]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction , 2002 .

[61]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities , 2006 .

[62]  Margaret Gilbert.  On Social Facts , 1989 .

[63]  R. Stallman.  Why software should be free , 1990 .